Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Trans Ocean Export Packing, Inc., and Dewayne F. Titus

473 F.2d 612 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 1973

Respondents refer to N.L.R.B. v. … Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364 , 86 S.Ct. 1531 , 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966); N. L. R. B. v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 108 F.2d 188, 189 (9th Cir. 1939).

V. O. Motors, Inc., a Corporation v. California State Board of Equalization, Etc.

691 F.2d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 28, 1982

ELY, Circuit Judge: V. 0. Motors, Inc. (“VO”) appeals from the dismissal of its suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against the California State Board of Equalization (“the Board”). … See United States of America v. California State Board of Equalization, 650 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir.), aff’d, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1744 , 72 L.Ed.2d 157 (1972); United States of America v.

C. Salazar v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

616 F. App'x 354 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 29, 2015

BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants - Appellees. … See Chappel v. Lab.

United States v. Donald Charles Jenson

450 F.2d 1258 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 2, 1971

BROWNING, Circuit Judge: Appellant appeals his conviction for refusing to submit to induction in viola *1260 tion of 50 App.U.S.C. § 462 (1968). We affirm. … See Etcheverry v. United States, 320 F.2d 873, 874 (9th Cir. 1963). VI The record refutes appellant’s contention that the board failed to state the reasons for its rulings, as required by United States v.

United Farm Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board

727 F.2d 1475 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 14, 1984

The seminal cases on unconstitutional bias, Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 , 47 S.Ct. 437 , 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927), and Dugan v. … Board was inherently biased.

Olimpia Lazo-Majano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

813 F.2d 1432 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 1987

Neither Immigration Judge Nail nor the Board doubted Olimpia’s story. It must be assumed that they found her testimony credible. See Damaize-Job v. INS, 787 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1986); Canjura-Flores v. … This court, overruling the Board, recognized that such fear of persecution was fear of punishment on account of a political opinion. Kovac v. INS, 407 F.2d 102, 104 (9th Cir.1969) (Browning, J).

Richard L. Barron Linda M. Barron v. Robert Reich Department of Labor Robert Kelley

13 F.3d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 13, 1994

Kyne, 358 U.S. 184, 186-89 , 79 S.Ct. 180, 182-84 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958) (court has jurisdiction to set aside a determination made by the National Labor Relations Board where the Board indisputably violated 29 U.S.C. § 159 … In these situations, mandamus will lie when the standards have been ignored or violated.’ ” Brown, 656 F.2d at 566 (quoting Davis Assocs., Inc. v.

Harris v. Schlesinger

526 F.2d 467 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 1975

OPINION Before BROWNING and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL, * District Judge. … See Sanger v. Seamans, 507 F.2d 814, 816 (9th Cir. 1974); Ward v. Volpe, 484 F.2d 1230, 1235 (9th Cir. 1973).

16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1053, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8138 Dr. Manuel Guerra, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Ad Hoc Committee of Concerned Mexican American Faculty and Students, an Unincorporated Association, and v. Board of Trustees of the California State Universities and Colleges, Robert Hornby, William O. Wessick, Charles Luckman, Daniel H. Ridder, Karl L. Wente, Wendell Witter, Winifred H. Lancaster, Gene M. Benedetti, Robert F. Beaver, Roy T. Brotchy, Mrs. C. Stuart Ritchie, Frank T. Adams, Richard A. Garcia, Dean S. Lesher, Dr. Claudia H. Hampton, Yvonne W. Larson, Individually and as Members of the Board of Trustees of the California State Universities and Colleges, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor of the State of California, Ronald Reagan, Former Governor of the State of California, Mervyn Dymally, Lieutenant Governor of the State of California, Edward Reineke, Former Lieutenant Governor of the State of California, Leo McCarthy Speaker of the Assembly of the State of California, Wilson C. Riles, Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California, Glenn S. Dumke, Chancellor, Individually and as Ex-Officio Members of the Board of Trustees of the California State Universities and Colleges, California Polytechnic State University, Robert E. Kennedy, Individually and as President of California Polytechnic State University, Jon Erickson, Individually and as Dean of the School of Communicative Arts and Humanities of California Polytechnic State University, and Verlan Stahl, Individually and as Acting Head of the Foreign Languages Department of California Polytechnic State University, And

567 F.2d 352 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 23, 1977

Before BROWNING, KILKENNY and TRASK, Circuit Judges. … Kerr v. United States, 426 U.S. 394 , 96 S.Ct. 2119 , 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 95-96 , 88 S.Ct. 269 , 19 L.Ed.2d 305 (1967); Roche v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local 13

581 F.2d 1321 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 19, 1978

The Supreme Court in NLRB v. Boeing Co., 412 U.S. 67, 73-74 , 93 S.Ct. 1952, 1956 , 36 L.Ed.2d 752 (1973) observed: “In Scofield [Scofield v. … Scofield, at 394 U.S. 428 , 89 S.Ct. 1157 , quoted NLRB v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg.

National Labor Relations Board v. Western Building Maintenance Company

402 F.2d 775 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 24, 1968

402 F.2d 775 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … NLRB v. Campbell Soup Company, 378 F.2d 259 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 900 , 88 S.Ct. 220 , 19 L.Ed.2d 217 (1967). 3 The Board order is entitled to enforcement. 1 Honorable E.

National Labor Relations Board v. Arthur H. Kenny, Dba S & K Chevrolet

488 F.2d 774 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 24, 1974

Moreover, the Board’s resolution of the challenge, based on that report, was well within its discretion under the applicable case law. Illinois State Journal Register, Inc. v. … B. v. Harrah’s Club, 403 F. 2d 865 (9th Cir. 1968), and N. L. R. B. v. W. R. Ames Co., 450 F.2d 1209 (9th Cir. 1971).

Doe v. Madison School District No. 321

165 F.3d 1261 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 19, 1999

The three-judge panel opinion, Doe v. Madison School District, No. 97-35642, slip op. at 5361 (9th Cir. May 27, 1998) and the three-judge panel published order, Doe v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Str, Inc., D/B/A Sound Technology Research

549 F.2d 641 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 20, 1977

, as when a snow storm closes the Board’s offices (N.L.R.B. v. … In such cases an order of reinstatement and backpay lies within the powers of the Board. (Phelps Dodge Corp v. N.L.R.B, 313 U.S. 177, 188 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 (1941); Bon Hennings Logging Co. v.

Richard Lawrence Stevenson v. Grentec, Inc., Richard Lawrence Stevenson v. Mojo Boards South Bay Recreational Products, Inc., Richard Lawrence Stevenson v. Wayne Brown D/B/A Wayne Brown Surfboards

652 F.2d 20 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 27, 1981

MOJO BOARDS; South Bay Recreational Products, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Richard Lawrence STEVENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wayne BROWN d/b/a Wayne Brown Surfboards, Defendant-Appellee. … The particular inclination was not critical, however; any acute angle was adequate. 3 In 1975, Stevenson brought this patent infringement suit against Grentec, Mojo Boards and Brown.

Frances Rios v. The Board of Regents of the University of Arizona

811 F.2d 1248 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 2, 1987

Anderson v. City of Bessemer, 470 U.S. 564, 573-76 , 105 S.Ct. 1504, 1511-13 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985); Kimbrough v. Secretary of the United States Air Force, 764 F.2d 1279, 1281 (9th Cir.1985). … United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 715 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1482 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983).

Franklin L. Miller v. Los Angeles County Board of Education and Stuart E. Gothhold

799 F.2d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 1986

Compare Jacobsen v. … See Unt v. Aerospace Corp., 765 F.2d 1440, 1449 (9th Cir.1985).

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 387 v. National Labor Relations Board

788 F.2d 1412 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 6, 1986

Mastro Plastics Corp. v. NLRB, 350 U.S. 270, 279 , 76 S.Ct. 349, 356 , 100 L.Ed. 309 (1956). … See Southern California Edison Co., 646 F.2d at 1365-66; United States Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 711 F.2d 772, 778-79 (7th Cir.1983); W-I Canteen Service, Inc. v. NLRB, 606 F.2d 738, 743, 746-47 (7th Cir.1979); News Union v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Advance Carbon Products, Inc.

489 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 1974

P 14,286 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ADVANCE CARBON PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent. No. 72-3116. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 28, 1974. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. … ORDER 3 The application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its Order is granted. The Board's Order appears in 198 N.L.R.B. 105 . 4 The Board will prepare the necessary Order. 1 Honorable Gus J.

Retail Fruit & Vegetable Clerks Union, Local 1017 v. National Labor Relations Board

249 F.2d 591 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 8, 1957

National Labor Relations Board v. … The Supreme Court said in National Labor Relations Board v.