Case law

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

194 F.2d 211 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 31, 1952

Rule 11 of the Board’s Rules of Practice 2 provides a 30-day period within which petitions may be filed for reconsideration of Board orders. … In United States v.

Brown v. Tromba

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 29, 2026

The district court properly dismissed Brown’s judicial deception claim as barred by Heck v. … The district court properly denied Brown’s motion for summary judgment because it properly dismissed Brown’s action. See Pruitt v.

Willie Frank Brown v. United States

270 F.2d 80 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 11, 1959

The District Court denied Brown the privilege of appealing in forma pau-peris. A like petition is before us and specifically, a court appointed attorney, (Mr. Charles V. … We think perhaps he can by following the procedure outlined in Farley v. United States, 354 U.S. 521 , 77 S.Ct. 1371 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1529 ; Ellis v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co.

99 F.2d 533 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 15, 1938

Compare: Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. National Labor R. Board, 4 Cir., 93 F.2d 985 . … Labor Relations Board v.

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

196 F.2d 933 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1952

This vague reference to the Constitution is totally inadequate to put the due process issue in the' case before the Board; and the Board quite properly did not rule *937 on the point. … The order of the Board is affirmed.

National Labor Relations Board v. Hollywood-Maxwell Co.

126 F.2d 815 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 23, 1942

v. … Firth v. United States, 4 Cir., 253 F. 36 . We agree that, unlike in the case of National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Tovrea Packing Co.

111 F.2d 626 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 30, 1940

The second circuit in National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 872 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co.

94 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 13, 1937

In National Labor Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, supra, 301 U. … Finally, although the precise point in question was not considered in National Labor Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, supra; National Labor Board v. Fruehauf Co., supra; National Labor Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co.

204 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 18, 1953

In National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Nabors, 5 Cir., 196 F.2d 272, 275 , and cases there cited. See also National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co., 2 Cir., 201 F.2d 484 .

British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing Company

585 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 8, 1978

Second, BOAC attempted to avert summary judgment by relying on the report of the Japanese Civil Aeronautics Board (“JCAB”), the agency which investigated the crash. … See Daily Press, Inc. v.

Marriott Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

491 F.2d 367 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 9, 1974

Because the findings made by the Board were supported by substantial evidence, and because the inferences drawn by the Board were reasonable, we have no basis to deny enforcement of the Board’s order. See ICC v. … Marriott has not shown the necessary extraordinary circumstances to excuse its failure to request costs and attorney fees before the Board. See NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co.

125 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 5, 1942

It is the Board’s order which the decree enforces, Amalgamated Utility Workers v. … Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261 , 60 S.Ct. 561 , 84 L.Ed. 738 . Agwilines, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 146 . N.L.R.B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Oregon Worsted Co.

96 F.2d 193 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 11, 1938

As said in National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Oregon Worsted Co., 9 Cir., 94 F.2d 671 . Respondent has now presented a petition for leave to adduce additional evidence under section 10(e) of the act, 29 U.

Pryor v. Railroad Retirement Board

22 F. App'x 784 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 14, 2001

MEMORANDUM ** Patricia Pryor petitions pro se for review of a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board (“Board”) dismissing as untimely her appeal of a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board’s Bureau of Hearings and Appeals … Because the Board’s dismissal of Pryor’s appeal was not a final decision on the merits as contemplated by 45 U.S.C. § 355 (f), we do not have jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision. See Rivera v. R.R. Ret.

National Labor Relations Board v. Continental Hagen Corporation

932 F.2d 828 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 10, 1991

P*I*E Nationwide, Inc., 923 F.2d 506, 512 (7th Cir.1991) (“[i]t is beyond dispute that the Board is a governmental unit”); NLRB v. Edward Cooper Painting, Inc., 804 F.2d 934 (6th Cir.1986); NLRB v. … Id. at 943; see also United States v.

Foreman & Clark, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

215 F.2d 396 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 1954

National Labor Relations Board v. Salant & Salant, Inc.,. 6 Cir., 1948, 171 F.2d 292, 293 ; National. Labor Relations Board v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ethan Enterprises, Inc.

154 F. App'x 23 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 14, 2005

We enforce an order of the NLRB if “its findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and if the Board correctly applied the law....” New Breed Leasing Corp. v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Star Pub. Co.

97 F.2d 465 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 14, 1938

National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telagraph Co., May *471 16, 1938, 58 S.Ct 904 , 82 L.Ed. -; National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., supra; National Labor Board v. Jones & Laughlin Corporation, supra, page 45, 57 S.Ct. page 628. See also: National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

133 F.2d 676 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 15, 1943

We quote a sentence from National Labor Relations Board v. … [Cases cited.] ” Another decision of like tenor is National Labor Relations Board v. Boss Mfg.

Hearst Publications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

136 F.2d 608 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 10, 1943

National Labor Relations Board, 303 U.S. 453, 467 , 58 S.Ct. 656 , 82 L.Ed. 954 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst, 9 Cir., 102 F.2d 658, 662 . … See in accord: Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, 301 U.S. 103, 129 , 57 S.Ct. 650 , 81 L.Ed. 953 ; Virginia Electric & Power Co. v.