Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

3.27s

  • Safari Club International v. Debra Haaland

    31 F.4th 1157 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 18, 2022

    The Alaska Board of Game (Board) expanded the availability of brown bear hunting permits, extended the brown bear hunting season, increased relevant harvest limits, and approved the taking of brown bears through baiting at … Still, the Board did not change its course, and so FWS blocked the Board’s authorization of brown bear baiting at black bear stations in the Kenai Refuge in 2013 and 2014. 81 Fed. Reg. 27036.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mt. Vernon Tanker Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    549 F.2d 571 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 4, 1977

    The Board reached its decision by applying NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 , 95 S.Ct. 959 , 43 L.Ed.2d 171 (1975) to the facts of this case. We find Weingarten to be inapposite. … Int’l Ladies’ Garment Workers Union v. Quality Mfg. Co., 416 U.S. 968 , 94 S.Ct. 1990 , 40 L.Ed.2d 557 (1974). 4 . N.L.R.B. v. J.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. The Englander Company

    260 F.2d 67 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 26, 1959

    260 F.2d 67 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … B. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 23, 2026

    Plaintiff - Appellee, 9:24-cr-00049-DLC-1 v. MEMORANDUM* MALLORY NEHEMIAH BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. … At most, the evidence shows mitigating circumstances, and Brown was able to so argue at sentencing. 2. Brown acknowledges that United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Shadeed v. Board of Prison Terms

    261 F. App'x 72 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 21, 2007

    See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Joseph Magnin Company

    704 F.2d 1457 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 3, 1983

    This circuit has stated that “[t]he Board has wide discretion to apply its Spielberg criteria,” NLRB v. … Co. v. NLRB, 172 F.2d 62, 63 (4th Cir.1949) (emphasis added). See also NLRB v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. U.S. Divers Company

    308 F.2d 899 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 8, 1962

    As stated by this court, in National Labor Relations Board v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cieklinski v. National Labor Relations Board

    224 F. App'x 727 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

    MEMORANDUM *** Michael Cieklinski and Allan Nairn petition pro se for review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) limiting an award of damages to identified traveling workers whose federal statutory … See 29 C.F.R. § 102.53 ; Nat’l Labor Relations Bd. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. L. D. McFarland Company

    572 F.2d 256 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 4, 1978

    We note at the outset that “Congress has entrusted the Board with a wide discretion in conducting and supervising elections.” N.L.R.B. v. W. S. Hatch Co., 474 F.2d 558, 561 (9th Cir. 1973); N.L.R.B. v. … Therefore, the Board, even had it considered the merits of the objection, would have been obliged to reject it. See Sonoco Products Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.

    118 F.2d 980 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 9, 1941

    Mfrs. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 106 F.2d 100, 113 . With respect to the conduct of the Trial Examiner during the course of the hearing, the case of Inland Steel Co. v. … [Cases cited and quoted.] * * * “The rule is again clearly stated in Morgan v. United States, 304 U.S. 1, 14 , 58 S.Ct. 773, 999 , 82 L.Ed. 1129 .” See also National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Plaza Auto Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    664 F.3d 286 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 19, 2011

    Operations, Inc. v. … In addition, the Board should give full effect to the PLAZA AUTO CENTER v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. W. R. Ames Company

    450 F.2d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 16, 1971

    Gallenkamp Stores v. N.L.R.B., 402 F.2d 525 (9th Cir. 1968). … N.L.R.B. v. Bata Shoe Company, 377 F.2d 821, 825 (4th Cir. 1967.) See also N.L.R.B. v. Harrah’s Club, 403 F.2d 865 (9th Cir. 1968.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chamber of Commerce v. National Labor Relations Board

    574 F.2d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 8, 1978

    National Labor Relations Board, 201 NLRB 59 (1973), enfd. sub nom., George Koch Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 490 F.2d 323 (4th Cir. 1974). … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 465 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Earl H. Akins v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

    721 F.2d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 5, 1983

    Railroad Retirement Board, 294 F.2d 115, 116 (9th Cir.1961) (per curiam). The Board relied on United States v. Gritta, 1 R.R. Retirement Rep. (CCH) ¶ 4562 (S.D.Tex.1968). … See also Culley v. Railroad Retirement Board, 308 F.2d 573 (2d Cir.1962) (per curiam) (same); United States v. Regan, 1 R.R. Retirement Rep. (CCH) ¶ 4312 (E.D.N.Y.1960) (policeman’s pension).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Redmond-Issaquah Railroad Preservation Ass'n v. Surface Transportation Board

    223 F.3d 1057 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 14, 2000

    Chase v. … See United States v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • George C. Foss Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    752 F.2d 1407 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 31, 1985

    In NLRB v. … NLRB v. Nevis Industries, Inc., 647 F.2d 905 , 908 (9th Cir.1981). The Board’s interpretation of the Act is entitled to deference, and will be upheld if reasonably defensible. Ford Motor Co. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Carda Hotels, Inc.

    604 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 24, 1979

    See N.L.R.B. v. Tahoe Nugget, Inc., 584 F.2d 293 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, —U.S.—, 99 S.Ct. 2847 , 61 L.Ed.2d 290 (1979); Sahara-Tahoe Corp. v. … The Board’s Order will be ENFORCED. . 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 (a)(1) and 158(a)(5).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McDermott v. Ampersand Publishing, LLC

    593 F.3d 950 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 26, 2010

    See NLRB v. … Johnson v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • James E. Brown & Associates, Inc. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp

    679 F.2d 899 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 30, 1982

    Brown & Associates, Inc. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp. 81-4234 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 4/30/82 1 N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc.

    659 F.2d 995 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 25, 1981

    Amax Coal Co. v. NLRB, supra, 614 F.2d at 889. The Board did not reach this issue because it concluded that respondent’s duty to notify could not be affected by any union notification. … NLRB v. Top Manufacturing Co., 594 F.2d 223 , 224 (9th Cir. 1979).

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.