Case law

Alfonso Calderon v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

780 F.2d 812 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 15, 1986

STANDARD OF REVIEW This court will not set aside a decision of the Board “if it is supported by substantial evidence, is not arbitrary and has a reasonable basis in law.” Akins v. … Railroad Retirement Board, 721 F.2d 652, 653 (9th Cir.1983); Lowe v. Railroad Retirement Board, 294 F.2d 115,116 (9th Cir.1961) (per curiam).

National Labor Relations Board v. Citizen-News Co.

134 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 2, 1943

The National Labor Relations Board, hereinafter referred to as the Board, has petitioned this court to enforce its order made in a proceeding instituted by the issuing of a complaint by the Board on June 27, 1938. … The Board found against the first and second charges thus summarized, which necessarily disposed of the third charge, thus leaving no basis for affirmative action by the Board.

Harold L. Wakefield v. National Labor Relations Board

779 F.2d 1437 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 7, 1986

DISCUSSION We must affirm if the Board has applied the correct legal standards and there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support its findings and conclusions. Local Union No. 76 v. … NLRB v. Mercy Peninsula Ambulance Service, 589 F.2d 1014, 1018 (9th Cir.1979) quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216-17 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).

United States v. David Lee Grandstaff, Douglas Wayne Brown

807 F.2d 851 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 8, 1987

See United States v. … See United States v.

Square D Company v. National Labor Relations Board

332 F.2d 360 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 4, 1964

The Board itself has spoken most persuasively upon this precise point. In Sinclair Refining Company v. N. L. R. … See N.L.R.B. v. F. W. Woodworth Co. (1956) 352 U.S. 938 , 77 S.Ct. 261 , 1 L. Ed.2d 235 (per curiam), reversing 235 F. 2d 319 (9 Cir. 1956); J. I. Case Co. v. N.L.R.B. (7 Cir. 1959) 254 F.2d 149 ; N.L.R.B. v.

amazon.com Services, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 29, 2025

Cowen, Acting General Counsel; National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.; for Defendants-Appellees.  AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC V. … The Board Given the nature of Amazon’s claims in this lawsuit, we begin with the challenged administrative structure. The Board is charged with administering the NLRA. NLRB v.

Keenan v. Director for Benefits Review Board

392 F.3d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 21, 2004

Company v. … This also seems to be the general practice of the Board. See Grimes v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Southwest Airlines

550 F.2d 1148 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 8, 1977

Co. v. Labor Board, 321 U.S. 702, 704-05 , 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 (1944). … Co. v. Labor Board, 321 U.S. 702, 704-05 , 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 (1944).

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board Of Education

549 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 24, 1977

Spangler, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. PASADENA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 74-2116. … ORDER ON REMAND Before CHAMBERS, ELY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. 1 The court concludes that all determinations as to modifications required under Pasadena City Board of Education v.

Fraser & Johnston Company v. National Labor Relations Board

469 F.2d 1259 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 29, 1972

The Board’s remedy should restore “the situation, as nearly as possible, to that which would have obtained but for” the unfair labor practices. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. … B. v. Lewis, 246 F.2d 886 (9th Cir. 1957); International Paper Company, 150 NLRB 1252 (1965); Martin-Burns Sportables, Inc., 129 NLRB 364 (1969); Cf. N. L. R. B. v.

Dawud Halisi MALIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Neal BROWN, Defendant-Appellee

65 F.3d 148 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 8, 1995

Zipfel v. Halliburton Co., 861 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir.1988). … Malik v. Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 333-34 (9th Cir.1994). If we applied RFRA, Malik would still have been the prevailing party. This order memorializes our adoption of RFRA as the proper standard governing this case.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mrs. Fay's Pies

341 F.2d 489 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 3, 1965

supports the Board’s findings. … (c) of the Board’s Order is a broad and ambiguous mandate and, under the authority of Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. N. L. R.

Linn Gear Company v. National Labor Relations Board

608 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 21, 1979

Div. of Alson Indus., OMC. v. NLRB, 523 F.2d 470, 472 (CA9 1975); NLRB v. Smith Industries, 403 F.2d 889, 893 (CA5 1968); NLRB v. KVP Sutherland Paper Co., 356 F.2d 671 (CA6 1966); accord, Smith v. … by this [Act]’ ” NLRB v.

Louie J. Capovilla v. Railroad Retirement Board

924 F.2d 885 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 24, 1991

If the Act is silent or ambiguous on a specific issue, we must then determine whether the Board’s regulation is based on a permissible construction of the Act. 3 See Chevron U.S.A. v. … United States v.

Olsen v. Idaho State Board Of Medicine

363 F.3d 916 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 7, 2004

OLSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IDAHO STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE; Idaho State Board of Medicine Board of Professional Discipline; Michael E. … Miller v.

State Board Of Equalization v. John P. Stodd

500 F.2d 1208 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 29, 1974

500 F.2d 1208 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION and the Department of Human Resources Development, Petitioners and Appellants, v. John P. STODD, Respondent and Appellee. In the Matter of P.R.O. … Simonson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brotherhood of Teamsters

470 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 1972

See NLRB v. Jeffries Banknote Co., 281 F.2d 893 (CA 9, 1960); NLRB v. Hart, 453 F.2d 215 (CA 9, 1971). We have reviewed the record and find substantial support therein to support the Board’s factual determinations. … The Petition of Enforcement is therefore granted and the Board’s Order will be enforced. . 1972 COH NLRB f 23,733. The Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 194 NLRB No. 106 .

Natter Manufacturing Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

580 F.2d 948 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 15, 1978

NLRB v. L. D. McFarland Co., 572 F.2d 256, 261 (9th Cir. 1978), quoting Alson Mfg. Aero. Div. of Alson Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 523 F.2d 470, 472 (9th Cir. 1975); accord, NLRB v. Sauk Valley Mfg. … The correctness of the Board’s Handy Andy rule remains an open question; at least one court of appeals has held that the constitution prohibits *952 the Board from certifying discriminatory unions. See NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mrs. Gladys Selvin

527 F.2d 1273 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 6, 1975

As the Supreme Court in NLRB v. … The Supreme Court in NLRB v. Express Pub.

Pacific Maritime Association v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 2025

The Board ascribes a  INT’L LONGSHORE & WAREHOUSE UNION V. … The Board rejected that argument. See id. at 632–33. 16 INT’L LONGSHORE & WAREHOUSE UNION V. NLRB We reversed the Board’s order. See Kinder Morgan, 978 F.3d at 630.