Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. W. R. Ames Company

450 F.2d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 16, 1971

Gallenkamp Stores v. N.L.R.B., 402 F.2d 525 (9th Cir. 1968). … N.L.R.B. v. Bata Shoe Company, 377 F.2d 821, 825 (4th Cir. 1967.) See also N.L.R.B. v. Harrah’s Club, 403 F.2d 865 (9th Cir. 1968.)

National Labor Relations Board v. Carda Hotels, Inc.

604 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 24, 1979

See N.L.R.B. v. Tahoe Nugget, Inc., 584 F.2d 293 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, —U.S.—, 99 S.Ct. 2847 , 61 L.Ed.2d 290 (1979); Sahara-Tahoe Corp. v. … The Board’s Order will be ENFORCED. . 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 (a)(1) and 158(a)(5).

Redmond-Issaquah Railroad Preservation Ass'n v. Surface Transportation Board

223 F.3d 1057 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 2000

Chase v. … See United States v.

George C. Foss Company v. National Labor Relations Board

752 F.2d 1407 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 31, 1985

In NLRB v. … NLRB v. Nevis Industries, Inc., 647 F.2d 905 , 908 (9th Cir.1981). The Board’s interpretation of the Act is entitled to deference, and will be upheld if reasonably defensible. Ford Motor Co. v.

Earl H. Akins v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

721 F.2d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 5, 1983

Railroad Retirement Board, 294 F.2d 115, 116 (9th Cir.1961) (per curiam). The Board relied on United States v. Gritta, 1 R.R. Retirement Rep. (CCH) ¶ 4562 (S.D.Tex.1968). … See also Culley v. Railroad Retirement Board, 308 F.2d 573 (2d Cir.1962) (per curiam) (same); United States v. Regan, 1 R.R. Retirement Rep. (CCH) ¶ 4312 (E.D.N.Y.1960) (policeman’s pension).

Biggs v. Secretary of the California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

717 F.3d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 29, 2013

In Brown v. … . & REHAB. 29 such a holding here given the different context, as discussed above in regard to Himes and Brown. In Moor v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC

708 F. App'x 425 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 28, 2017

Nurses, 871 F.3d at 777 (quoting Universal Camera Corp. v. … ‘We must enforce the Board’s order if the Board correctly applied the law and if the Board’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence on the record viewed as a whole.” NLRB v.

California State Legislative Board v. Department of Transportation

400 F.3d 760 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 8, 2005

Union v. Mineta, 328 F.3d 605, 606 (9th Cir. 2003).  CAL. STATE LEGISLATIVE BOARD v. … STATE LEGISLATIVE BOARD v.

Humes Electric, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

715 F.2d 468 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 7, 1983

The Supreme Court has recently held that the Board can properly place the burden of proving this affirmative defense on the employer. N.L.R.B. v. … The Board’s order shall be ENFORCED.

National Labor Relations Board v. Vapor Recovery Systems Company

311 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 31, 1962

He was succeeded to the Presidency by his son, Ray V. Long on July 7, 1960. This fact was announced to all of Respondent’s personnel by a notice posted on the company bulletin board. … In Fritz v. Pennsylvania Fire Ins.

Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union John Wilhelm Donald M. Taylor Mark D. Atkinson v. Nevada Gaming Commission

984 F.2d 1507 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 27, 1993

V. … They acknowledge that the Supreme Court in its opinion in Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Detective Intelligence Service, Inc.

448 F.2d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 24, 1971

NLRB v. J. J. Collins’ Sons, Inc., 332 F.2d 523, 525 (7th Cir.1964); NLRB v. Joclin Manufacturing Co., 314 F.2d 627, 633-634 (2d Cir.1963). … Tidewater Oil Co. v. NLRB, 358 F.2d 363, 366 (2d Cir.1966); NLRB v. Joclin Manufacturing Co., 314 F.2d 627, 634-635 (2d Cir.1963).

William Hawkins, III v. the Franchise Tax Board of Cal

769 F.3d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 2014

The California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) assessed $15.3 million in additional taxes, penalties, and interest for the same tax years. Hawkins made an offer in compromise to the IRS of $8 million, which was rejected. … See, e.g., Vaughn v.

Hawaii Meat Company, Limited v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 5, 1963

Brown-Dunkin Co., 10 Cir., 1961, 287 F.2d 17 ; Jays Foods, Inc. v. NLRB, 7 Cir., 1961, 292 F.2d 317 ; NLRB v. Rapid Bindery, Inc., 2 Cir., 1961, 293 F.2d 170 ; NLRB v. Lassing, 6 Cir., 1960, 284 F.2d 781 ; NLRB v. … NLRB v. Brown-Dunkin Co., supra; see NLRB v. Rapid Bindery, Inc., supra.

Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

452 F.2d 8 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 24, 1971

The Board has advanced the contention that once an employer assigns a union as its exclusive hiring agent, it is jointly liable for any discriminatory acts which occur, and cites Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. … The Board’s findings are shown to be supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

California Teachers Ass'n v. State Board of Education

263 F.3d 888 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 29, 2001

Id. 1 Plaintiffs brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State Board of Education, et al. … Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Bakersfield Californian

128 F.3d 1339 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 19, 1997

See EEOC v. Children’s Hosp. Med. … See Casey v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Los Angeles New Hospital

640 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 1981

See NLRB v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium, 436 F.2d 45, 49 (9th Cir. 1970), citing NLRB v. Varo, Inc., 425 F.2d 293, 298 (5th Cir. 1970). … Compare Hendricks County, supra and NLRB v. Wheeling Electric Co., 444 F.2d 783 (4th Cir. 1971) with NLRB v. Southern Greyhound Lines, supra. 4 .

Broer v. Indeterminate Sentence Review Board

201 F. App'x 479 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 2006

Broer’s § 2254 petition seeks to challenge the constitutionality of Washington state statutes regarding the re-enfranchisement of convicted felons, and specifically, the Indeterminate Sentence Review *480 Board’s refusal … See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ; Preiser v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mrak Coal Company, Inc.

322 F.2d 311 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 9, 1963

National Labor Relations Board v. … Assuming, as we will here, that such testimony is always admissible under the theory expressed in National Labor Relations Board v.