Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. State Center Warehouse & Cold Storage Co.

    193 F.2d 156 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 27, 1951

    This matter is here on petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order directed against respondent. … Following receipt of the latter’s report it was officially advised that the Union had petitioned the Board for an election.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Muldrow v. Governing Board of Peralta Community College District

    624 F.2d 192 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 21, 1980

    624 F.2d 192 Muldrow v. Governing Board of Peralta Community College District 78-2045, 79-4122 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 7/21/80 1 N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herrig v. National Transportation Safety Board of United States

    594 F.2d 242 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 22, 1979

    594 F.2d 242 Herrig v. National Transportation Safety Board of United States No. 77-2472 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 2/22/79 1 N.T.S.R.B. DISMISSED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hitchcock v. Army Board for Correction of Military Records

    546 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 4, 1976

    546 F.2d 426 Hitchcock v. Army Board for Correction of Military Records No. 75-2703 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 11/4/76 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. California State Automobile Association

    442 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 12, 1971

    PER CURIAM: This is an application by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) to enforce its order against respondent California State Automobile Association (the “Company”) based on the Board’s findings that the … The Board’s order will be enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp

    672 F.2d 921 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 15, 1982

    672 F.2d 921 California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. 80-5737 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 1/15/82 1 S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Advance Carbon Products, Inc.

    489 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 1974

    *733 ORDER The application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its Order is granted. The Board’s Order appears in 198 N.L.R.B. 105 . The Board will prepare the necessary Order.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Convalescent Hospital, Inc.

    453 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 1972

    PER CURIAM: The Board’s proposed order will be enforced. The Board will present a self-sufficient judgment or decree. We find respondent’s objections not well taken.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Dependable Wholesale Company, Inc.

    211 F.2d 407 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 1954

    PER CURIAM This case is before the court on petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order is-sued against respondent. … We have reviewed the record and are of opinion that the findings of the Board are amply supported.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Union Die Casting Co.

    102 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 27, 1939

    Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered that a decree be filed and entered herein enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Meadow Valley Lumber Co.

    101 F.2d 1014 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 6, 1939

    Upon motion of counsel for petitioner, counsel for respondent consenting thereto, ordered -petition' to enforce order of the National Labor Relations Board granted; that a judgment be entered enforcing said order, and certified

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Channel Islands Development Corp

    722 F.2d 746 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 14, 1983

    (BNA) 2904 National Labor Relations Board v. Channel Islands Development Corp. NO. 82-7304 United States Court of Appeals, ninth Circuit. NOV 14, 1983 1 Appeal From: N.L.R.B. 2 ORDER ENFORCED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Neal v. Board of Trustees of the California State Universities

    51 F. App'x 736 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 26, 2002

    See Neal v. Board of Trustees, 198 F.3d 763 (9th Cir.1999). … See Wolfson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. International Association of Bridge

    454 F.2d 1175 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 1972

    P 12,448 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL AND ORNAMENTAL REINFORCED IRON WORKERS, RIGGERS & MACHINERY MOVERS, LOCAL UNION 377, AFL-CIO, Respondent. … The Board's Order is reported at 189 NLRB No. 14 , 1971 CCH NLRB p 22,838 (1971). 2 Our review of the record convinces us that there was substantial evidence to support the Board's critical factual determinations.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. International Ass'n of Bridge

    454 F.2d 1175 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 1972

    PER CURIAM: The petitioning Board issued an Order based upon its finding that the respondent union had violated section 8(b) (2) and (1) (A) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. … The Board’s Order is reported at 189 NLRB No. 14 , 1971 CCH NLRB 22,838 (1971). Our review of the record convinces us that there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s critical factual determinations.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Hartford Insurance Group v. National Labor Relations Board

    434 F.2d 1312 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 18, 1970

    PER CURIAM: Petitioner, The Hartford Insurance Group (“Hartford”), seeks to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, 1 and the Board seeks enforcement of its order. … The only questions on appeal concern the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Board’s findings of fact and thus the Board’s order.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Automatic Screw Machine Co.

    143 F.2d 598 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 12, 1944

    Upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board for entry of a decree enforc *599 ing its order, herein, respondent consenting to entry of such decree, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered petition granted and decree … filed and entered enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board and that a certified copy of such decree be forthwith issued to the respective parties.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Trade of San Francisco v. Swiss Credit Bank

    597 F.2d 146 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 11, 1979

    See, e. g., Courtaulds North America, Inc. v. … Bank v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Cool Fuel Inc. v. Board of Equalization

    300 F. App'x 452 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 19, 2008

    United States v. Kellington, 217 F.3d 1084, 1092 (9th Cir.2000). Although matters that were adjudicated on the first appeal are no longer open to reexamination, Coleman Co. v. Holly Mfg. … See United States v. Washington, 394 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir.2005). For the forgoing reasons the Bankruptcy Court’s entry of judgment in favor of the Board and its denial of Cool Fuel’s Rule 60(b) motions are AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawrence Abram Benson, D.D.S. v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners

    673 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 29, 1982

    The doctrine stems from Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), where *275 California’s cartel program for marketing raisins was held lawful. … There the Court reviewed the cases applying the doctrine and concluded: “These decisions establish two standards for antitrust immunity under Parker v. Brown.

    Cited 40 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.