Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Elco Corporation

  • 378 F.2d 62
  • 65 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2384
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6501
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
May 5, 1967
Status
Published
On the bench
Barnes, Browning, Per Curiam, Smith
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

Had this court been called upon to pass originally on the merits of this case, we might have disagreed with the ultimate conclusion of the Board, but that is not the test for reversal. There exists in the record, in our opinion, sufficient evidence sufficiently substantial to sustain the Board’s conclusion.

The order will be enforced.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.