Case law

James E. Sochin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Dennis S. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

843 F.2d 351 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 29, 1988

Brown v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 968, 998-1000 (1985). … Aerospace Corp., 765 F.2d 1440, 1444 (9th Cir.1985); Nicholson v. Board of Education Torrance Unified School District, 682 F.2d 858, 866 (9th Cir.1982).

Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Educatio

64 F.4th 1024 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 3, 2023

ORDER SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and CALLAHAN, M. … FILED Fellowship of Christian Athletes, et al. v.

The May Department Stores Company, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And

707 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 1983

The Board’s wide discretion in supervising representation elections, and certifying the successful union, is well-established. NLRB v. Advanced Systems, Inc., 681 F.2d 570 (9th Cir.1982). … The Regional Director’s analysis derives from a Board precedent which the Fourth Circuit rejected in NLRB v. Georgetown Dress Corp., 537 F.2d 1239 (4th Cir.1976).

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 21 v. National Labor Relations Board

563 F.3d 418 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 20, 2009

merger was a core business decision under First National Maintenance Corp. v. … . § 160 (e)-(f) ("[N]o objection that has not been urged before the Board ... shall be considered by the Court” except in “extraordinary circumstances.”); Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v.

Johnson v. Board of Trustees of the Boundary County School District No. 101

666 F.3d 561 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 8, 2011

Rather, the basis for Johnson’s discrimination claim is the Board’s failure to accommodate her disability, which is analytically distinct from a claim of disparate treatment or impact under the ADA. See McGary v. … Accordingly, we reject Johnson’s reliance on cases such as Bates and Rohr v.

Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund Board of Trustees v. Michael's Floor Covering, Inc.

801 F.3d 1079 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 11, 2015

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING No. 12-17675 PENSION TRUST FUND BOARD OF TRUSTEES; RESILIENT FLOOR … V.

National Labor Relations Board v. San Clemente Publishing Corporation Coastline Publishers, Inc.

408 F.2d 367 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 1969

The Board affirmed the decision of the trial examiner and ordered the Company to bargain with the Union. The question presented here is whether this case comes within the rule of Brooks v. N. L. R. … B. v. Universal Gear Service Corp., 394 F.2d 396 (6th Cir. 1968) ; N. L. R. B. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 399 F.2d 409 (7th Cir. 1968). The Board’s order is to be enforced. 1 .

Michael Brown v. John Salazar

431 F. App'x 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 2011

at 75-76; Machibroda v. … See Earp v.

Parents Involved In Community Schools v. Seattle School District

294 F.3d 1084 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 2002

of Directors of Seattle Public Schools; Donald Neilson, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Board of Directors of Seattle Public Schools; Steven Brown; Jan Kumasaka; Michael Preston; Nancy Waldman, in their … Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AG, 196 F.3d 1075, 1076 (9th Cir.1999) (quoting Arizonans for Official English v.

Timothy Jon Robles v. Bryn Armstrong, Chairman, State of Nevada Parole Board & the Nevada State Board of Parole Commissioners

24 F.3d 248 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 1994

Timothy Jon ROBLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bryn ARMSTRONG, Chairman, State of Nevada Parole Board & The Nevada State Board of Parole Commissioners, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35654. … See ESP Fidelity Corp. v. Department of Hous. and Urban Dev., 512 F.2d 887, 890 (9th Cir.1975) (this court lacks authority to act against defendants who "have not been named parties ... and have not been served").

National Labor Relations Board v. Glaziers and Glassworkers Local Union No. 1621, A/w International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades

632 F.2d 89 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 10, 1980

8(b)(1)(A), we enforce the Board’s order. … Bricklayers Local 2 v. NLRB, supra, 562 F.2d at 784-86 .

Morton Salt Company v. National Labor Relations Board

472 F.2d 416 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 8, 1972

C., for intervenor. 2 Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SHARP, * District Judge. … consistent herewith. 44 BROWNING, Circuit Judge (concurring in part, dissenting in part): 45 The majority's holding that the Board accurately defined the issues before it seems proper. 46 The majority's further holding that

Birch v. Thompson

224 F. App'x 705 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

See also Brown v. … granting relief on Brown’s ex post facto claim).

Summa Corporation D/B/A Frontier Hotel v. National Labor Relations Board

625 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 12, 1980

II We will enforce the Board’s order if the Board correctly applied the law and if *295 its findings of fact are supported by the record as a whole. NLRB v. … Specifically, we will enforce the Board’s bargaining order if the Board properly overruled Summa’s objections to the election. See Heavenly Valley Ski Area v. NLRB, 552 F.2d 269, 271 (9th Cir. 1977).

California Portland Cement Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

19 F. App'x 683 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 2001

The Board has filed a cross petition for enforcement of its order. … Thus, it is not surprising that the Board did not address the argument. Nor should it be surprising that we decline to do so. See 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); NLRB v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec.

National Labor Relations Board v. Astro Electronics, Inc.

463 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 21, 1972

PER CURIAM: The Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 188 NLRB No. 92 . … Accordingly, the Board’s Application for the enforcement of its Order is GRANTED. 1 1 . AVe reject the respondent’s suggestion that our conclusion should be withheld pending the Supreme Court’s decision in N.L.R.B. v.

Cuevas Nunez v. Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 20, 2023

Where, as here, the Board “expressed agreement with the reasoning of the [immigration judge],” we review both decisions. Kumar v. Holder, 728 F.3d 993, 998 (9th Cir. 2013). … See Ibarra-Flores v.

Stevenson v. Grentec, Inc.

652 F.2d 20 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 27, 1981

In 1971, Stevenson received a patent for a skateboard with a foot depressible lever at one end or at both ends of the board (kick-tail board). … In 1975, Stevenson brought this patent infringement suit against Grentec, Mojo Boards and Brown. The defendants counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment that the patent was invalid as obvious.

Catholic League for Religious & Civil Rights v. City & County of San Francisco

567 F.3d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 3, 2009

See also Brown v. … See McGowan v.

Brown v. Duringer Law Group, Plc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 2025

See Josephs v. Pac. Bell, 443 F.3d 1050, 1062 (9th Cir. 2006). … v.