Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.10s
Certified Building Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
528 F.2d 968 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 23, 1976
The record supports the Board’s finding that the corporation is Fidler’s alter ego. Accordingly, in a board proceeding of this kind, service upon the corporation is the equivalent of service upon the individual. … See N.L.R.B. v. Deena Artware, Inc., 310 F.2d 470 (6th Cir. 1962). The Board will present an appropriate enforcing order upon which a judgment will be entered. Affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. ATC, LLC
309 F. App'x 98 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 16, 2009
These facts are sufficient to sustain the Board’s finding of coercive interrogation. NLRB v. Los Angeles New Hosp., 640 F.2d 1017, 1019-20 (9th Cir. 1981). … NLRB v. Associated Gen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBacus v. Palo Verde Unified School District Board of Education
52 F. App'x 355 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 3, 2002
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). We need not determine whether prayers at school board meetings are more like prayers in state legislatures, as in Marsh v. … Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 , 103 S.Ct. 3330 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983), or more like prayers in schoolrooms, as Coles v. Cleveland Board of Education, 171 F.3d 369 (6th Cir.1999).
Cited 18 timesPublishedGeneral Motors Corp. v. California State Board of Equalization
815 F.2d 1305 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 1987
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge: Appellants, the California State Board of Equalization, board members, and various state officials, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, General Motors Corporation … As to the individual appellants, therefore, the district court’s injunction may be permissible; but as to appellant Board, a state agency, the injunction must be vacated and the case dismissed. See V.O. Motors, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Circle a & W Products Company
647 F.2d 924 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 8, 1981
Rather, the Board has formulated the rule and thus has the principal discretion to waive or apply it in order to effectuate its policy underpinning. Local 1545, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners v. … .); Leedom v. Local 108, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 278 F.2d 237 , 241-43 (D.C.Cir.1960).
Cited 12 timesPublishedBorchers v. Arizona Board of Executive Clemency
201 F. App'x 463 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 13, 2006
Borchers appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of members of the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency (“the Board”) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the Ex Post Facto and Due … See McQuillion v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLocal Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas v. NLRB
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 2008
STANDARD OF REVIEW The Board’s interpretation of the Act is accorded consider- able deference as long as it is “rational and consistent” with the statute. NLRB v. … BD v. NLRB not so coercive or unusual that it rose to the level of unlawful surveillance. Id. [5] We defer to the Board’s conclusion that Ms. Sapien’s and Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Romona's Mexican Food Products, Inc.
531 F.2d 390 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 26, 1975
OPINION Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and EAST, * Senior District Judge. PER CURIAM. … For once, “it is established that the Board correctly found that there had been unfair labor practices, its selection of a remedy is accorded great deference. NLRB v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. C & C Packing Company
405 F.2d 935 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 1969
The Board agrees that the authorization cards must represent the intent of the signers. N.L.R.B. v. Dan Howard, 7 Cir., 390 F.2d 304 . … N.L.R.B. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 6 Cir., 341 F.2d 750 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedGeneral Motors Corporation v. California State Board Of Equalization
815 F.2d 1305 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 1987
815 F.2d 1305 55 USLW 2611 , 9 Employee Benefits Ca 1159 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; American National Red Cross; Jasper Ballance; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION; William M. … KENNEDY, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellants, the California State Board of Equalization, board members, and various state officials, appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, General Motors Corporation
Cited 1 timesPublishedChipman Freight Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
843 F.2d 1224 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 1988
V Chipman claims that the Board’s reliance upon the decision in Production Workers Local 707 v. NLRB, 793 F.2d 323 (D.C.Cir.1986), is misplaced. We disagree. … In Soft Drink Workers Local 812 v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Ed Chandler Ford, Inc.
718 F.2d 892 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 1983
In NLRB v. … Therefore, that part of the Board’s order, which relates to the findings of unfair labor practices, is entitled to enforcement. NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Cadillac Steel Products Corporation
355 F.2d 191 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 10, 1966
The Board’s decision and order are reported at 149 NLRB No. 103 . … The case is controlled by our decision in NLRB v. Carlton Wood Prod. Co., 9 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 863 . Here, the agreement makes explicit what we held to be implicit in the agreement there involved. See also NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees v. Todhunter Bros. Glass
338 F. App'x 605 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 2009
MEMORANDUM * The Board of Trustees of the Glasswork-ers Industry Health & Security Trust Fund, the Puget Sound Northwest Glaziers and Apprenticeship Training Trust, *606 and the Western Glaziers & Glassworkers Retirement … Printing Div. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190, 207 , 111 S.Ct. 2215 , 115 L.Ed.2d 177 (1991). The state court lacked jurisdiction to enter summary judgment in favor of the Trusts on these claims. San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Don Burgess Construction Corp.
596 F.2d 378 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 4, 1979
We are not to overturn the Board’s decision unless it is “arbitrary and capricious.” See Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947); Victoria Station v. … Nonetheless, we leave the Board’s denial intact. The grant or denial of a motion to reopen the record rests in the Board’s discretion. NLRB v. Victor Otians Roofing Co., 445 F.2d 299 (9th Cir. 1971).
Cited 1 timesPublishedLarry Deering v. Harold M. Brown, Attorney General of the State of Alaska
839 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 4, 1988
United States v. … Coleman v.
Cited 20 timesPublished714 F. App'x 663 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 25, 2017
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. … and Proc. § 2682 (4th ed. 2017) (citing Brown v. Weschler, 135 F. Supp. 622 (D.D.C. 1955)).
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedSimunich v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
186 F. App'x 801 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 23, 2006
We review de novo, Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Fisher, 104 F.3d 280, 284 (9th Cir.1997) (dismissals based on res judicata); Bianchi v. … See Olson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. ATC, LLC
309 F. App'x 98 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 16, 2009
These facts are sufficient to sustain the Board’s finding of coercive interrogation. NLRB v. Los Angeles New Hosp., 640 F.2d 1017, 1019-20 (9th Cir. 1981). … NLRB v. Associated Gen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Idaho Potato Processors, Inc.
322 F.2d 573 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 17, 1963
The Board relies upon N. L. R. B. v. Essex Wire Corp., 245 F.2d 589 (9th Cir., 1957), and Republic Aviation Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 324 U.S. 793 , 65 S.Ct. 982 , 89 L.Ed. 557 (1945), to support its finding. … Wah Chang Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 305 F.2d 15 (9 Cir., 1962). A decree will be entered enforcing the Board’s order. . 1. Cease and desist from: .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna