Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

2.77s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. California Inspection Rating Bureau

    591 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 13, 1979

    The Board had jurisdiction over the Bureau for the reasons stated by the Board in its Decisions. The Board has considerable discretion in deciding whether or not to exercise jurisdiction that it has. NLRB v. W. B. … NLRB v. E. C. Atkins & Co., 1947, 331 U.S. 398, 403 , 67 S.Ct. 1265 , 91 L.Ed. 1563 . The Board’s order will be enforced.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Delpit v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    19 F.2d 60 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 18, 1927

    Co. v. United States S. B. E. F. Corp., 267 F. 283 ; Harry Porter Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board *62 E. F. Corp., 284 F. 397 ; Hill v. U. S. Shipping Board E. F. Corp., 284 F. 398 ; James v. … United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp, 12 F.(2d) 89 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service

    689 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 5, 1982

    In NLRB v. J. … We review the Board’s findings under the substantial evidence standard, even where, as here, the Board rejects the ALJ’s findings. Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Teamsters Union Local 287 v. National Labor Relations Board

    293 F. App'x 518 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 18, 2008

    MEMORANDUM *** Teamsters Union Local 287 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“Local 287”) petitions for review of a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) order that affirmed an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ … East Bay Automotive Council v. NLRB, 483 F.3d 628, 632 (9th Cir.2007) (quoting Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    711 F.2d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 1983

    In NLRB v. J. … This Court will uphold the Board’s construction of the National Labor Relations Act if it is reasonable or permissible. Ford Motor Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Rosenberg Bros.

    12 F.2d 721 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 1926

    Smith v. U. S. Shipping Board, etc. (D. C.) 2 F.(2d) 390 . There is strength too, in the reasoning of the court in United States Shipping Board v. … In Sloan Shipyard Corporation v. U. S. Shipping Board, 258 U. S. 549 , 42 S. Ct. 386 , 66 L.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Rosenberg Brothers & Co., 276 U.S. 202 (1928)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Nb v. Hellgate Elementary School Dist. Ex Rel. Board of Directors

    541 F.3d 1202 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 4, 2008

    Dist. v. … DM v. Sch.

    Cited 79 timesPublished
  • Smiley (Richard Emmett) v. State of California, Brown (Jerry), Bird (Rose)

    730 F.2d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 19, 1984

    730 F.2d 769 Smiley (Richard Emmett) v. State of California, Brown (Jerry), Bird (Rose) NO. 81-4412 United States Court of Appeals, ninth Circuit. JAN 19, 1984 1 Appeal From: E.D.Cal. 2 AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United Ass'n of Journeymen

    827 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 8, 1987

    DISCUSSION An NLRB order will be enforced if the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and the Board correctly applied the law. NLRB v. IBEW Local 46, 793 F.2d 1026, 1028 (9th Cir.1986). … The Board’s interpretation of the Act is entitled to deference and this court will uphold it if it is reasonably defensible. Id. See also NLRB v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ronwin v. State Bar

    686 F.2d 692 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 14, 1981

    Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. at 350-352 [ 63 S.Ct. at 313-14 ]; Continental Co. v. Union Carbide, 370 U.S. 690, 706-07 [ 82 S.Ct. 1404, 1414-15 , 8 L.Ed.2d 777 ] (1962). … State Bar of California, 386 F.2d 962 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1011 , 88 S.Ct. 1262 , 20 L.Ed.2d 162 (1968); and Brown v. Board of Bar Examiners, 623 F.2d 605 (9th Cir. 1980).

    Reversed by Hoover v. Ronwin, 466 U.S. 558 (1984)Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Nancy Anne Spangler v. United States of America, Appellant-Intervenor v. Pasadena City Board of Education

    415 F.2d 1242 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 28, 1969

    Finally, the school board has an obligation to operate “a racially nondiscriminatory school system,” Brown v. Board of Education (1955) 349 U.S. 294, 301 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 . … Board of Education, supra; Green v. County School Board, supra; Cooper v. Aaron (1955) 358 U.S. 1, 7 , 78 S.Ct. 1401 , 3 L.Ed.2d 5, 19 ; Goss v.

    Limited by Van Hoomissen v. Xerox Corp., 497 F.2d 180 (1974)Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Eugene F. MAROTTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. USERY, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor, Defendant-Appellee

    629 F.2d 615 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 6, 1980

    The final decision of the Review Board was made on March 4, 1976. … We note that shortly after Day v. Mathews was decided, the Supreme Court used language which seemed to support the result in Day v. Mathews. Franks v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • M.W. Kellogg Constructors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    867 F.2d 498 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 1989

    PER CURIAM: This unfair labor practice case is before us again after we remanded it to the National Labor Relations Board for further findings. Our original decision is reported as M.W. Kellogg Constructors, Inc. v. … The Board has once more found the employer and the union guilty of unfair labor practices. Because the Board has failed to follow our mandate we do not enforce its order.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Frank Cerrato v. San Francisco Community College District

    26 F.3d 968 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 16, 1994

    The jury determined that a voting majority of the Board (Brown, Burton, Wolfred, and Ayala) had acted lawfully in deciding to hire Tom over Cerrato. … of the entire membership of the board. 3.

    Cited 190 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Holtville Ice & Cold Storage Co.

    148 F.2d 168 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 28, 1945

    North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass’n v. National Labor Relations Board, 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 76 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Northwestern Mut. Fire Ass’n, 9 Cir., 142 F.2d 866 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Long Lake Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 138 F.2d 363 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Abex Corporation Aerospace Division

    543 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 7, 1976

    PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) petitions this court to enforce an order issued against Abex Corporation— Aerospace Division (“Company”) arising out of alleged violations of the National Labor … The Board’s order is reported at 215 N.L. R.B. No. 114. We deny the petition.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Wenatchee Thrifty Drugs, Inc.

    378 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 26, 1967

    PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order issued against respondent November 15, 1965, 151 N.L.R.B. 752 ; 155 N.L.R.B. 843 . … We reject this contention under the facts of this case for the reasons assigned in NLRB v. Carroll-Naslund Disposal, Inc., 359 F.2d 779 (9th Cir. 1966).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. San Juan Lumber Company

    367 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 17, 1966

    The Board’s petition for enforcement of its order issued against respondent on September 13, 1964, is granted. … However, we do not pass upon the adequacy of the Board’s alternate ground for decision; that is, that the issuance by the employer of paychecks not covered by sufficient funds permitted the employees to disregard the grievance

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cel-A-Pak v. California Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    680 F.2d 664 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 2, 1982

    Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, Circuit Judge, and BYRNE, * District Judge. … S. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union

    413 F.2d 30 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 1969

    B. v. Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212 (C.B.S. case), 364 U.S. 573, 583 , 81 S.Ct. 330 , 5 L.Ed.2d 302 . … While there are factual distinctions between this case and the jurisdictional dispute involved in N.L.R.B. v. International Longshoremen’s & Warehouse-men’s Union (U. S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.