Case law

United States v. Neil Brown

415 F. App'x 778 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 2011

No. 2:00-cr-00434-GEH v. MEMORANDUM * NEIL R. BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. … See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Cope, 527 F.3d 944, 950 (9th Cir. 2008) (length of term of supervised release is part of the sentence).

National Labor Relations Board v. Vangas, Inc., D/B/A Tahoe Vangas

517 F.2d 747 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 27, 1975

OPINION Before BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, * District Judge. J. … Requiring an offer of reinstatement with recompense for financial losses is within the Board’s remedial powers. N.L.R.B. v.

Brown v. Lafayette Federal Credit Union

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 25, 2025

No. 5:23-cv-01869-TJH-SP Plaintiff - Appellant, v. … Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). We vacate and remand.

Mingtree Restaurant, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

736 F.2d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 1984

N.L.R.B. v. … status. 10 While we appreciate the Board's concerns and "give 'considerable deference' to the Board's expertise in construing and applying the labor laws," Machinists Local 1327 v.

Aminoil v. California State Water Resources Control Board

674 F.2d 1227 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 1982

A., INC., a Delaware corporation, and the Signal Bolsa Corporation, a California corporation, Petitioners-Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. … Crown Simpson Pulp Co. v.

Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal Service

740 F.2d 16 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 9, 1984

ORDER The judgment of the district court is reversed and the matter is remanded for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Franchise Tax Board of California v.

David S. Meik v. National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation Administration

710 F.2d 584 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 14, 1983

Meik then appealed to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). … Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises v. Harris, 633 F.2d 123, 131 (9th Cir.1980).

Chavez v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs

961 F.2d 1409 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 15, 1992

Brown (“Brown”), representing Armstrong, and Catherine Hunt Ruddy (“Ruddy”), representing Keene, into evidence. These declarations stated that Chavez’s case had not been settled. … See United States v.

National Labor Relations Board v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co., Inc.

206 F.2d 857 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 27, 1953

See N.L.R.B. v. Swinerton, 9 Cir., 202 F.2d 511 ; N.L.R.B. v. Cantrall, 9 Cir., 201 F.2d 853 . … Murdock v. United States, 8 Cir., 160 F.2d 358 ; Rogers v. Edward L. Burton Co., 10 Cir., 137 F.2d 284 . The rule of Consolidated Edison Company of New York v.

Zapex Corporation and Bdm Services Company v. National Labor Relations Board

621 F.2d 328 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 1, 1980

NLRB v. Pope Maintenance Corp., 573 F.2d 898, 904 (5th Cir. 1978); Compton v. National Maritime Union, 533 F.2d 1270 , 1275-76 (1st Cir. 1976); Herbert Harvey, Inc. v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 770, 780 (D.C.Cir.1969). … NLRB v. Murray Products, Inc., 584 F.2d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 1978).

David Brown v. State of Hawaii

424 F. App'x 642 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 25, 2011

Most of Brown’s speech was made “pursuant to his official duties” and was therefore unprotected under Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006). … Therefore, Brown’s protected speech could not have motivated Chinen to retaliate against him. See Keyser v. Sacramento City Unified Sch. Dist., 265 F.3d 741, 751 (9th Cir. 2001).

National Labor Relations Board v. Van De Kamp's Holland-Dutch Bakers, Inc.

152 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 1946

Since there has been no “clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally”, (May Department Stores Co. v. … N.L.R.B. v. Fainblatt, 306 U.S. 001 , 307 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 66g, 83 L.Ed. 1014 ; N.L.R.B. v. Richter’s Bakery, 5 Cir., 140 F.2d 870, 871 ; N.L.R.B. v. Schmidt Baking Co., 4 Cir., 122 F.2d 162 ; N.L.R.B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. George M. Hart, Dba San Diego Cabinets

453 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 1972

N.L.R.B. v. Bagel Bakers Council of Greater New York, 434 F.2d 884 , 886-887 (C.A.2, 1970), and cases cited. For, as the Court noted in Publisher’s Association of New York City v. … N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Co., 281 F.2d 893 (C.A.9, 1960).”

Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Thurston County Board of Equalization

724 F.3d 1153 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 2013

THURSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, a political subdivision of the State of Washington; JOHN MORRISON, Thurston County Board of Equalization member, in his official capacity; BRUCE REEVES, Thurston County Board of Equalization … Drye v.

Sahara-Tahoe Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

648 F.2d 553 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 1980

The Board's decision will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole." Id. at 579, citing Sahara-Tahoe Corp. v. … The evidence considered by Sahara-Tahoe did not justify its refusal to bargain. 17 The Board's order is ENFORCED. 1 See, NLRB v. Tahoe Nugget ; Sahara-Tahoe Corporation v. NLRB ; NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Circo Resorts, Inc.

646 F.2d 403 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 10, 1981

P 12,779 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and International Alliance of Theatrical and Stage Employees, Local 363, Intervenor, v. CIRCO RESORTS, INC., d/b/a Circus, Circus, Respondent. No. 79-7632. … NLRB, 632 F.2d 721, 725 (9th Cir. 1980), the determination by the Board that interrogation has been coercive is entitled to be upheld so long as there is substantial evidence to support it. NLRB v. Ft.

Bob Lokey v. H. L. Richardson, Etc.

527 F.2d 949 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 9, 1975

OPINION Before BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, * District Judge. … Peacock v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Neuro Affiliates Company

702 F.2d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 24, 1983

The 1977 stipulation was adopted without change for the June 20, 1978, election. 12 The Board is bound by the stipulation unless it violates applicable statutes or settled Board policy. N.L.R.B. v. … Guenther & Son, Inc. v.

Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

769 F.2d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 23, 1985

NLRB v. Acme Industrial Co., 385 U.S. 432, 435-36 , 87 S.Ct. 565, 567-68 , 17 L.Ed.2d 495 (1967); NLRB v. … This section gives the Board wide discretion in devising remedies. Fiberboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 215-16 , 85 S.Ct. 398, 405 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964).

Allied Concrete, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

607 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 16, 1979

P 11,580 ALLIED CONCRETE, INC., an Arizona Corp., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Building Materials and Miscellaneous Drivers, Teamsters Local No. 83, Intervenors. No. 77-3520. … The Union here had a duty to act with restraint. 14 Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Etc. v. NLRB at 1159. 15 Here the Board found that the Union's picketing met the Moore Dry Dock criteria. "The issue . . .