Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. United Cable Television Corp

730 F.2d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 24, 1984

(BNA) 2920 National Labor Relations Board v. United Cable Television Corp. NO. 83-7130 United States Court of Appeals, ninth Circuit. JAN 24, 1984 1 Appeal From: N.L.R.B. 2 AFFIRMED.

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 183 v. National Labor Relations Board

238 F.2d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 1956

As stated in Addison v. … Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U.S. 177, 194 , 61 S.Ct. 845, 852 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 .”

Helen M. Brown, Ssn Ywq-Gs-Yyuu v. Margaret O. Heckler, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant

713 F.2d 441 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 11, 1983

Ferguson v. Schweiker, 641 F.2d 243, 249 (5th Cir.1981). The psychological evaluations of Brown lead us to question her denials. … Thompson v. Schweiker, 665 F.2d 936, 941 (9th Cir.1982). This duty exists even when the claimant is represented by counsel. See Driggins v. Harris, 657 F.2d 187, 188 (8th Cir.1981).

In Re Ferrell

539 F.3d 1186 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 22, 2008

The court held that Checks-N-Advance violated 15 U.S.C. §§ 1632 (a), 1638(b)(1), and Regulation Z ( 12 C.F.R. § 226.17 (a)(2), (b)). [5] However, relying on Brown v. … It acknowledged and followed both Brown and Baker v. Sunny Chevrolet, Inc., 349 F.3d 862 (6th Cir. 2003). Id. at 785.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lenkurt Electric Co., Inc.

459 F.2d 635 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 28, 1972

The second instance of solicitation (involving employee Brown) followed in a few days. … See generally Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). 6 . Compare Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. NLRB, 357 F.2d 662 (2d Cir. 1966). 7 . Contrast NLRB v.

State of California, California Polytechnic School and California State Board of Equalization v. United States

195 F.2d 530 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 1952

195 F.2d 530 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, California Polytechnic School and California State Board of Equalization, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 13018. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. … Brown, Atty. Gen., James E. Sabine, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward Sumner, Deputy Atty. Gen., State of California, for appellants. Ellis N. Slack, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., A. F. Prescott, Fred E. Youngman, Louise Foster, Sp.

Richard Hunter v. National Mediation Board, Robert Harris, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Jet America Airlines, Inc., Richard Hunter v. National Mediation Board, Robert Harris, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Jet America Airlines, Inc.

754 F.2d 1496 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 5, 1985

Brown." See Railroad Yardmasters v. Harris, 721 F.2d 1332, 1335 (D.C.Cir.1983). Such a delegation is authorized by 45 U.S.C. … Vance v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Chatfield-Anderson Co., Inc., Dba Truss-Span Co.

606 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 11, 1979

However, we cannot approve the Board’s bargaining order in this case. While we are mindful of the admonition that we accord great respect to the Board’s selection of a remedy for unfair labor practices (see N.L.R.B. v. … Although the Board’s order does not set forth its supporting reasons with the desired detail (see N.L.R.B. v.

McCarthy Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

80 F.2d 618 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 1935

See, also, Aiken v. Burnet, 282 U.S. 277, 282 , 51 S.Ct. 148 , 75 L.Ed. 339 ; Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U.S. 283, 287 , 51 S.Ct. 140 , 75 L.Ed. 343 ; United States v. Southern Lumber Co. … . *623 457, 76 L.Ed. 945 ; Commissioner v. Oswego Falls Corp. (C.C.A.2) 71 F.(2d) 673, 677 . The decision of the Board is affirmed.

Philander Salviejo-Fernandez, AKA Philander Salviejo v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

455 F.3d 1063 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 31, 2006

In Brown v. … . *1067 United States v.

In Re: Catalina Cruises, Inc.

137 F.3d 1422 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 10, 1998

CATALINA CRUISES, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Julie LUNA; Bartolome Alcala; Lisa Bolton; Monique Brown; Sylvia Brown; Dawn Dyer; William Groves; Edward Pierce; Melony Pierce; Anthony Tidwell; James Tolbert; Sharon Washington; Caprice Winstead; Luke Brunet; Dena Deck;

Cascade General, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

9 F.3d 731 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 5, 1993

In Fraser & Johnston Co. v. … Under the circumstances of this case, the Board’s order is rational in effectuating the policies of the NLRA and should be enforced. See Virginia Electric & Power Co. v.

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers and Delivery Drivers, Local 690 v. National Labor Relations Board

375 F.2d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 3, 1967

Union v. Brown, 9 Cir., 1961, 284 F.2d 619 , at 624: “Under ordinary circumstances, the decisions of the National Labor Relations Board in representation proceedings are reviewable only in the Courts of Appeal. … Since Leedom v.

Nelson L. Phillips v. City and County of San Francisco: Adult Probation Department of the City and County of San Francisco

491 F.2d 951 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 1974

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … See Meehan v. Macy, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 217 , 392 F.2d 822, 835 (1968) quoted with approval in Waters v. Peterson, infra, at n. 9. 7 .

Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

713 F.2d 1446 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 25, 1983

(BNA) 2347 BILL JOHNSON'S RESTAURANTS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. CA 80-7266. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 25, 1983. … ORDER 3 In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in this case, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2161 , 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983), this matter is remanded to the National Labor Relations Board for further

Corder v. Gates

104 F.3d 247 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 27, 1996

Corder v. Gates, 688 F.Supp. 1418 (C.D.Cal.1988). Plaintiffs and defendant Roy Brown appealed. The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded. Corder v. Gates, 947 F.2d 374 (9th Cir.1991) (“Corder I”). … Corder v. Brown, 25 F.3d 833 (9th Cir.1994) (“Corder II"). After the second remand, the district court awarded plaintiffs $33,041 plus interest in attorney’s fees.

Loehr v. Ventura County Community College District

743 F.2d 1310 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 1984

Brown Act, Cal.Govt.Code §§ 54950-61 (West 1983)), Board policy 2.09(c) (methods of presenting charges), and Board policy 2.14 (due process and submission of complaints to the Board) do not transform Loehr’s expectations … Brown Act, Cal.Govt.Code §§ 54950-61 (West 1983)).

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 73

714 F.2d 870 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 25, 1980

Florida Power & Light Co. v. International Brotherhood of Elec. Workers, 417 U.S. 790, 803 , 94 S.Ct. 2737, 2744 , 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974). … Enforcement of the Board’s order is denied.

National Labor Relations Board v. Big Bear Supermarkets # 3

640 F.2d 924 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 20, 1980

NLRB v. … See Howard Johnson Co. v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Campbell Industries, Inc.

678 F.2d 836 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 4, 1982

O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific Maxon, 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Bumble Bee Seafood v. Director, Office of Wkrs.’, 629 F.2d at 1329; Army & Air Force Exchange Service v. … Greenwood, 585 F.2d 791 (5th Cir. 1978); Presley v. Tinsley Maintenance Service, 529 F.2d 433, 436 (5th Cir. 1976). If the Board departs from this standard, the court must reverse. Bumble Bee Seafood v.