Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

3.94s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Electro Vector, Inc.

    539 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 1976

    See National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc., 388 U.S. 26, 32-34 , 87 S.Ct. 1792 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1967); Portland Willamette Company v. … In N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Edmunds v. Board of Examiners in Optometry

    106 F.2d 904 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 26, 1939

    Wilbur v. United States, 281 U.S. 206, 218 , 50 S.Ct. 320, 324 , 74 L.Ed. 809 . See also United States ex rel. Girard Co. v. Helvering, 301 U.S. 540, 543 , 57 S.Ct. 855 , 81 L.Ed. 1272 ; Miguel v. … If his renewal certificate was revoked, then mandamus would not lie to compel action by the Board which is prohibited by the statute. Supervisors of Carroll County v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

    509 F.3d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 3, 2007

    The ordinance has remained in effect continuously since 1979, but the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (“the Board”) has amended its provisions on three occasions, twice prior to 2002 and once in 2002. … See Crown Point, 506 F.3d at 856 (citing Miller v.

    Cited 91 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Scientific Nutrition Corp.

    180 F.2d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1950

    B. v. C. W. Hume Co., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 445 , and N. L. R. B. v. Flotill Products, Inc., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 441 . … B. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Plumas County Board of Supervisors v. Califano

    594 F.2d 756 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 3, 1979

    When Plumas County’s Board of Supervisors was informed of the order the Board instructed the county welfare director not to make the payments and resolved “that Plumas County not comply with the court order, as this would … In Wisdom v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Posada v. U. S. Board of Paroles

    661 F.2d 941 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 11, 1981

    661 F.2d 941 Posada v. U. S. Board of Paroles 79-2586 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 9/11/81 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Servair, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    624 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 22, 1980

    Upon the petition for rehearing of the National Labor Relations Board filed herein on November 30, 1979, the opinion entered herein on October 23, 1979, is withdrawn and the cause is remanded to the National Labor Relations … Board for further consideration under the standards set forth in Spielberg Manufacturing Co., 112 N.L.R.B. 1080 , 36 L.R.R.M. 1152 (1955).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Belgarde v. United States Board of Parole

    547 F.2d 1174 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 20, 1976

    547 F.2d 1174 Belgarde v. United States Board of Parole No. 76-1936 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 12/20/76 1 W.D.Wash. VACATED AND REMANDED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dorman v. U. S. Board of Parole

    538 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 28, 1976

    538 F.2d 335 Dorman v. U. S. Board of Parole No. 75-2002 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 1/28/76 1 C.D.Cal. REMANDED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Elco Corporation

    378 F.2d 62 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 1967

    PER CURIAM: Had this court been called upon to pass originally on the merits of this case, we might have disagreed with the ultimate conclusion of the Board, but that is not the test for reversal. … There exists in the record, in our opinion, sufficient evidence sufficiently substantial to sustain the Board’s conclusion. The order will be enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Hod Carriers' Building & General Laborers' Union of America, Local No. 652, Afl-Cio

    351 F.2d 151 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 27, 1965

    The Board found, upon charges filed by one Waverly Arnold Brown, an individual, that respondent violated Section 8(b) (1) (A) and (2) of the Act by refusing to refer Brown for employment by Earl C. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 [ 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 ].”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. State Board of Equalization

    639 F.2d 458 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 23, 1980

    Western Lithographic Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 11 Cal.2d 156 , 78 P.2d 731, 737 (1938). … Diamond National Corp. v. State Board of Equalization, 425 U.S. 268 , 96 S.Ct. 1530 , 47 L.Ed.2d 780 (1976).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re: Marion Dale Jackson Patricia L. Jackson, Debtors. California Franchise Tax Board v. Marion Dale Jackson Patricia L. Jackson

    184 F.3d 1046 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 1999

    Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 55 , 116 S.Ct. 1114 , 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996); Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 238 , 105 S.Ct. 3142 , 87 L.Ed.2d 171 (1985); BV Engineering v. … We decline to address the issue of whether § 106(b) is constitutional because the Board’s conduct falls squarely under the Supreme Court’s decision in Gardner v. New Jersey. See Crowder v.

    Cited 81 timesPublished
  • Neuro Affiliates v. National Labor Relations Board

    722 F.2d 746 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 4, 1983

    (BNA) 2904 Neuro Affiliates v. National Labor Relations Board NOS. 82-7507, 82-7631 United States Court of Appeals, ninth Circuit. NOV 04, 1983 1 Appeal From: N.L.R.B. 2 ORDER ENFORCED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Inland Motors

    439 F.2d 82 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 25, 1971

    Those upon which the Board based its order are not unreasonable; hence, we cannot overturn the factual conclusions upon which the Board’s order was based. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. … See also Santa Fe Drilling Company v. N. L. R. B., 416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969). 1 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Orito v. U. S. Board of Parole

    605 F.2d 562 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 13, 1979

    605 F.2d 562 Orito v. U. S. Board of Parole No. 78-2688 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 9/13/79 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stroud v. L.A. County Board of Supervisors

    554 F.2d 1070 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 26, 1977

    554 F.2d 1070 Stroud v. L.A. County Board of Supervisors No. 75-3414 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 5/26/77 1 C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Servette, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    313 F.2d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 1963

    The Board’s reliance upon Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. N. L. R. B., E10 F.2d 591 (9th Cir.) is misplaced. … The motion of the Board is denied. See Partenweederei, MS Belgrano, and Rudolph A. Oetker v. George Weigel (9th Cir.), 313 F.2d 423 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reynoso v. U. S. Railroad Retirement Board

    652 F.2d 65 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 12, 1981

    652 F.2d 65 Reynoso v. U. S. Railroad Retirement Board 80-7313 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 6/12/81 1 R. R. Retirement Bd. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Deutsch Co.

    408 F.2d 684 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 1969

    We find the alleged violations of the Labor-Management Act so trivial that we conclude the purposes of the Act would not be served by enforcement of the Board’s proposed order. Accordingly, enforcement is denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.