Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca7

9,632 results

0.72s

  • Endres, Benjamin v. Indiana State Police

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 19, 2003

    Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201 (2001), for qualified-immunity appeals by state actors: determine whether the complaint states a claim before inquiring whether the defendants have immunity. … Some are relatively immune from prejudices, be they racial or religious or otherwise; some are not.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States of America Ex Rel. Robert J. Raymond v. People of the State of Illinois

    455 F.2d 62 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 24, 1972

    Yet this is a risk which must be assumed if the great immunity of every person from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law is to be something more than glowing phrases to be mouthed hollowly … Raymond, 42 Ill.2d 564, 568 (1969), the evidence was not necessarily exculpatory, it clearly in my opinion was exculpatory.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. William Boroni

    758 F.2d 222 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 3, 1985

    Jordan, 722 F.2d 353, 356 (7th Cir.1983). 16 A court may admit evidence of a prior criminal act to establish a matter in issue other than propensity to commit the crime charged if: 1) the prior act is similar and close in … To further suggest that "this court has grave doubts as to whether Boroni would have been convicted [without the evidence complained of]" is a statement from which I wish to clearly disassociate myself.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jerome Hunt v. Chicago Housing Authority, a Municipal Corporation, James Gilmartin and Charles Clarke

    972 F.2d 351 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 14, 1992

    Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, "government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … Hunt to defeat the defendants' claim of qualified immunity on the due process claims, he must show "that he had a clearly established property interest in continued employment" with the CHA. Hannon v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Glebocki v. City of Chicago

    32 F. App'x 149 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 19, 2002

    Accordingly, we first inquire whether Glebocki actually established a prima facie case of national origin discrimination. … The City does not contest that Glebocki’s Polish national origin qualifies as a protected class, or that he suffered an adverse action when he was fired.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rubel, Janet v. Pfizer, Incorporated

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 24, 2004

    Local Rule 81.2(a) itself says that the remand is “for failure to establish a basis of federal jurisdiction.” … They would say something like: “We are not contesting the judge’s under- standing of federal jurisdiction but instead we seek review of clearly erroneous finding of fact.” That sort of reasoning would nullify §1447(d).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hauling, Inc. v. Forest Preserve District Of

    821 F.2d 433 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 9, 1987

    Thus, under well-established Illinois law, the District, which is a non-home rule unit of government, is clearly preempted by the IEPA from regulating sanitary landfills. 14 The District argues that the line of cases beginning … According to the District, a municipality that is merely acting as any participant in the market could act is immune from the preemptive effect of state law.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Michael Hiatt v. Rockwell International Corporation

    26 F.3d 761 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 14, 1994

    Roger ... does not establish a causal connection between his claim for medical benefits and his discharge.”) … This prong is not "clearly illogical” as he suggests.

    Cited 90 timesPublished
  • Andrew Walker v. Glen Trammel

    4 F.3d 998 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 1, 1993

    Summary judgment in favor of Trammel was appropriate in this case because the record establishes that Trammel was entitled to qualified immunity. 8 In determining whether a government official is entitled to qualified immunity … and (2) were the constitutional standards clearly established at the time in question? Hill v. Shelander, No. 92-2058, slip op. at 5-6 (7th Cir. Apr. 30, 1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Anthony Esposito

    492 F.2d 6 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 7, 1974

    The language of the statute, its legislative history, and the well established rule of construction that the Criminal Appeals Act is to be strictly construed against the Government, Will v. … We read the Disti-ict Judge’s reference to “facts,” in context, as a reference to the facts alleged in the indictment, and his ruling as holding that Meinbers of Congress are totally immune from prosecution for accepting

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • United States v. Marc L. Polland

    994 F.2d 1262 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 29, 1993

    After Muhammad’s conviction, the government obtained a grant of immunity for him and had him testify before the grand jury. In his testimony, Muhammad implicated Polland in cocaine distribution. … The district court, nevertheless, viewed skeptically the government’s argument concerning the establishment of an attorney-client relationship on June 23.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Antonelli, Michael C v. Sherrow, Tina M.

    246 F. App'x 381 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 5, 2007

    And Antonelli’s written objections to the ATF after the computer’s seizure cannot overcome qualified immunity to constitutional liability because the then clearly established law was that a timely objection by a non- consenting … But these letters do not qualify as claims under the FTCA because they do not request money damages. See 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a).

    Cited 8 timesUnpublished
  • Williams v. Shettle

    914 F.2d 260 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 21, 1990

    That order did not discuss the merits of the original mootness claim, nor did it mention the qualified immunity or Eleventh Amendment claims. … The Turner decision does not explicitly invalidate counseling requirements, and its application to this case is not so straightforward that it can be said to clearly establish the invalidity of such requirements.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Bernard Wilson, Luis Luna, and Manuel Garcia

    134 F.3d 855 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 20, 1998

    Garcia and, clearly, he was a manager and supervisor of others. Garcia argues first that Judge Norgle’s findings were too general in nature to suffice to establish a managerial role. … We also disagree with Garcia’s contention that the district court’s finding regarding his managerial status was clearly erroneous.

    Cited 102 timesPublished
  • United States v. Carrera, David

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 3, 2001

    In order to establish entitlement to this reduction, a defendant must show by a preponderance of the evidence that he: "(1) clearly recognized and accepted responsibility for his conduct; (2) timely notified authorities of … Ed. 2d 1035 (1999) (finding that sec. 841(b) (1)(C) establishes a minimum of three years of supervised release and a maximum of life).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chesser v. Illinois

    895 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 6, 1990

    The defendants’ last challenge also fails to establish error. … But, then again, so did Deason. 9 And since Deason was retained as qualified despite this fact, the strong suggestion from the evidence is that Ches-ser should have been retained as well.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Parks v. Pavkovic

    753 F.2d 1397 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 5, 1985

    This is clearly wrong. … All Handicapped Children Act may be thought to have abrogated that immunity explicitly.

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • United States v. Christopher Jansen

    884 F.3d 649 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 7, 2018

    To be sure, that Steinback was hired to negotiate a plea does not immunize him from a charge of providing ineffective counsel. … This deter- mination was not clearly erroneous.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of Innovative Construction Systems, Inc., Debtor-Appellant

    793 F.2d 875 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 9, 1986

    The district judge stated, “[hjindsight clearly shows [Bodilly’s] conclusion to be virtually without foundation.” We wholly concur. … Allphin, 786 F.2d 268 (7th Cir.1986) (defense of qualified immunity).

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Gina PIRAINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL ORIENTATION RESOURCES, INC., Defendant-Appellee

    84 F.3d 270 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 21, 1996

    IOR did so, Piraino continues, either by crafting its leave of absence policy so that she could not qualify, or by implementing its policy to accomplish her discharge, or both. … A jury could find that her call to Perlman in early January 1991 asking whether she needed to submit a written notice for a leave indicated clearly that she did not believe she had voluntarily resigned.

    Cited 43 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.