Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc.

465 F.2d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 3, 1972

A union’s majority *720 status is irrefutably presumed for a year following its certification by the Board. Brooks v. NLRB, 1954, 348 U.S. 96, 103-104 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 ; NLRB v. … They do, however, provide support for the Board’s finding that the employer’s demand for a July 12 termination date was further proof of bad faith bargaining. NLRB v.

Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment Corporation

603 F.2d 1367 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 12, 1979

Stewart v. … Smith-Blair, Inc., 331 F.2d 506, 510 (9th Cir. 1964); *1375 Brown v. Chapman, 304 F.2d 149 , 154 (9th Cir. 1962); and Empire Printing Co. v. Roden, 247 F.2d 8, 16 (9th Cir. 1957). . See, e. g., Moore v.

M & M Wood Working Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

101 F.2d 938 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 1939

Thereupon Local No. 102 filed charges with the Board, and the Board issued its complaint against the Company. Local No. 2531 was permitted to intervene. … After hearings before a trial examiner and before the Board in January, 1938, the Board on April 1, 1938, made the order now under review.

Miller v. Western Board Of Adjusters

427 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 20, 1970

427 F.2d 175 Marvin MILLER and Covina Publishing, Inc., a corporation, dba Collectors Publications, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WESTERN BOARD OF ADJUSTERS, INC., a California corporation, Andres Alonso, Jr., and Edgar L. … Lundeen v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Phaostron Instrument and Electronic Company

344 F.2d 855 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 27, 1965

B. v. … The Board’s conclusion that the eight employees believed that Martel had been unfairly treated is sufficient to protect their concerted activity. It was said in N. L. R. B. v.

Eddie G. Javor v. Edmund G. Brown, Governor of the State of California

295 F.2d 60 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 24, 1961

Williams v. Peters, 9 Cir., 233 F.2d 618 , 16 Alaska 471 . … Gardner v. J. J. Newberry Co., 9 Cir., 239 F.2d 178 .

Providence Alaska Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

121 F.3d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 18, 1997

We agreed with the Board that “[sjueh activity [wa]s more clerical than supervisory.” Id. Several years later, in NLRB v. … Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Electrical Contractor's Ass'n

478 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 21, 1973

The matter is here on application of the Board to enforce its ensuing order. … They were not urged before the Board nor excused because of extraordinary circumstances ( 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e)); N. L. R. B. v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., 368 U.S. 318 , 82 S.Ct. 344 , 7 L.Ed.2d 312 (1961). So ordered.

Quinton Brown v. Fitzpatrick

667 F. App'x 267 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 23, 2016

BROWN, No. 15-35435 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00397-SAB v. … See Chodos v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Stationary Engineers, Local 39

746 F.2d 530 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 1984

The Board filed an application for enforcement of its order on December 20, 1983. II We must determine whether substantial evidence supports the Board’s factual findings. Universal Camera Corp. v. … See also NLRB v.

Jose Escobar Santos v. Merrick Garland

4 F.4th 762 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 9, 2021

Escobar has not referred us to any evidence that California uses a broader 2 Our dissenting colleague cites People v. Brown, 2010 WL 3871856, at *1 (Cal. Ct. … GARLAND issue appeared to be genuine.4 See People v. Brown, 2010 WL 3871856, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) (unpublished).

National Labor Relations Board v. Carl Weissman & Sons, Inc.

849 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 16, 1988

The Board has broad discretion in representation matters, including the scheduling of elections. NLRB v. Sonoma Vineyards, Inc., 727 F.2d 860, 863 (9th Cir.1984); Summa Corp v. NLRB, 625 F.2d 293, 295 (9th Cir.1980). … The conduct of a union official, not a Board agent, created the problem. The Company’s argument that the Board should follow the analogy of such cases as NLRB v.

Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Board of Airport Commissioners

785 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 25, 1986

The Board’s reliance on recent Supreme Court decisions in Perry Education Association v. … In Rosen v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union

210 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 11, 1954

Radio Officers’ Un *584 ion v. N. L. R. B., 74 S.Ct. 323, 342 ; see also, National Licorice Co. v. N. L. R. B., 309 U.S. 350, 363 , 60 S.Ct. 569 , 84 L.Ed. 799 ; N. L. R. B. v. Newspaper & Mail Del. … See Radio Officers’ Union v. N. L. R. B., supra.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Electrical Contractor's Association

478 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 21, 1973

P 13,706 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … They were not urged before the Board nor excused because of extraordinary circumstances ( 29 U.S.C. Sec. 160 (e)); N. L. R. B. v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., 368 U.S. 318 , 82 S.Ct. 344 , 7 L.Ed.2d 312 (1961). 4 So ordered.

American Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Burnet

45 F.2d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 6, 1930

Comm’r, 35 F.(2d) 139, 141 ; House & Herrmann, Inc. v. Lucas, 36 F.(2d) 51 ; Anchor Co., Inc. v. Comm’r, 42 F.(2d) 99 . C. C. A. 5: Avery v. Comm’r, 22 F.(2d) 6 , 55 A. L. R. 1277; Brown v. … .: Henderson Iron Works v. Blair, 58 App. D. C. 114, 25 F.(2d) 538 ; Geo. Feick & Sons Co. v. Blair, 58 App. D. C. 168, 26 F.(2d) 540, 542 ; Brown Lbr. Co. v. Comm’r, 59 App. D. C. 110, 35 F.(2d) 880 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Idaho Electric Company, Inc.

384 F.2d 697 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 10, 1967

We agree and affirm the Board’s decision as reported, supra. … N.L.R.B. v. Security Plating Co., 356 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1966); N.L.R.B. v. Trimfit of Cal *699 ifornia, 211 F.2d 206 (9th Cir. 1954).

United States v. Peter Arthur Fox

454 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 1972

United States v. Thomas, 9 Cir., 1970, 422 F.2d 1327 ; Gregory v. United States, 9 Cir., 1970, 422 F.2d 1323 ; United States v. Browning, 9 Cir., 1970, 423 F.2d 1201 ; United States v. … In all of these cases except four (Gregory, Browning, Broyles and Andre), the delinquency was the same as here — failure to take a physical examination as ordered.

Michael Brown v. Whitten

649 F. App'x 410 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 21, 2016

Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm. … The district court properly dismissed Brown’s due process claim against defendant Whitten because Brown had an adequate postdeprivation remedy under California law. See Hudson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. W. S. Hatch Co., Inc.

474 F.2d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 1, 1973

Congress has entrusted the Board with a wide discretion in conducting and supervising elections. See NLRB v. A. J. Tower Co., 1946, 329 U.S. 324, 330-331 , 67 S.Ct. 324 , 91 L.Ed. 322 . … We therefore join the other Circuits which have approved the procedure employed by the Board in this case. 4 NLRB v. Mar Salle, Inc., supra; NLRB v.