Case law

Debbie and Doreen Soria v. Oxnard School District Board of Trustees

488 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 27, 1973

First, citing Brown v. … The Court emphasized that the differentiating factor between so-called de facto segregation and the de jure segregation held constitutionálly impermissible in Brown v.

Local Union No. 76 v. National Labor Relations Board

742 F.2d 498 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 1984

The Board affirmed that decision. ANALYSIS I. … If the Board has applied the proper legal standards, we will affirm its findings if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. Carpenters Local )70 v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 1360, 1362-63 (9th Cir. 1977). II.

National Labor Relations Board v. Big Bear Supermarkets 3

640 F.2d 924 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 1980

Moreover, in light of the special expertise of the Board, we will defer to the reasonable derivative inferences drawn by the Board from credited evidence. Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. … v.

Union Flights, Inc., a California Corporation v. Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration

957 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 21, 1992

Furthermore, the Board’s paramount interest in maintaining air safety authorizes it to design hearing and appeal procedures that will resolve claims as speedily as possible. Id. (citing Brown v. National Transp. … Brown, 599 F.2d 639, 648 (5th Cir.1979)), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 937 , 110 S.Ct. 333 , 107 L.Ed.2d 322 (1989).

National Labor Relations Board v. A-Plus Roofing, Inc. Phyllis Wesson

39 F.3d 1410 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 28, 1994

In support of this reasoning, the Board relies on United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 , 100 S.Ct. 2406 , 65 L.Ed.2d 424 (1980), which upheld the constitutionality of another part of § 636(b). … The magistrate’s order refers simply to “[t]he Board’s request for criminal contempt.” 1/9/92- Order at 1.

United States v. Michael Francis O'Neill

476 F.2d 295 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 1973

United States v. Stacey, 441 F. 2d 508, 510 (9th Cir. 1971); United States ex rel. Brown v. Resor, 429 F.2d 1340, 1343 (10th Cir. 1970). Appellant states he satisfied both conditions. … Where the classification is not reopened, the board must specifically find that the claim is either factually *297 insufficient or matured before he received the induction order. United States ex rel. Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Maywood Do-Nut Co., Inc.

659 F.2d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 13, 1981

We therefore affirm the Board’s order. Seattle First National Bank v. NLRB, 638 F.2d 1221, 1226 (9th Cir. 1981); K-Mart Corp. v. NLRB, 626 F.2d 704, 706 (9th Cir. 1980); Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. … That ruling is a permissible exercise of the Board’s discretion. The Board’s order is enforced. 1 . The Board may announce such a principle in an adjudicative proceeding. NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Searle Auto Glass, Inc.

762 F.2d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 4, 1985

See NLRB v. … See NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. B. C. Hawk Chevrolet, Inc.

582 F.2d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 1978

FACTS: In August, 1974, the Company acquired an automobile dealership in Issaquah, Washington, formerly operated as Charlie Brown Chevrolet. … Brooks v. N.L.R.B., 348 U.S. 96 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 (1954); Tahoe Nugget, Inc., supra; N.L.R.B. v. Lee Office Equipment, 572 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1978); N.L.R.B. v.

Atlantic-Pacific Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

52 F.3d 260 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 11, 1995

U.S. v. Brown, 562 F.2d 1144 , 1148 (9th Cir.1977). III. … Joanna Cotton Mills v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Victory Plating Works, Inc.

325 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 22, 1963

The Board’s decision and order are reported at 140 NLRB No. 34 . … The decision and order of the Board fully sets forth the factual background and the considerations upon which the Board’s findings and conclusions were based.

Cascade Employers' Association, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

404 F.2d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 10, 1968

Before HAMLIN, BROWNING and CARTER, Circuit Judges. … This court upheld the Board's decision because the legality of the contract had not been raised in the Board proceedings. N.L.R.B. v.

Raul Loya v. Desert Sands Unified School District, a Governmental Agency & Harold Schoenfeld

721 F.2d 279 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 2, 1983

Connick v. Meyers, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 1690 n. 7, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); see also Nicholson v. Board of Education, 682 F.2d 858 , 865 n. 8 (9th Cir.1982); Bernasconi v. … See Brown v.

Ashton Jones v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona

436 F.2d 618 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 21, 1970

Jones v. Board of Regents, 397 F.2d 259 (9th Cir. 1968). … Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 , 86 S.Ct. 719 , 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966); Henry v. Rock Hill, 376 U.S. 776 , 84 S.Ct. 1042 , 12 L.Ed.2d 79 (1964); Fields v.

Gary L. Fest v. Ronald L. Bartee, Chairman, Nebraska Parole Board

804 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 14, 1986

Article V(a). Under the compact the Nevada officials are not responsible for the unfavorable parole decisions. … The Nevada Parole Board is merely a conduit of information for the Nebraska Parole Board, not the principal in this conflict.

National Labor Relations Board v. Swain and Morris Construction Co.

431 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 6, 1970

Examiner or the Board, and no showing is made that extraordinary circumstances prevented so doing. Cascade Employers’ Assoc. v. N.L.R.B., 404 F.2d 490 (9th Cir. 1968). … Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 262 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966).

Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

115 F.3d 636 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 15, 1997

Furthermore, the Board’s reliance on Woelke & Romero Framing v. … NLRB v. Davis, 642 F.2d 350 , 352 (9th Cir.1981). . With respect to the unchallenged findings in the Board’s order, the Board is entitled to summary enforcement. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v.

William T. Brady James Cardwell Dar-Kel Corporation v. Chester P. Brown, and Lorna Brown De Mena Eric Brown Castelazo Nelly Lozano De Brown, and Maria De Los Angeles Castelazo De Brown, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. Hotel Las Arenas, S.A. De C v. Counter-Defendant-Appellee. William T. Brady James Cardwell Dar-Kel Corporation v. Chester P. Brown, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Hotel Las Arenas, S.A. De C v. Cross-Defendant-Appellee

51 F.3d 810 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 21, 1995

BROWN, Defendant, and Lorna Brown de Mena; Eric Brown Castelazo; Nelly Lozano de Brown, Defendants-Appellants, and Maria de Los Angeles Castelazo de Brown, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, v. … Richmark Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sun Hardware Company, Inc.

422 F.2d 1296 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 11, 1970

Petitioner, the National Labor Relations Board (Board), seeks enforcement of its decision and order of November 26, 1968 against respondent, Sun Hardware Company, Inc., (Sun), which was found to have engaged in unfair labor … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v. Miller Redwood Co., 407 F.2d 1366, 1369 (9th Cir. 1969).

Texas Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

135 F.2d 562 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 1943

The Board cross-petitions for the enforcement of its order. A Board order based on Rosen’s two discharges was before us in petitioner’s former petition, and considered in our opinion in Texas Company v. N. L. R. … On the return of the case to the Board it set aside its order based on Rosen’s discharges. The case was reargued before the Board on the same record as considered in our first hearing here.