Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

3.96s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Ambrose Distributing Company

    439 F.2d 720 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 23, 1971

    B. v. Ambrose Distributing Company, 358 F.2d 319 (C.A.9, 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 838 , 87 S.Ct. 86 , 17 L.Ed.2d 72 . … B. v. Ambrose Distributing Company, 382 F.2d 92 (C.A.9, 1967).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weldon E. Wiggins v. Alameda County Board of Supervisors

    54 F.3d 786 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 22, 1995

    WIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16362. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. … See Franklin v. Oregon, 662 F.2d 1337, 1342 (9th Cir 1981). 4 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Holly-General Company, Division of Siegler Corporation

    305 F.2d 670 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 29, 1962

    See Phelps Dodge Corp. v. [National] Labor [Relations] Board, 313 U.S. 177, 192-197 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 ; [National] Labor [Relations] Board v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Keller Industries, Inc.

    434 F.2d 1314 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 22, 1970

    P 11,387 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. KELLER INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent. No. 25037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 22, 1970. … the Board will be enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Construction And Building Material Teamsters Local No. 291

    633 F.2d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 11, 1980

    P 12,486 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor relations board. Before MERRILL and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, * District Judge.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Stevie Lamar Fields v. Jill Brown, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin, Stevie Lamar Fields v. Jill Brown, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin

    465 F.3d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 2006

    465 F.3d 397 Stevie Lamar FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jill BROWN, * Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee. Stevie Lamar Fields, Petitioner-Appellee, v. … Jill Brown, * Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellant. No. 00-99005. No. 00-99006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. September 21, 2006.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Calmat Company v. U.S. Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board Robert E. Germann

    364 F.3d 1117 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 19, 2004

    Servs. v. Herman, 146 F.3d 12, 19-21 (1st Cir.1998); Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. … Barrentine v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Pacesetter Construction Co. v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board

    116 F.3d 436 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 25, 1997

    Co. v. … Co. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, 722 F.2d 1471 (9th Cir.1984). *442 V. We also agree with the district court’s determination that the Board accepted jurisdiction over the repudiation issue.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. W. Carter Maxwell, Dba Pioneer Concrete Co.

    637 F.2d 698 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 26, 1981

    to the Board. … Stephenson v. NLRB, 550 F.2d 535 (9th Cir. 1977). The Board was therefore justified in going forward with the present proceeding. See NLRB v. Thor Power Tool Co., 351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965). 6.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Educatio

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 18, 2023

    Northern District of California, SCHOOL, an unincorporated association; Oakland CHARLOTTE KLARKE; ELIZABETH SINCLAIR, ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION; NANCY ALBARRAN, in her official and personal capacity; HERB ESPIRITU, in his official and personal capacity; PETER GLASSER, in his official and personal capacity; STEPHEN

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. John C. Humphrey, W.C. Garbez, and Robert D. Smith

    759 F.2d 743 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 2, 1985

    Chesher, 678 F.2d at 1357 (quoting United States v. Ochs, 595 F.2d 1247,1258 (2d Cir.1979); see also Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 741-42 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1542-43 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). … See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 745 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1544 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (Powell, J., concurring). The limited role of the balancing test was recently acknowledged in United States v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Birch v. Thompson

    224 F. App'x 705 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

    See also Brown v. … granting relief on Brown’s ex post facto claim).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hooks ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union

    544 F. App'x 657 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 30, 2013

    Finally, although the Board is under no obligation to adopt an Administrative Law Judge’s recommendation, 1 Overstreet v. … If the Board finds that the Port controls the disputed work, ILWU’s invocation of the work-preservation doctrine fails. See NLRB v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Beller v. Middendorf

    632 F.2d 788 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 23, 1980

    In Glines v. Wade, 586 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1978), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. Brown v. … See, e. g., Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348 , 100 S.Ct. 594 , 62 L.Ed.2d 540 (1980). See also Sherwood v. Brown, 619 F.2d 47 (9th Cir.1980).

    Overruled — as noted by 2 later courtsCited 166 timesPublished
  • Bumble Bee Seafoods v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs

    629 F.2d 1327 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 10, 1980

    Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951) (a district court judge, who performed the role now performed by the Board, must affirm the administrative law judge's factfindings if they are … See Presley v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    89 F.3d 586 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 10, 1996

    Furthermore, the Board's reliance on Woelke & Romero Framing v. … NLRB v. Davis, 642 F.2d 350 , 352 (9th Cir.1981). 2 With respect to the unchallenged findings in the Board's order, the Board is entitled to summary enforcement. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald S. VILTRAKIS, Defendant-Appellant

    108 F.3d 1159 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 12, 1997

    Hurtado v. … Board of Natural Resources v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Campbell Soup Company

    378 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 23, 1967

    Before MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge. … Phelps Dodge Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. General Teamsters Local Union No. 324

    296 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 20, 1961

    B. v. Cascade Employers Association, 296 F.2d 42 (9th Cir., October 20, 1961, No. 17012.) On May 18, 1959, the N. L. R. … B. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 331 U.S. 416 , 67 S.Ct. 1274 , 91 L.Ed. 1575 (1947)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,222 William M. McCormick v. The Fund American Companies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

    26 F.3d 869 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 20, 1994

    Co. v. … Grigsby v.

    Cited 95 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.