Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca9

10,000+ results

0.81s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Elco Corporation

    378 F.2d 62 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 5, 1967

    PER CURIAM: Had this court been called upon to pass originally on the merits of this case, we might have disagreed with the ultimate conclusion of the Board, but that is not the test for reversal. … There exists in the record, in our opinion, sufficient evidence sufficiently substantial to sustain the Board’s conclusion. The order will be enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Min. Co.

    133 F.2d 422 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 5, 1943

    attorneys for the National Labor Relations Board. … after the intended use had been made known to the Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Alliance Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. Brown

    36 F.2d 625 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 17, 1929

    Co. v. King Lumber Co., 250 U. S. 2, 13 , 39 S. Ct. 431 , 63 L. Ed. 810 ; Mackintosh v. Agricultural Fire Ins. Co., 150 Cal. 440 , 89 P. 102 , 119 Am. St. Rep. 234 ; 26 C. J. p. 303; 14 R. C. … See Esch v. Home Ins. Co., 78 Iowa, 334 , 43 N. W. 229 , 16 Am. St. Rep. 443 , and 26 Corp. Juris 200, § 243.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • H & D, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    665 F.2d 257 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 11, 1980

    See NLRB v. Associated Shower Door Co., Inc., 512 F.2d 230, 232 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 893 , 96 S.Ct. 191 , 46 L.Ed.2d 125 (1975); NLRB v. … Recently, this court declared in Authorized Air Conditioning Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Geller v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 455 U.S. 901 (1982)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wah Chang Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    305 F.2d 15 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 25, 1962

    See Republic Aviation Corp. v. [National] Labor [Relations] Board, 324 U.S. 793 , [ 65 S.Ct. 982 , 89 L.Ed. 1372 ] ; [National] Labor [Relations] Board *18 v. … Per curiam decision, N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Valley Bakery, Inc.

    986 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1993

    If the Board abused its discretion in failing to hold a hearing, the employer’s refusal to bargain with the Union is not an unfair labor practice. See NLRB v. … Moreover, in NLRB v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bond v. Franchise Tax Board

    175 F. App'x 822 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 29, 2006

    Bond appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action challenging the California Franchise Tax Board’s assessment of tax liabilities for tax years 2000-2003. … We review de novo dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Montes v. United States, 37 F.3d 1347, 1351 (9th Cir.1994), as well as dismissals for failure to state a claim, Kimes v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pacific Southwest Airlines v. National Labor Relations Board

    611 F.2d 1309 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 1980

    The Supreme Court, in dictum, has stated that “the Board’s General Counsel has unreviewable discretion to refuse to institute an unfair labor practice complaint.” Vaca v. … 29 U.S.C. § 153 (d); Vaca v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Pioneer Inn Associates v. National Labor Relations Board

    578 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 1978

    Co. v. NLRB, 536 F.2d 1192, 1194 (7th Cir. 1976); Ingress-Plastene, Inc. v. NLRB, 430 F.2d 542, 547 (7th Cir. 1970). The Board has admitted as much in Sierra Development Co. d/b/a Club Cal-Neva, 231 NLRB No. 5 (1977). … We are bound to enforce the Board's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence viewing the record in its entirety. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

    605 F.2d 493 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 20, 1979

    of Education v. … The principal holding in both cases was that the school boards had operated a dual system as of 1954, the date of Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • William Lyle WORATZECK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA BOARD of EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

    117 F.3d 400 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 24, 1997

    In Olim v. … Neither Brown nor Callahan appeared at the hearing. Woratzeck fully exposed their challenged participation to the Board.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Local Joint Executive Board of Hotel

    301 F.2d 149 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 5, 1962

    301 F.2d 149 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Karon L. Comeaux Sherrika Marzette Comeaux v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company

    915 F.2d 1264 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 1990

    SNEED, Circuit Judge: Karon Comeaux (Comeaux) filed suit against Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation (B & W), alleging that B & W had reneged upon its promise of employment to Comeaux. … Wallis v.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

    509 F.3d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 3, 2007

    The ordinance has remained in effect continuously since 1979, but the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (“the Board”) has amended its provisions on three occasions, twice prior to 2002 and once in 2002. … See Crown Point, 506 F.3d at 856 (citing Miller v.

    Cited 91 timesPublished
  • Contractors' State License Board of California v. Dunbar

    245 F.3d 1058 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 4, 2001

    Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles (In re Gruntz), 202 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). II. We review de novo a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. United States Internal Revenue Serv. v. … Mitchell v. Franchise Tax Bd. (In re Mitchell), 209 F.3d 1111, 1115 (9th Cir.2000).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Long Lake Lumber Co.

    138 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 18, 1943

    The Board attributed this abrupt change in attitude to instructions given Robinson by' the Browns. … We think the record warranted the Board’s treatment of Robinson and the Long Lake Company as joint employers. Cf. N.L.R.B. v. Grower-Shipper Vegetable Ass’n, 9 Cir., 122 F.2d 368, 377 ; N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Scientific Nutrition Corp.

    180 F.2d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1950

    B. v. C. W. Hume Co., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 445 , and N. L. R. B. v. Flotill Products, Inc., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 441 . … B. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Hod Carriers' Building & General Laborers' Union of America, Local No. 652, Afl-Cio

    351 F.2d 151 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 27, 1965

    The Board found, upon charges filed by one Waverly Arnold Brown, an individual, that respondent violated Section 8(b) (1) (A) and (2) of the Act by refusing to refer Brown for employment by Earl C. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 [ 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 ].”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • NLRB v. Radnet Management, Inc.

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 2020

    See NLRB v. … Victoria Station, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Villa Avila

    673 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 29, 1982

    B. v. … Bank v. N. L. R. B., 651 F.2d 1272, 1275 (9th Cir. 1980). The primary responsibility for making that accommodation rests with the Board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.