Case law

Claude Reese v. Robert Malone

747 F.3d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 13, 2014

They do not allege facts showing that Browne knew about the problems when he made the statement. And under the core operations inference analysis, 34 REESE V. … The district court noted that the Board did not receive a detailed update about the spill until ten days after Browne’s press conference.

Toddella Brown v. Homestreet Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 12, 2021

The district court properly dismissed Brown’s claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as untimely because Brown did not plead sufficient facts supporting application of the discovery rule. See Lyons v. … Koster v. Harris, 847 F.3d 646, 655–56 (9th Cir. 2017). 10. Brown’s motions for certification, validation, and expedition are denied. (Dkts. 14, 52, 57.)

Kerry Senger v. United States

103 F.3d 1437 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 27, 1996

Franklin v. … Whelchel v.

In Re Disciplinary Action

837 F.2d 869 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 21, 1988

Sigmond, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip E. BROWN; Joseph A. Berg, Benjamin B. Shearer; Paul J. Malapira; Dennis Swanson, Marcus I. … Sigmond v. Brown, 645 F.Supp. 243 (C.D.Cal.1986).

National Labor Relations Board v. Golden State Bottling Company, Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Sacramento

401 F.2d 454 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 1968

National Labor Relations Board v. Sellers (9 CCA 1965), 346 F.2d 625 . The remaining findings of unfair labor practices stem substantially from the April 1 lockout by Golden State. In American Shipbuilding Company v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 1965, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 . His duty was to leave the union alone to work out its own destiny.

Misty Brown v. Louis Dejoy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 19, 2021

No. 3:16-cv-06972-EDL v. MEMORANDUM* LOUIS DEJOY, Post Master General, Defendant-Appellee. … § 1630.2(n)(2)(i)-(iii) (describing why a “job function may be considered essential”); see also Dark v. Curry County, 451 F.3d 1078, 1087 (9th Cir. 2006).

National Labor Relations Board v. United Association of Journeymen

827 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 8, 1987

DISCUSSION 5 An NLRB order will be enforced if the Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence and the Board correctly applied the law. NLRB v. IBEW Local 46, 793 F.2d 1026, 1028 (9th Cir.1986). … The Board's interpretation of the Act is entitled to deference and this court will uphold it if it is reasonably defensible. Id. See also NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local No. 13

549 F.2d 1346 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 15, 1977

The Board’s discretion in fashioning remedies which can fairly be said to “effectuate the policies” of the Act is broad. N.L.R.B. v. … The remedial order is not an abuse of the Board’s discretion. Nor does the requirement that the Union maintain permanent records overstep the Board’s authority. See Local 138, Operating Engineers v.

Aftra, San Diego Local v. National Labor Relations Board

301 F. App'x 730 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 26, 2008

Council v. NLRB, 483 F.3d 628, 633 (9th Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted). … NLRB v. Advanced Stretchforming Int’l Inc., 233 F.3d 1176 , 1180 (9th Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted).

National Labor Relations Board v. Golden State Bottling Company, Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company Ofsacramento

353 F.2d 667 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 1966

National Labor Relations Board v. Sellers (9 CCA 1965), 346 F.2d 625 . The remaining findings of unfair labor practices stem substantially from the April 1 lockout by Golden State. In American Ship Building Company v. … Labor Board v. Brown, 1965, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 . His duty was to leave the union alone to work out its own destiny.

National Labor Relations Board v. Edjo, Inc., D/B/A Jose Costa Trucking

631 F.2d 604 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 28, 1980

THE FACTS The Board adopted the ALJ’s pertinent findings of fact. Since they are supported by substantial evidence, they may not be disturbed by this court. Universal Camera Corp. v. … B. v. Denham, 469 F.2d 239, 244 (9th Cir. 1972).

Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local No. 355 v. National Labor Relations Board

716 F.2d 1249 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 1983

Hamilton v. … See NLRB v.

Hospital & Service Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board

743 F.2d 1417 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 2, 1984

We will not resolve this ambiguity in the NLRB’s decision by substituting the Board counsel’s rationale for that of the Board. See NLRB v. … Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association, 460 U.S. 37, 45 , 103 S.Ct. 948, 955 , 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983); Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. at 461-62, 100 S.Ct. at 2290-91 ; Police Department v.

City of Seattle v. Board of Home Missions of Methodist Protestant Church

138 F. 307 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 29, 1905

Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403 , 25 L. Ed. 206 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Construction & Building Material Teamsters Local No. 291

633 F.2d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 11, 1980

The judge quoted N.L.R.B. v. … See also General Teamsters Local 162 v. N.L.R.B., 568 F.2d 665 , 668-69 (9th Cir. 1978). The Administrative Law Judge also quoted from Teamsters Local 122 (August A.

Teamsters Cannery Local 670 v. National Labor Relations Board

856 F.2d 1250 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 1988

See NLRB v. … NLRB v.

Shayna Lathus v. City of Huntington Beach

56 F.4th 1238 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 5, 2023

Because the advisory board member is the “public face” of the elected official who appointed her to the body, we hold that she “can be fired for purely political reasons.” Hobler v. … City of Boston, 140 F.3d 42, 46 (1st Cir. 1998) (noting “it is enough that the official be involved in policy, even if only as an adviser, implementer, or spokesperson”) (cleaned up); Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc.

633 F.2d 766 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 16, 1980

The Board did not decide the issue. … P. v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 , 83 S.Ct. 328 , 9 L.Ed.2d 405 (1963) and Bates v.

Karen L. Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Lucky Stores, Inc. John Hunt, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants

246 F.3d 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 17, 2001

to prove her ADA claim. 1 Wellington v. … See Truex v.

Button v. Board of Regents of University & Community College System of Nevada

289 F. App'x 964 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 2008

Fuller v. Frank, 916 F.2d 558 , 562 n. 6 (9th Cir.1990). … See e.g., Schroeder v. Owens-Coming Fiberglas Corp., 514 F.2d 901, 903-904 (9th Cir.1975). The Board does not argue that Button’s expert was unqualified.