Case law

Gonzales v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 2009

Brown, John Marshall and State of California.  GONZALEZ v. … The  GONZALEZ v. BROWN 14657 fact that African-American jurors remained on the panel “may be considered indicative of a nondiscriminatory motive.” Tur- ner v.

Brown v. United States

12 F.2d 926 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 24, 1926

Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U. S. 465 , 41 S. Ct. 574 , 65 L. Ed. 1048 , 13 A. L. R. 1159; Malacrauis v. United States (C. C. A.) 299 F. 253 ; Thomas v. United States (C. C. A.) 290 F. 133 ; Ludwig v. United States (C. C.

Brown v. Ayers

72 F. App'x 578 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 2003

I agree that the district court’s denial of Brown’s habeas petition should be reversed and this case remanded for further *582 proceedings. … As noted by the majority, decisions rendered by this court after the district court had denied Brown’s petition have altered the tolling calculation and may provide a basis for Brown to avoid the limitations bar.

Cooper v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 11, 2009

COOPER v. BROWN 5527 In Beck v. … BROWN query. See also Cooper v.

Lumpkin v. Brown

109 F.3d 1498 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 3, 1997

See Waters v. … v.

Brown v. United States

56 F.2d 997 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 14, 1932

Appellant Joseph Brown was found guilty on count 1 of the indictment charging, conspiracy; appellant Rudolph Bouthellier was found guilty on count 1 and count 3, the latter charging manufacture of liquor; and appellant Francis … See, also, Benson v. United States, 146 U. S. 325, 336 , 13 S. Ct. 60 , 36 L. Ed. 991 ; Wong Din v. United States (C. C. A. 9) 135 F. 702, 706 ; Grunberg v. United States (C. C. A. 1) 145 F. 81, 86 ; Radin et al. v.

Edwards v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 8, 2008

The claimed instructional error is not materially distin- guishable from the one we rejected in Morales v. Woodford, 388 F.3d 1159, 1173-78 (9th Cir. 2004), certiorari denied, Morales v. Brown, 546 U.S. 935 (2005). … AYERS problems, may be less culpable than defendants who have no such excuse’ ”), quoting California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 545 (1987) (O’Connor, J., concurring); see also Correll v.

Fields v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 2006

JILL BROWN,* Warden, of  D.C. No. … **Judge Ikuta is recused. 11967 11968 FIELDS v. BROWN by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Brown v. United States

329 F.3d 664 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 1, 2003

See Brown v. United States, 2001 WL 1480293 , 88 A.F.T.R.2d.2001-6665, *1 (C.D.Cal.2001). … In Magneson v.

Visciotti v. Brown

406 F.3d 1131 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 9, 2005

406 F.3d 1131 John Louis VISCIOTTI, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Jill BROWN, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin, * Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. No. 99-99031. No. 99-99032. … Notes: * Jill Brown is substituted for Jeanne Woodford, her predecessor as Warden of San Quentin State Prison See Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

Belmontes v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 12, 2008

Belmontes v. Woodford, 350 F.3d 861 (9th Cir. 2003) (“Belmontes I”). In 2005, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (2005). Brown v. … Belmontes v. Brown, 414 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2005) (“Belmontes II”).

Brown v. Lithel

145 F. App'x 198 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 2005

Brown’s claims against defendant Pease fail because verbal harassment generally does not violate the Eighth Amendment. See Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1092 (9th Cir.1996). … Brown failed to present any evidence that he was unable to file a habeas petition, civil rights action, or a direct criminal appeal. See Cornett v.

Brown v. Lambert

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 2008

BROWN v. … BROWN v.

United States v. Brown

720 F.2d 1059 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 18, 1983

And appellants failed to show that the withheld files on Alberta Brown were material. Fed.R.Crim. Proc. 16(a)(1)(C). 16. Specific Claims of Error by Brown The hearsay objections were without merit. … Admissibility of Brown’s photograph and of the motel registration could reasonably be held more probative than prejudicial. United States v. Brannon, 616 F.2d 413, 418 (9th Cir.1980). 17.

Brown v. Farwell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 2008

BROWN v. … BROWN v.

Dye v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 16, 2008

DYE, Former Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellant, v. No. 06-56621 J. GREGORY BROWN; CECILIA A. BAP No. … See In re BH & P, Inc., 949 F.2d 1300, 1307 (3d Cir. 1991) (concluding that the district court’s order removing the trustee due to a conflict of interest is “final”); Turshen v.

Fields v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 10, 2007

FIELDS v. BROWN 11963 In Tinsley v. … Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (2005).

Cooper v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 2007

COOPER v. BROWN 15673 particular scientific tests are reliable enough to permit expert testimony based upon their results.” United States v. … By way of background, Cooper’s forensic  COOPER v. BROWN 15681 expert (Dr.

Visciotti v. Brown

406 F.3d 1131 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 9, 2005

case, we deny Petitioner’s Motion for Oral Argument on Post Remand Briefing and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Woodford v.

Jackson v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 23, 2008

BROWN 901 People v. Jackson, 28 Cal. 3d 264 (1980). … Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 983 (9th Cir. 2005) 914 JACKSON v. BROWN (en banc) (quoting Lambrix v.