Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union

431 F.2d 872 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 1970

See NLRB v. General Motors Corp., 373 U.S. 734, 743 , 83 S.Ct. 1453 , 10 L.Ed.2d 670 (1963); NLRB v. National Automotive Fibres, Inc., 277 F.2d 779 (9th Cir. 1960); NLRB v. … The order of the Board is enforced.

Crenshaw v. Allen

196 F. 292 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 6, 1912

Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown, 196 U. S. 502, 508 , 25 Sup. Ct. 339, 49 L. … In Re Miller and Brown (D.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific International Rice Mills, Inc.

594 F.2d 1323 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 17, 1979

B. v. International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union & Local 27, 514 F.2d 481, 483 (9th Cir. 1975); N. L. R. B. v. Luisi Truck Lines, 384 F.2d 842, 846 (9th Cir. 1967). … B. v. Decoto Aircraft, Inc., 512 F.2d 758, 761 (9th Cir. 1975).

National Labor Relations Board v. C & C Roofing Supply, Inc.

569 F.3d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 25, 2009

It is conceded that the Board is not free to ignore federal statutes or policies outside the National Labor Relations Act. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. … See Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB, 467 U.S. 883, 903 , 104 S.Ct. 2803 , 81 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984).

William J. Brown, Iii v. Mci Worldcom Network Services, Inc.

277 F.3d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 17, 2002

BROWN, III, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. … Lowden v. SimondsShields Lonsdale Grain Co., 306 U.S. 516, 520 (1939). See also AT&T Corp. v.

Polynesian Cultural Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

600 F.2d 1327 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 20, 1979

Long v. IRS, 596 F.2d 362, 370 (9th Cir. 1979). All of these factors militate against a fee award to PCC. The Board’s claim of exemption was not only reasonable but correct. … Blue v. Bureau of Prisons, 570 F.2d 529, 534 (5th Cir. 1978).

Brenda Brown v. City of Tucson, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Arizona

336 F.3d 1181 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 2003

In Walker v. … See Lovejoy-Wilson v.

Don Patrick Nicholson v. Board of Education Torrance Unified School District

682 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 1982

See Simard v. Board of Educ., 473 F.2d 988, 996 (2d Cir. 1973). … Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

National Labor Relations Board v. Cen-Vi-Ro Pipe Corporation

457 F.2d 775 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 14, 1972

“We think there can be no doubt, speaking generally, of the Board’s power to enforce such a policy.” NLRB v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 9 Cir. 1952, 195 F.2d 141, 144 , quoted in NLRB v. … The board is the fact finder. It inferred that Edgerly quit in anticipation of being discharged by reason of the contract. We cannot say that the Board was wrong. The order will be enforced.

Burnett v. Lampert

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 27, 2005

However, at the time the court was considering Brown’s federal habeas petition, Brown had not yet been released on parole but remained imprisoned as a direct result of “the Board[’s] retroactive[ ] appli[cation of] a version … of a parole statute enacted after [Brown perpetrated his] crimes . . . .”

Brice v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

538 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 14, 1976

538 F.2d 334 Brice v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System No. 74-1750 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 1/14/76 1 Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System AFFIRMED

National Labor Relations Board v. Kit Manufacturing Company, Inc.

319 F.2d 857 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 12, 1963

The decision and order of the *858 board are reported at No. 138 N.L.R.B., No. 123 (1962). … We have carefully examined the record and we conclude that the findings of the trial examiner, adopted by the board, are supported by substantial evidence, and that the decision of the board is correct for the reasons stated

National Labor Relations Board v. Red River Lumber Co.

110 F.2d 810 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 9, 1940

We gave opportunity for filing additional evidence by the Board and by the respondent with relation to these latter charges. … We had not made a final order in the matter at the time of the withdrawal by the Board of the charges with relation to Payne and Kougianos.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co.

154 F.2d 112 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 1946

The Board petitions for enforcement of an order against respondent. Respondent was duly served and has not appeared. … Its default is ordered and entered and, on motion of the Board, we order a decree entered for the enforcement of the Board's order.

National Labor Relations Board v. ATC, LLC

309 F. App'x 98 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 16, 2009

These facts are sufficient to sustain the Board’s finding of coercive interrogation. NLRB v. Los Angeles New Hosp., 640 F.2d 1017, 1019-20 (9th Cir. 1981). … NLRB v. Associated Gen.

Bacus v. Palo Verde Unified School District Board of Education

52 F. App'x 355 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 3, 2002

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). We need not determine whether prayers at school board meetings are more like prayers in state legislatures, as in Marsh v. … Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 , 103 S.Ct. 3330 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983), or more like prayers in schoolrooms, as Coles v. Cleveland Board of Education, 171 F.3d 369 (6th Cir.1999).

Debbie and Doreen Soria v. Oxnard School District Board of Trustees

488 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 27, 1973

First, citing Brown v. … The Court emphasized that the differentiating factor between so-called de facto segregation and the de jure segregation held constitutionálly impermissible in Brown v.

Smith v. Board of Prison Term Personnel

308 F. App'x 218 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 15, 2009

Export Group v. Reef Indus., Inc., 54 F.3d 1466, 1469 (9th Cir.1995). We affirm. The district court properly denied Smith’s motions to void the judgment because he failed to present any coherent basis for relief. … See United States v.

Jones v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

103 F.2d 681 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 2, 1939

Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U.S. 445, 449 , 50 S.Ct. 202, 203 , 74 L.Ed. 538 , 67 A.L.R. 1010 . See also Monmouth Plumbing Supply Co., Inc., v. United States, D.C. Fla., 4 F.Supp. 349, 350 ; Brown v. … “The only question of law presented in review is whether the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence.” Brown v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 94 F.2d 101, 103 . See also Royal Packing Co. v.

Northern Montana Health Care Center v. National Labor Relations Board

178 F.3d 1089 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 1999

We employ the substantial evidence test even if the Board’s decision differs materially from the ALJ’s, although we may consider the difference as part of our review. Universal Camera Corp. v. … Although “[a]etions before the Board are not subject to technical pleading requirements that govern private lawsuits[,]” NLRB v.