Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

4.85s

  • Seiu, United Healthcare Workers-West v. National Labor Relations Board

    574 F.3d 1213 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 3, 2009

    OPINION SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: This union petition for review and National Labor Rela- tions Board (“NLRB”) cross-petition for enforcement concern SEIU v. … SEIU v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Peter Ward Pace

    454 F.2d 351 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 10, 1972

    See United States v. Schrader, 435 F.2d 854, 855 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Lloyd, supra,, 431 F.2d at 171 . … See United States v. Brown, 438 F.2d 1115 (9th Cir. 1971); Briggs v. United States, 397 F. 2d 370 (9th Cir. 1968).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Sterling Cunio v. Kate Brown

    692 F. App'x 464 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 2017

    No. 6:14-cv-01647-TC v. … Meredith v. Oregon, 321 F.3d 807, 818 (9th Cir. 2003).

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Scintilla Power Corporation, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And

    707 F.2d 419 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 1, 1983

    The Board’s determination is within its area of expertise and is entitled to great deference. It should not be overturned unless the Board has abused its discretion. The May Department Stores Co., at 430; NLRB v. … The Board argues that the employer waived its argument that it should have had a hearing on its allegations by not seeking a hearing before the Board, under the principle of NLRB v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. MacMillan Ring-Free Oil Co., Inc.

    394 F.2d 26 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 10, 1968

    The Board has ruled that the Act “does not permit an employer to secure * * * a dominant position at the bargaining table by means of unreasonable delay.” Burgie Vinegar Co., 71 N.L.R.B. 829 , 830 (1946); cf. NLRB v. … Commenting on similar conduct in NLRB v. Generac Corp., 354 F.2d 625, 628 (1965), the Seventh Circuit quoted its opinion in Inland Lime & Stone Co. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Bollinger v. Oregon State Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    86 F. App'x 259 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 22, 2003

    See Heck v. … See Bermudez v. Duenas, 936 F.2d 1064, 1066 (9th Cir.1991). Rather, Bollinger contends that the Board ordered parole *262 without statutory authority to retard his good-time release date.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hal Brown, Jr., United States of America v. Michael F. Tobey

    936 F.2d 1042 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 27, 1991

    United States v. Stenberg, 803 F.2d 422, 433 (9th Cir.1986). In United States v. … Brown and Tobey contend that this holding is inconsistent with two prior cases from our circuit, United States v. Krasn, 614 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir.1980), and United States v. Miller, 771 F.2d 1219 (9th Cir.1985).

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Feed and Supply Center, Inc.

    294 F.2d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 1961

    At the hearing before the trial examiner of the Board respondent offered no witnesses and no testimony concerning the “financing difficulties” of respondent. In National Labor Relations Board v. … B. v. National Shoes, 2 Cir., 1953, 208 F.2d 688 ; N. L. R. B. v. Shannon, 9 Cir., 1953, 208 F.2d 545 ; N. L. R. B. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Hercules Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Hercules Powder Company

    146 F.3d 1071 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 22, 1998

    See, e.g., Moravian School Advisory Board of St. Thomas v. Rawlins, 70 F.3d 270, 274 (3d Cir.1995) (federal court may not exercise its inherent authority in a manner inconsistent with a rule or statute); G. … We take judicial notice of Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Brown & Bryant, Inc., et al., No. CIV F-98 5050.

    Cited 90 timesPublished
  • Quality Inn Waikiki v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Quality Inn Waikiki

    783 F.2d 1444 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 4, 1986

    STANDARD OF REVIEW We will enforce the Board’s order if the Board correctly applied the law and if substantial evidence in the record viewed as a whole supports the Board’s findings of fact. NLRB v. … See NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shelly & Anderson Furniture Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    497 F.2d 1200 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 20, 1974

    (Company) petitioned this court to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board. 199 N.L.R.B. No. 31 (Sept. 22, 1972). *1202 The Board cross-petitioned for enforcement of its order. … The Company’s petition to set aside the Board’s order is denied. The Board's cross-petition for enforcement is granted. Enforced.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Spangler v. Pasadena City Board Of Education

    519 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 1975

    Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 299-300 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II). " . . . … "De jure" and "de facto" are only adjectives that give some attempted "legal" distinction to the aims of Brown v. Board of Education I, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), and Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Franklin J. Reno v. National Transportation Safety Board Federal Aviation Administration

    45 F.3d 1375 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 25, 1995

    Reno (“Reno”) petitions for judicial review from a final order of the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”), suspending his commercial pilot certificate for 10 days. … In Administrator v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • United States v. Charles Isaac Kirkland, United States of America v. Harold Edward Brown

    637 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 23, 1980

    The Tenth Circuit cases have been followed by other circuits, United States v. LaBare, supra, and United States v. Tanner, 571 F.2d 334 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Cleveland v. … United States v. Kirkland is affirmed; United States v. Brown is reversed and remanded for a new trial or other appropriate proceedings. 2 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ward v. Board of Equalization of California (In re Woodworkers)

    204 F.3d 888 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 23, 2000

    The Ward Appeal Board of Equalization of California v. Ward is a chapter 11 case in which debtor *890 John Ward (“Ward”), doing business as Artisan Woodworkers, appeals from the judgment of the BAP. … Judgment The judgment of the BAP in Board of Equalization of California v. Ward is AFFIRMED. The judgment of the district court in United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kevin Michael Matthews v. Oregon State Board Of Higher Education

    220 F.3d 1165 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 2000

    See Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 259 (1978); Brady v. Gebbie, 859 F.2d 1543, 1547 (9th Cir. 1988). … Brady, 859 F.2d at 1547 -48 (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union & Local 27

    514 F.2d 481 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 15, 1975

    The Board may, in its discretion, defer to an arbitration award which relates to an unfair labor practice complaint pending before the Board. Carey v. … Moving and Trucking Co. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • United States v. Linda L. Brown, United States of America v. Jerry Thompson Payne

    455 F.2d 1201 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 30, 1972

    With him at the time was appellant *1203 Brown who accompanied him to F.B.I. headquarters and was thereafter formally arrested. … Aguilar v. Texas, supra.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Board of Equalization v. Cool Fuel, Inc.

    117 F. App'x 514 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 24, 2004

    Heiniger v. City of Phoenix, 625 F.2d 842 -43 (9th Cir.1980); Garter-Bare Co. v. … See Vice v. Thacker, 30 Cal.2d 84 , 180 P.2d 4 (1947). This argument lacks merit.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Takahashi v. Board of Trustees of Livingston Union School District

    783 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 21, 1986

    California Teachers Ass’n. v. Governing Board, 144 Cal. App.3d 27 , 192 Cal.Rptr. 358 (1983). … In Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 897-98 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984), the Court explicitly extended the rule of Allen v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.