Case law

Brown v. Kristianson

97 F.3d 1458 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 12, 1996

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry M. … We conclude the district court's dismissal was proper because Brown's claims are barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity. See Mullis v.

In Re Anchorage International Inn, Inc.

718 F.2d 1446 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 1983

See C.Y., Inc. v. Brown, 574 P.2d 1274, 1277 (Alaska 1978). Nevertheless, the creditor's interest in the license is an encumbrance superior to the rights of others. … See State Board of Equalization v. Stodd, 500 F.2d 1208, 1210 (9th Cir.1974).

Associated Ready Mixed Concrete, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

108 F.3d 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 17, 1997

See NLRB v. Fishermen & Allied Workers Union, Local 33, 448 F.2d 255, 256 (9th Cir.1971). … The National Labor Relations Board’s order is ENFORCED.

Carpenters Union Local No. 1109 v. National Labor Relations Board

219 F. App'x 654 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 2007

ORDER The National Labor Relation Board’s Motion for Clarification and for Extension of Time to File Proposed Judgment is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition in this case, Carpenters Union Local No. 1109 v. … The Board shall have fourteen days from the date this Order is entered within which to submit its proposed judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 19.

United States Nat. Bank of Centralia v. City of Centralia

240 F. 93 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 13, 1917

Bank v. School District No. 8, 94 Fed. 705 , 36 C. C. A. 432 ; Board of Com’rs v. Strawn, 157 Fed. 49 , 84 C. C. A. 553 , 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1100. … Titlow v. McCormick, 236 Fed. 209 , - C. C. A.-; Schuyler v. Littlefield, 232 U. S. 707 , 34 Sup. Ct. 466, 58 L. Fd. 806; Brennan v. Tillinghast, 201 Fed. 609 , 120 C. C. A. 37 ; Board of Com’rs v.

Romero v. Squier

133 F.2d 528 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 1943

accompanies the *531 search to pick his watch out from another or others in John Brown’s room. … We do not agree that Johnson v.

Salviejo-Fernandez v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 31, 2006

In Brown v. … After the immigration judge’s removal order was reversed by the Board 8516 SALVIEJO-FERNANDEZ v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 396, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

509 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 1975

The order to arbitrate was well within the Board’s remedial discretion. (See Local Union No. 12, United Rubber, C., L. & P. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B. (5th Cir. 1966), 368 F.2d 12, 24-25 ; cf. Humphrey v. … “Congress has vested the Board, not the courts, with broad discretion to order a violator ‘to take such affirmative action as will effectuate the policies of [the Act]”’ (N.L.R.B. v.

Misty Brown v. Megan Brennan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 17, 2024

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we review de novo, Curry v. … Coons v. Sec’y of U.S. Dep’t of Treasury, 383 F.3d 879, 887 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1187 (9th Cir. 2003)).

Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy Seguirant

74 F. 4th 1042 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 25, 2023

Brown’s facts are distinguishable from those presented here. In Brown, the plaintiff raised only § 1981 claims (in addition to tort and state law claims), see Brown v. … Brown, 744 F.3d at 1022 (citing Johnson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 104, Afl-Cio

64 F.3d 465 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 8, 1995

See National Labor Relations Board v. IBEW, 481 U.S. 573, 581-82 , 107 S.Ct. 2002, 2008 , 95 L.Ed.2d 557 (1987) [hereinafter “Local 340"] I. … In so doing, the Court cited Florida Power & Light v.

McCarthy v. Brown

83 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 1996

Michael BROWN; George Miller; Katrina Richter; The Board of Adjustment for the City of Tucson; Thomas Parsons; Superior Court of Pima County; State of Arizona; State Bar of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15607. … See Balistreri v.

Jarrett v. Resor

426 F.2d 213 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 23, 1970

Benson v. State Board of Parole & Probation, 384 F.2d 238, 239 (9th Cir. 1967); Wells v. United States, 280 F.2d 275, 277 (9th Cir. 1960). On this appeal Lt. … Schonbrun v. Commanding Officer, 403 F.2d 371, 373 (2d Cir. 1968) ; In re Kelly, 401 F.2d 211, 213 (5th Cir. 1968); Brown v. McNamara, 387 F.2d 150, 152 (3rd Cir. 1967).

Sacramento City Unified School District, Board of Education v. Rachel H. ex rel. Holland

14 F.3d 1398 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 24, 1994

Dist., 980 F.2d 585 , 588 (9th Cir.1992); W.G. v. Board, 960 F.2d at 1483 . … The district court's opinion is reported in Board of Educ. v. Holland, 786 F.Supp. 874 (E.D.Cal.1992). .

Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob Diridon

995 F.2d 898 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 9, 1993

Group v. San Bernardino County, 825 F.2d 1404, 1408 (9th Cir.1987). “[T]he Fourteenth Amendment was not intended to shift the whole of the public law of the states into the federal courts.” Id. (quoting Brown v. … To reach that conclusion, those cases simply applied language from Board of Regents v.

Los Angeles Unified School District v. United States District Court for the Central District of California

650 F.2d 1004 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 23, 1981

Crawford v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.3d 280 , 287 n.1, 130 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 551 P.2d 28 (1976). It was not until 1963 that the California Supreme Court followed the mandate of Brown v. … Id. at 1201; Miss Universe, Inc. v. Flesher, supra, at 1134. See Brown v. Chote, 411 U.S. 452, 456 , 93 S.Ct. 1732, 1735 , 36 L.Ed.2d 420 (1973).

United States v. Ardell Lee

400 F.2d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 20, 1969

United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 , was decided by the court in 1954. … For example, O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504, 506-507 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 .

Menefield v. Brown

83 F.3d 428 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 26, 1996

James Wilburn MENEFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, Jerry Emanuel Pollard, Plaintiff, 1 v. F.A. BROWN, Lieutenant correctional officer; A. Hesse, Sergeant correctional officer; W. Marose, correctional officer; S. … Hammer v. Gross, 932 F.2d 842, 847 (9th Cir.)

Brazil v. United States Department of the Navy

66 F.3d 193 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 1995

In Brown v. General Servs. … While the Supreme Court has created narrow exceptions to Brown for certain federal employees who would otherwise be without a remedy, see Davis v.

Board of Trustees of the Iunhcamp Health & Welfare Fund v. Progressive Health Alliance

135 F. App'x 63 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 2005

Corder v. Howard Johnson & Co., 53 F.3d 225, 229 (9th Cir.1994). … The appellants assert that the district court has authority to award attorney’s fees under § 1132(g)(1) in reliance on an exception established in Credit Managers Ass’n v. Kennesaw Life & Accident Ins.