Case law

In Re Mary Poole, Debtor. Russell A. Brown, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Michael T. Smith

222 F.3d 618 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 25, 2000

See Selling v. … See Schware v. Board of Bar Exam. of N.M., 353 U.S. 232, 238 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957). This means that the attorney must be afforded fair notice of the charge and a meaningful opportunity to respond.

Canlis v. San Joaquin Sheriff's Posse Comitatus

641 F.2d 711 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 1981

Krien repeatedly ordered Brown to drop the shotgun, but Brown refused to do so. After two other officers ordered Brown to drop the gun, he finally did so and was arrested. … Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 311 F.2d 524, 525 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963); Ludwig v. Quebecor Dailies, Inc., 475 F.Supp. 57, 58 (E.D.Pa.1979); Jordan v.

Los Angeles Newspaper Guild, Local 69 v. National Labor Relations Board

443 F.2d 1173 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 7, 1971

The Board’s cross application for enforcement is granted. See the Board’s opinion, reported at 185 NLRB No. 25 .

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Jackson

133 F.3d 694 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 5, 1998

“To the extent that the new Board members, Messrs. … Brown and Peters joined the Century Board at that time, while Edmonds joined in July 1988. .

Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District, (SCAQMD)

498 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 20, 2007

In Hughes v. … Window Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. C & C Plywood Corporation and Veneers, Inc.

413 F.2d 112 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 6, 1969

N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Co., 10 Cir. 1965, 350 F.2d 57, 60 . 5 There must, however, be a “factual basis for the Board’s application of the extension principle”. N.L.R.B. v. … Conley v. Gibson, 1957, 355 U.S. 41, 46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 . See also, Fibre-board Paper Products Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 1964, 379 U.S. 203, 211 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 , 6 A.L.R.3d 1130 . 8 .

National Labor Relations Board v. George M. Hart, Dba San Diego Cabinets

453 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 1972

N.L.R.B. v. Bagel Bakers Council of Greater New York, 434 F.2d 884 , 886-887 (C.A.2, 1970), and cases cited. For, as the Court noted in Publisher’s Association of New York City v. … N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Co., 281 F.2d 893 (C.A.9, 1960).”

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

530 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 25, 1976

The narrow issue before us is whether the Board abused its discretion in deferring to the decision of the arbitrator and in dismissing the unfair labor practice complaint. … We can find no basis upon which to conclude that the Board abused its discretion in deferring to the arbitrator. (E .g., Carey v. Westinghouse (1963) 375 U.S. 261 , 84 S.Ct. 401 , 11 L.Ed.2d 320 ; Spielberg Mfg.

United States v. Rhonda Brown, Aka: Sofiya Omari, and Bill Baker, Aka: Mtina Burti Omari

832 F.2d 128 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 10, 1987

The Constitutionality of the Federal Contempt Statute Appellant Brown argues that, under Connally v. … Appellant Brown does not raise and we do not consider the question whether the contempt statute implicates First Amendment rights. See Appellant Brown’s Opening Brief at 14-17. Cf. Kolender v.

Press Democrat Publishing Co., Times Herald, Inc., Amphlett Printing Company, and Brown Newspaper Publishing Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, San Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild, Local 52, the Newspaper Guild, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

629 F.2d 1320 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 8, 1980

P 12,320 PRESS DEMOCRAT PUBLISHING CO., Times Herald, Inc., Amphlett Printing Company, and Brown Newspaper Publishing Co., Inc., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … .; and Brown Newspaper Publishing Co. (collectively, the "Employers"), which publish several suburban newspapers in the Bay Area.

In Re: Charles W. Brown Janette Brown, Debtors, Stanley Ma Jenny Tong Wai K. Choi v. Charles W. Brown Janette Brown

145 F.3d 1336 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 20, 1998

BROWN; Janette Brown, Debtors, Stanley MA; Jenny Tong; Wai K. Choi, Appellants, v. Charles W. BROWN; Janette Brown, Appellees. No. 96-56460. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 20, 1998. … The BAP affirmed the judgment of the Bankruptcy Court that the landlords' state court judgments against the Browns are dischargeable.

Christie v. Iopa

176 F.3d 1231 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 1999

.”); see also Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. … the Board.

National Labor Relations Board v. Harry Magnusen, Dba North Star Refrigerator Co.

523 F.2d 643 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 19, 1975

Commonwealth Foods, Inc., 506 F.2d 1065 (4th Cir. 1974) (employees illegally fired should not be reinstated if on rehearing the Board determines that they had been engaging in theft from their employer); NLRB v. … When an employee disavows the remedy of reinstatement with backpay the Board should not order it. NLRB v. Coletti Color Prints, Inc., 387 F.2d 298, 306 (2d Cir. 1967); Colonie Fibre Co. v.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor of the State of California v. Environmental Protection Agency, Trustees of the California State University & Colleges, Etc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board v. Environmental Protection Agency

521 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 15, 1975

BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. TRUSTEES OF the CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY & COLLEGES, etc., Petitioner, v. … Turner v. Goolsby, 255 F.Supp. 724, 730, 733-34 (S.D.Ga.1966) 23 Harvest v. Board of Public Instruction, 312 F.Supp. 269, 278 (M.D. Fla. 1970) 24 Wyatt v. Stickney, 344 F.Supp. 373, 377-78 (M.D.

Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association

295 F.2d 403 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 17, 1961

See section 6(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1005 -(c); Lee v. Federal Maritime Board,. 9 Cir., 284 F.2d 577, 581 . … See F.T.C. v. Cement Institute, 333 U.S. 683, 701 , 68 S.Ct. 793 , 92 L.Ed. 1010 ; United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 421 , 61 S.Ct. 999 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 : Marquette Cement Mfg. Co. v.

Parents Involved in Seattle School District

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 22, 2007

Seattle official capacity as Vice President ORDER of the Board of Directors of Seattle Public Schools; STEVEN BROWN; JAN KUMASAKA; MICHAEL PRESTON; NANCY WALDMAN, in their official capacities as members of the … board of Directors, Defendants-Counter-Claimants- Appellees

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 340

780 F.2d 1489 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 1986

Supervisor Status The question of supervisor status is a factual one and the determination of the Board is entitled to great deference and need only meet the substantial evidence test. NLRB v. … See Florida Power & Light v. IBEW, 417 U.S. 790 , 94 S.Ct. 2737 , 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1970). The Board found that Shoux’s duties of job assignments and lay-off decisions qualified him for supervisor status.

Walker v. Rothschild International Stevedoring Co.

526 F.2d 1137 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 31, 1975

Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504 -508, 71 S.Ct. 470 -472, 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Association, 390 U.S. 459 , 88 S.Ct. 1140 , 20 L.Ed.2d 30 (1968); Portland Stevedoring Company v. … See McKinney v.

Stone Boat Yard v. National Labor Relations Board

715 F.2d 441 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 6, 1983

v. … E.g., Peerless Roofing Co. v. NLRB, 641 F.2d at 736 ; NLRB v.

Castillo v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

171 F. App'x 650 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 17, 2006

Ass’n of Naturopathic Physicians v. Hayhurst, 227 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir.2000). We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion (“Rule 60(b) motion”). … See Bateman v. United States Postal Serv., 231 F.3d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir.2000).