Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,632 results
0.96s
United States v. Owens, Antonio
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 21, 2005
The picture clearly portrays Owens as a prisoner in police custody. … Clearly Owens was the only one in the lineup of prisoners who had any concern with the purpose of the lineup. As the Supreme Court recognized in Estelle v.
Cited 0 timesPublished658 F.2d 1242 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 7, 1981
The Mastro Plastics case has been interpreted by the NLRB to stand for the proposition that “only strikes in protest against serious unfair labor practices should be held immune from general ‘no-strike’ clauses,” Arlan’s … Therefore, it was clearly pending when the wildcat strike occurred on May 21.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States v. Patrick Wayde Mealy and Lance B. Spotts
851 F.2d 890 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 1, 1988
In introducing evidence of plea agreements, the prosecutor may not imply that he possessed information not heard by the jury on the issue of the immunized witness’s veracity. … Clearly, the statements by the unarrested conspirators were made in furtherance of the conspiracy and thus were admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E).
Cited 180 timesPublishedMeixiang Cui v. Merrick B. Garland
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 21, 2023
. § 208.13(b)(1). 3 The applicant bears the burden of establishing that she is a qualifying refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i). … Thus, Cui has not met her burden to establish eli- gibility for asylum.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMeixiang Cui v. Merrick B. Garland
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 20, 2023
. § 208.13(b)(1). 3 The applicant bears the burden of establishing that she is a qualifying refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i). … Thus, Cui has not met her burden to establish eli- gibility for asylum.
Cited 0 timesPublished366 F.3d 439 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 23, 2004
recognizing the fiduciary nature of the “trust” relationships set forth as examples in the commentary' — i.e., attorney/client, bank executive/bank client, and doctor/patient relationships — courts have emphasized that, to qualify … Falk, 5 F.3d 210, 213 (7th Cir.1993) (“In order to establish evidence of a fiduciary relationship, the plaintiff must show [first] that she reposed confidence in the defendant .... ”).
Cited 26 timesPublishedSusan E. Hess v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
274 F.3d 456 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 13, 2001
Hess’s 1996 contract clearly states that the draw system was to be phased out as of April 5. … The Hartford policy states that “[i]f [Fleet] gives The Hartford any incorrect information, the relevant facts will be determined” to establish the correct benefit amount.
Cited 155 timesPublished807 F.2d 1339 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 8, 1986
Such use of the streets and public places has, from ancient times, been a part of the privileges, immunities, rights, and liberties of citizens. … Indeed, the Town’s own evidence clearly indicated that the picketing had a negligible impact on traffic.
Reversed on other grounds by Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474 (1988)Cited 19 timesPublishedLINDQUIST FORD, INC. v. Middleton Motors, Inc.
658 F.3d 760 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 13, 2011
The court’s factual findings were clearly erroneous. … Because the judg- ment is premised on clearly erroneous factual findings, it must be reversed. C.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States v. Richardson, Clarence
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 3, 2000
The officers stated, therefore, that they assume that anyone reported dead might be alive unless the report comes from qualified personnel such as a paramedic unit. … Because the testimony could have supported either conclusion, the district court could not have clearly erred when it chose to believe Purnell rather than Richardson. See United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMeixiang Cui v. Merrick B. Garland
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 20, 2023
. § 208.13(b)(1). 3 The applicant bears the burden of establishing that she is a qualifying refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i). … Thus, Cui has not met her burden to establish eli- gibility for asylum.
Cited 0 timesPublished567 F.2d 331 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 6, 1978
Although Board determinations are subject to limited review, they are not immune from judicial scrutiny. … The evidence in the record clearly establishes that Saxon is a highly integrated operation. Each Saxon store is similar in all respects to each of the other Saxon stores in Cook County.
Cited 13 timesPublishedRaul Salazar-Garcia v. Emely Galvan-Pinelo
808 F.3d 1158 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 22, 2015
During the second hearing, D.S. more clearly ob- jected to returning to Mexico. … If they do not live together, what is established by articles 380 and 381 will apply to grant custody of the child.
Cited 30 timesPublishedMichael Massey and John Otten, M.D. v. David Helman
196 F.3d 727 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 13, 2000
By asserting failure to exhaust administrative remedies in their Answers to Massey’s Third and Fourth Amended Complaints, defendants clearly complied with Rule 8(c). … Aside from the woman herself, therefore, the physician is uniquely qualified to litigate the constitutionality of the State’s interference with, or discrimination against, that decision.”
Cited 394 timesPublishedWells Fargo Bank v. Siegel, Paul
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 2, 2008
, and that each contract established a certain sum that Siegel agreed to pay when he signed that particular document. … Siegel’s testimony was neither prepos- terous nor in defiance of the laws of nature, and the court did not clearly err in crediting it.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Melvin L. Medansky
486 F.2d 807 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 2, 1973
The circumstances surrounding the court’s ruling we think clearly met the Perez-Somerville test. … Becker’s testimony with respect thereto, was clearly ambiguous and remained so even after questions by the government.
Cited 23 timesPublished743 F.2d 481 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 24, 1984
Andrew pre-de-ceased Veronica by sixteen months, leaving her property valued at approximately $435,000, of which $336,500 qualified for a marital deduction. … In accordance with established precedent, we find no constitutional defect in the retroactive application of the 1978 amendment to § 2035.
Cited 7 timesPublishedJuana GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INGERSOLL MILLING MACHINE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
133 F.3d 1025 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 14, 1998
On October 17, 1994, Gonzalez was recalled as an F-12 Panel Wire Assembler in Ingersoll’s Pike Road box subassembly plant because the F-12 classification for electrical assemblers had been eliminated and Gonzalez was not qualified … Gonzalez failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination.
Cited 158 timesPublishedSandra Dottenwhy v. Aspirus, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 29, 2024
(“Throughout his Request, Brown clearly demonstrates that his primary concern about the [vac- cination] Policy is the potential harms of the vaccine and his lack of personal autonomy under the mandate, rather than the religious … Passarella’s assertion that her G-d given conscience led her to conclude that she should not be immunized for COVID-19 vaccine was not sufficient to put Aspirus on notice that her objection to the vaccine was grounded in
Cited 0 timesPublishedMegan Passarella v. Aspirus, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 29, 2024
(“Throughout his Request, Brown clearly demonstrates that his primary concern about the [vac- cination] Policy is the potential harms of the vaccine and his lack of personal autonomy under the mandate, rather than the religious … Passarella’s assertion that her G-d given conscience led her to conclude that she should not be immunized for COVID-19 vaccine was not sufficient to put Aspirus on notice that her objection to the vaccine was grounded in
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna