Opinion

Visciotti v. Brown

  • 406 F.3d 1131
  • 2005 WL 1076555
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
May 9, 2005
Status
Published
On the bench
Berzon, Pregerson, Tashima
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 44.3%

The opinion

ORDER

Given the facts, the circumstances, and the record in this case, we deny Petitioner’s Motion for Oral Argument on Post Remand Briefing and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19 , 123 S.Ct. 357 , 154 L.Ed.2d 279 (2002). We express no opinion on any of the arguments offered by the parties in their post-remand briefing, as the proper course would be for the district court to review and rule on the arguments in the first instance.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.