Case law

Walla Walla Union-Bulletin, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

631 F.2d 609 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 29, 1980

The Board is given broad discretion in determining the appropriate unit and, unless clearly arbitrary, the Board’s legal conclusion should be affirmed. NLRB v. … In 1972, the Board announced that employers could force the union, 'as a condition of recognition, to demonstrate majority support through Board representation hearings and election. See Linden Lumber Division v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Lithographers Of America (Ind.)

309 F.2d 31 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 9, 1962

N.L.R.B., 5 Cir., 301 F.2d 20, 24-27 , and Brown v. … In Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sun Tent-Luebbert Co.

154 F.2d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 2, 1946

The Supreme Court in its opinion in National Labor Relations Board v. … “The court found warrant for its excision of this provision in [National] Labor Relations Board v. Express Pub. Co., supra ( 312 U.S. 426, 433 , 61 S.Ct. 693 , 85 L.Ed. 930 ).

National Labor Relations Board v. Progress Bulletin Publishing Co.

443 F.2d 1369 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 20, 1971

PER CURIAM: Judge Ely would enforce the board’s order on the basis of the board’s opinion reported at 182 N.L.R.B. No. 135. … Judge Taylor agrees with the minority board opinion that the issue should have been arbitrated.

National Labor Relations Board v. Western Lace & Line Co.

215 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 17, 1954

The findings of the Board are supported and the petition ordered granted.

National Labor Relations Board v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.

205 F.2d 471 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 25, 1953

thing and that he felt in his (Fowler’s) own mind that the company possibly was trying to fire Newsom in order to break up their attempt at unionization; that they could, therefore, take it to the National Labor Relations Board … Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 . 2 . See Note 1. 3 . N. L. R. B. v. Swinerton, 9 Cir., 1953, 202 F.2d 511 .

Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

407 F.2d 1383 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 1969

As we said in Universal Camera Corp. v. … See NLRB v. United Ins. Co., supra, 390 U.S. at p. 256 , 88 S.Ct. 988 . The Board seems to have relied primarily upon , the nature of the work done.

National Labor Relations Board v. West Coast Casket Company, Inc.

469 F.2d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 17, 1972

However, in Southport Petroleum Co. v. … The Board’s conclusions must be affirmed if, considering the record as a whole, the conclusions are supported by substantial evidence. Universal Camera Corp. v. N.

National Labor Relations Board v. Stockton Door Co., Inc.

547 F.2d 489 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 23, 1976

PER CURIAM: The petitioning Board, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e), has applied for enforcement of its order issued against the Respondent. The Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 218 NLRB No. 156 . … Reviewing the record as a whole, we find substantial evidence supporting the Board’s finding that the Respondent violated section 8(a)(1), (2), (3), and (5) of the Act.

Press Democrat Publishing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

629 F.2d 1320 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 8, 1980

.; and Brown Newspaper Publishing Co. (collectively, the “Employers”), which publish several suburban newspapers in the Bay Area. … The Board has broad discretion in fashioning decrees to remedy violations of the Act, N. L. R. B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lewis

246 F.2d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 1, 1957

246 F.2d 886 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Jack LEWIS and Joe Levitan, a Copartnership Doing Business as California Footwear Company and Trina Shoe Company, a Corporation, Respondents. No. 15169. … And if the record were in better shape, we would think our case of N.L.R.B. v.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

525 F.3d 862 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 8, 2008

Sever v. NLRB, 231 F.3d 1156 , 1164 (9th Cir.2000). … NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Tri-City Linen Supply

579 F.2d 51 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 24, 1978

NLRB v. … elections. 14 See NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Merner Lumber and Hardware Company

345 F.2d 770 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 22, 1965

All of these employees, the Board found, had been active in promoting the organizing attempt of the Union at the Palo Alto store. … The Board’s determination in this regard will not be set aside in the absence of a showing that such determination was arbitrary and capricious. See N. L. R. B. v. Dewey Portland Cement Co., 10 Cir., 336 F.2d 117, 119 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc.

465 F.2d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 3, 1972

A union’s majority *720 status is irrefutably presumed for a year following its certification by the Board. Brooks v. NLRB, 1954, 348 U.S. 96, 103-104 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 ; NLRB v. … They do, however, provide support for the Board’s finding that the employer’s demand for a July 12 termination date was further proof of bad faith bargaining. NLRB v.

M & M Wood Working Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

101 F.2d 938 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 17, 1939

Thereupon Local No. 102 filed charges with the Board, and the Board issued its complaint against the Company. Local No. 2531 was permitted to intervene. … After hearings before a trial examiner and before the Board in January, 1938, the Board on April 1, 1938, made the order now under review.

United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.

455 F.2d 432 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 6, 1971

Co. v. Risty, 276 U.S. 567 , 48 S.Ct. 396 , 72 L.Ed. 703 (1928); First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of Commissioners of Weld County, 264 U.S. 450 , 44 S.Ct. 385 , 68 L.Ed. 784 (1924); Prentis v. … Cross-appeal of Hugh Brown in Appeal No. 25241 On August 26, 1971, the cross-appeal of Hugh Brown was dismissed by a motion panel of this court for lack of prosecution.

National Labor Relations Board v. Great Western Produce, Inc.

839 F.2d 555 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 9, 1988

II The Board’s determination that a particular bargaining unit is appropriate will not be overturned unless the Board has abused its discretion. Spring City Knitting Co. v. … However, unit determination is a matter committed to the Board’s discretion. N.L.R.B. v. Carson Cable TV, 795 F.2d 879, 884 (9th Cir.1986).

Miller v. Western Board Of Adjusters

427 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 20, 1970

427 F.2d 175 Marvin MILLER and Covina Publishing, Inc., a corporation, dba Collectors Publications, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WESTERN BOARD OF ADJUSTERS, INC., a California corporation, Andres Alonso, Jr., and Edgar L. … Lundeen v.

Inter-Polymer Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

480 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 15, 1973

Citing NLRB v. Copps Corp., 458 F.2d 1227 (7th Cir. 1972), and NLRB v. … E. g., Brooks v. NLRB, 348 U.S. 96, 103-104 , 75 S.Ct. 176 , 99 L.Ed. 125 (1954); NLRB v. Keystone Valve Corp., 449 F.2d 1253, 1256-1259 (5th Cir. 1971); NLRB v. Holly-General Co., 305 F.2d 670, 675 (9th Cir. 1962).