Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,632 results
2.52s
Thomas McCarthy v. Sonny Perdue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 22, 2019
But given the selected applicant’s qualifications, we cannot say that McCarthy was “clearly better qualified for the position,” so the Department’s choice between at least two qualified candidates does not raise an inference … He need only establish that his sex was “a motivating factor,” not a but‐for cause, of the hiring decision, but nevertheless there must be some evidence of a causal link. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e‐2(m); see also Univ. of Tex.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States v. Steven C. Griffin, Marvin M. Rux, and Andrae Scurlock, Appeal of Stanley L. Hill
84 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 3, 1996
The third, instance of contempt The government had qualified Agent Malo-ney as an expert in money laundering and structuring transactions based upon his training and experience in the IRS. … Hill’s notice argument is inconsistent with common sense and contrary to established precedent. The essence of Fed.
Cited 16 timesPublishedNathson Fields v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 20, 2020
Burge, 874 F.2d 1201, 1210 n.2 (7th Cir. 1989) (noting that qualified immunity was not raised on appeal but that “[w]e may affirm the district courtʹs decision on any ground that the record fairly supports and the appellee … The court’s findings establish all of those factors.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMario Ortiz-Santiago v. William P. Barr
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 20, 2019
(That rule dictates the end-point of the non-citizen’s qualify- ing residence in the United States for certain immigration ben- efits.) … B With that framework established, we turn back to Ortiz- Santiago.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMark G. Weinberg v. City of Chicago
310 F.3d 1029 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 20, 2002
Weinberg points to the admission by the City that whether speech is considered “topical” is one of the criterion for determining whether something qualifies as a newspaper. … In Graff , a plurality of judges found that the maintenance of a newspaper stand qualifies as conduct commonly associated with expression.
Cited 99 timesPublished203 F.2d 399 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 11, 1953
Plaintiff, since April 20, 1943, has been the qualified and acting Receiver for Sullivan by order of the Circuit Court of Sullivan County, Indiana. … It is rather a strange anomaly that plaintiff, when all the facts and circumstances were fresh in the minds of the parties and with the opportunity clearly presented, not only failed to claim title but also failed to take
Cited 1 timesPublishedThomas, Andre v. Chandler, Nedra
141 F. App'x 484 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 21, 2005
To qualify for habeas relief, Thomas must show that the state court proceedings adjudicating his claim “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal … He submits that the evidence clearly demonstrates that the victim pulled a gun on him and that he shot him in self defense.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDonald Snowden v. Jeremy Henning
72 F.4th 237 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 27, 2023
The Court later rejected statutory remedies created through “judicial mandate,” reinforcing that a cause of action must be supported by congressional intent ex- pressed clearly in statutory text. Id. at 133. … The Court has identified some differences that qualify as “meaningful”: the rank of the officers involved; the constitu- tional right at issue; the generality or specificity of the official action; the
Cited 42 timesPublished657 F.2d 844 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 17, 1981
. *849 We believe that Sarah’s May 9 motion, even under the most generous characterization, fails to qualify as a Rule 59(e) motion. … The appearance contemplated by this statute is clearly more than mere physical presence within the judicial district.
Cited 105 timesPublishedNathson Fields v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 20, 2020
Burge, 874 F.2d 1201, 1210 n.2 (7th Cir. 1989) (noting that qualified immunity was not raised on appeal but that “[w]e may affirm the district courtʹs decision on any ground that the record fairly supports and the appellee … The court’s findings establish all of those factors.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGrieveson, Joseph R. v. Anderson, Frank J.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 18, 2008
We recently considered what qualifies as “verifying medical evidence” in Williams v. … Liefer: Clearly, expert testimony that the plaintiff suffered because of a delay in treatment would satisfy the requirement.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn the Matter of Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France on March 16, 1978
954 F.2d 1279 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 24, 1992
Calvez was qualified as an expert witness, and he properly used hearsay documents in his calculations. See Fed.R.Evid. 703. … SIPCO established the C.I.F. price (for cost, insurance, and freight; see UCC § 2-320).
Cited 207 timesPublishedHumphries, Hedrick G v. CBOCS West, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 10, 2007
Before its decision in Patterson, 491 U.S. 164 (which we shall address below), the Supreme Court had not clearly determined whether section 1981 applied to retaliatory conduct. … It was enough to show “similar—not identi- cal—conduct” and this surely qualifies under that stan- dard. Id. To find otherwise is to lose sight of the big- picture, common-sense perspective.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGovernment Suppliers Consolidating Services, Incorporated v. Bayh
975 F.2d 1267 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 17, 1992
Jurisdiction is clearly proper as to the backhaul ban and the registration and stickering provisions that accompany it. … For these operators, the surety bond would clearly be prohibitive as well.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Trade v. Securities & Exchange Commission
677 F.2d 1137 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 24, 1982
The phrase “transactions involving contracts of sale of a commodity for future delivery” is of ancient origin and established meaning. … Such options clearly fall within the statutory definition of “any instrument commonly known as a ‘security.’ ” See I L. Loss Securities Regulation 469 (2d ed. 1961).
Vacated by Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Board of Trade, 459 U.S. 1026 (1982)Cited 4 timesPublishedLocal P-171, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. Thompson Farms Co.
642 F.2d 1065 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 26, 1981
The date so established shall become the individual’s vacation anniversary date for all vacation purposes thereafter. 34. … While vacations may be taken only if eventually earned, it is clearly the scheme of the contract to permit flexibility in vacation scheduling.
Cited 17 timesPublishedJacobson, Brian v. Lundquist, Timothy
258 F. App'x 45 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 20, 2007
. § 924(e), which mandates a minimum sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment for a defendant convicted under § 922(g)(1) who has accumulated three qualifying prior convictions. … Nonetheless, the district court was correct to conclude that Jacobson could not establish prejudice.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 1, 2023
Department of Education, Establishment of Title 34, 45 Fed. Reg. 30802, 30802 (May 9, 1980). … The plaintiffs have established that the harm they face is on- going, debilitating, and cannot be remedied with monetary damages.
Cited 0 timesPublishedB. E. v. Vigo County School Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 1, 2023
Department of Education, Establishment of Title 34, 45 Fed. Reg. 30802, 30802 (May 9, 1980). … The plaintiffs have established that the harm they face is on- going, debilitating, and cannot be remedied with monetary damages.
Cited 0 timesPublished627 F.3d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 3, 2010
But like most general legal principles it is qualified. As explained in United States ex rel. Knauff v. … Or an immigration officer can, either at a port of entry or at a pre-inspection station, 8 C.F.R. § 235.5 , admit an alien upon determining that he is “clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted” to the United States
Cited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna