Case law

H. Liebes & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

90 F.2d 932 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 1937

Commissioner v. Brown (C.C.A. 1) 54 F.(2d) 563 ; Corn Exchange Bank v. United States (CC.A.2) 37 F.(2d) 34 ; Automobile Ins. Co. v. Commissioner (C.C.A.2) 72 F.(2d) 265, 267 ; Commissioner v. Brooklyn R. S. Corp. … Compare Commissioner v. Brown (C.C.A.1) supra; Commissioner v. John Thatcher & Son (C.C.A.2) 76 F.(2d) 900, 902 , supra; Commissioner v. Southeastern Express Co. (C.C.A.5), supra; J. N. Pharr & Sons v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Construction & Building Material Teamsters Local No. 291

633 F.2d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 11, 1980

The judge quoted N.L.R.B. v. … See also General Teamsters Local 162 v. N.L.R.B., 568 F.2d 665 , 668-69 (9th Cir. 1978). The Administrative Law Judge also quoted from Teamsters Local 122 (August A.

National Labor Relations Board v. Hospital & Institutional Workers Union, Local 250

577 F.2d 649 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 3, 1978

Anderson v. Air West, Inc., 542 F.2d 1090, 1093 (9th Cir. 1976). Appellants argue that Hovey v. … However, that case was limited by Hammond Packing Co. v.

Wrenn v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

315 F. App'x 609 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 2, 2009

In denying Wrenn’s ex post facto claim, the Oregon Court of Appeals relied on Butler v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 194 Or.App. 164 , 94 P.3d 149 (2004). … Dep’t of Corr. v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499 , 115 S.Ct. 1597 , 131 L.Ed.2d 588 (1995).

Stephen Turner v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

586 F. App'x 427 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 8, 2014

No. 3:13-cv-01940-CRB v. MEMORANDUM* EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendants - Appellees. … See Thomas v.

Button v. Board of Regents of University & Community College System of Nevada

289 F. App'x 964 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 2008

Fuller v. Frank, 916 F.2d 558 , 562 n. 6 (9th Cir.1990). … See e.g., Schroeder v. Owens-Coming Fiberglas Corp., 514 F.2d 901, 903-904 (9th Cir.1975). The Board does not argue that Button’s expert was unqualified.

Teamsters Cannery Local 670 v. National Labor Relations Board

856 F.2d 1250 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 1988

See NLRB v. … NLRB v.

United States v. Ricco Brown

584 F. App'x 862 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 1, 2014

No. 1:09-cr-00026-DWM v. MEMORANDUM* RICCO LEE BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. … § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Brown’s repeated breaches of the court’s trust. See United States v.

Gary Brown v. Mark Nooth

585 F. App'x 559 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 23, 2014

Fry v. … As the district court aptly noted, “[e]ven without Hartford’s statements, the record clearly showed Petitioner Brown to be an active participant in Ulrich’s detention at the Causey apartment.” Brown v.

Standard Oil Company of California, Western Operations, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

399 F.2d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 20, 1968

In NLRB v. … See also NLRB v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 352 U.S. 938 , 77 S.Ct. 261 , 1 L.Ed.2d 235 reversing 235 F.2d 319 (CA 9).

National Labor Relations Board v. Golden State Bottling Company, Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company Ofsacramento

353 F.2d 667 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 1966

National Labor Relations Board v. Sellers (9 CCA 1965), 346 F.2d 625 . The remaining findings of unfair labor practices stem substantially from the April 1 lockout by Golden State. In American Ship Building Company v. … Labor Board v. Brown, 1965, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 . His duty was to leave the union alone to work out its own destiny.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist.

92 F.2d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 10, 1937

Memphis & Charleston Ry. v. Pace, 282 U.S. 241, 245 , 51 S.Ct. 108 , 75 L.Ed. 315 , 72 A.L.R. 1096 . Regardless of whether the Pace Case overruled Browning v. … Claiborne County v. Brooks, 111 U.S. 400, 410 , 4 S.Ct. 489, 494 , 28 L.Ed. 470 . Aside from Browning v.

Burroughs v. Board of Trustees of the Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers

542 F.2d 1128 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 4, 1976

Lugo v. … In Lee v.

Notrica v. Board Of Supervisors Of San Diego County

925 F.2d 1211 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 20, 1991

925 F.2d 1211 1991-1 Trade Cases 69,349 Leon NOTRICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … In January 1984, the Planning Commission denied the appeal and upheld the Environmental Board's decision. Pursuant to county law, the citizens appealed to the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego (Board).

National Labor Relations Board v. Cannery Workers of Pacific

396 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1968

PER CURIAM: The above-entitled petition for enforcement of the order of June 21,1966, issued by the National Labor Relations Board, is granted on the authority of National Labor Relations Board v.

Big Country Foods, Inc. v. Board Of Education Of The Anchorage School District

868 F.2d 1085 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 28, 1989

Law Rep. 60 BIG COUNTRY FOODS, INC., an Alaska corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT, ANCHORAGE, ALASKA; Department of Agriculture; Richard E. … For this unique proposition, Big Country cites an out-of-circuit district court decision, United Technologies Communications Co. v. Washington County Board, 624 F.Supp. 185, 188 (D.Minn.1985).

Culinary Alliance & Bartenders Union, Local 703, Aflcio v. National Labor Relations Board

488 F.2d 664 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 23, 1974

The first and leading case for the proposition that the Board has the pow *666 er to award compensatory damages in employer-refusal-to-bargain cases is International Union of Elec. Workers v. … See, e. g., Retail Clerks Union, Local 1401 v. NLRB [Zinke’s Foods], 149 U.S.App.D.C. 370 , 463 F.2d 316, 325 (1972); Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. NLRB [Levi Strauss & Co.], 142 U.

Master Transmission Rebuilding Corporation & Master Parts, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

373 F.2d 402 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 15, 1967

And there, as here, the Board found that the employer’s conduct was coercive and that this coercion caused the union to lose its majority status. See the opinion of the Board in this case, reported at 155 N.L.R.B. … Co. v. N.L.R.B., 321 U.S. 702 , 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 (1944). For these reasons, we have concluded that the petition for review should be denied, and that a decree should issue enforcing the Board’s order.

Claude Reese v. Robert Malone

747 F.3d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 13, 2014

They do not allege facts showing that Browne knew about the problems when he made the statement. And under the core operations inference analysis, 34 REESE V. … The district court noted that the Board did not receive a detailed update about the spill until ten days after Browne’s press conference.

Southern Pacific Co. v. Switchmen's Union of North America

356 F.2d 332 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 20, 1965

On Rehearing Before BARNES, MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge: We granted rehearing in this case on petition of appellee, with Judge Barnes replacing the late Judge Orr. … We do not find the Board to have spoken directly to this point.