Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,632 results
1.37s
National Labor Relations Board v. General Indicator Corporation, Redco Division
707 F.2d 279 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 10, 1983
This balancing process, resting initially with the Board, is not immune from judicial review.” NLRB v. Prescott Industrial Products Co., 500 F.2d 6, 10 (8th Cir.1974) (footnote omitted). … The testimony at the hearing clearly established that Rhines had a history of disrupting the work assignments of his co-employees and causing dissension and turmoil within the Company’s plant.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMerian Rohrabaugh, Administratrix of the Estate of John T. Lemen, Sr., Deceased v. United States
611 F.2d 211 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 18, 1979
By letter of March 30, 1978, taxpayer was notified that the claim was disallowed because she had "failed to establish reasonable cause for the late filing." … Moreover, the court has indirectly but effectively immunized a negligent attorney from what appears to be an open and shut malpractice suit.
Cited 17 timesPublishedAlexander, Nathan D. v. Deangelo, Joseph
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 22, 2003
But we have yet to consider the defense of qualified immunity. Although the principle that battery under color of law is actionable under section 1983 is well established, Rogers v. … Wellham, supra, 104 F.3d at 628, a plaintiff does not defeat the immunity defense “simply by alleging violation of extremely abstract rights. . . .
Cited 0 timesPublished117 F.3d 1001 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 27, 1997
See 946 F.2d at 558 (“[i]f having established that he is now totally disabled by black lung disease, *1009 the claimant also establishes that his present condition is substantially worse than it was the first time he applied … , that should be enough to establish his entitlement”).
Cited 29 timesPublishedWallace Davis v. Joseph Freels
583 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 25, 1978
FITZPATRICK: Your Honor, if it is a matter of geometry, and I think that is all it is, the degree of angle, I would think that a jury is qualified to know whether it is 45° or 90° or 30°. … regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
Cited 36 timesPublished650 F.2d 885 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 3, 1981
However, it is also well established that “to say that a district court may exercise discretion is not to say that such discretion is unreviewable. … The Second Circuit affirmed the denial because of the apparent availability to the defendant of the defenses of immunity, timeliness, and the regularity of the state’s confinement procedures.
Abrogated on other grounds by Dee Farmer v. Richard Haas, Edward J. Brennan, and L.E. Dubois, 990 F.2d 319 (1993)Cited 310 timesPublishedTyree Neal, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 5, 2025
The Sixth Amendment establishes the right to effective as- sistance of counsel. U.S. Const. amend. VI; Strickland v. Wash- ington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984). … Even in De La Torre, we qualified our decision as “not solely dependent on the definition of methamphetamine and which of its isomers do or do not exist.” De La Torre, 940 F.3d at 952.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBranham, Gary L. v. Snow, John W.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 17, 2004
We see no reason to revisit the established law of this circuit in this case. … On this record, the agency has not established otherwise.
Cited 0 timesPublished895 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 6, 1990
It only establishes that Chesser had a less than stellar performance record as a probationary trooper. … But, then again, so did Deason. 9 And since Deason was retained as qualified despite this fact, the strong suggestion from the evidence is that Chesser should have been retained as well.
Cited 16 timesPublishedMorales, Alfonso v. Jones, Arthur
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 17, 2007
Morales’s speech was protected in its entirety by the First Amendment, I will briefly address the question of qualified immunity. … In the alternative, the defendants asked that we find that they are entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIndustrial Electron v. iPower Dist Group
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 31, 2000
Under these well established principles, Industrial Electronics cannot bring a suit to assert rights under the franchise agreement for injuries to the association or indirectly to the members as shareholders. … However, because we hold that Industrial Electronics may only assert claims under the association ag- reement or as a third-party beneficiary of the franchise agreement, the immunity conferred by the Wisconsin LLC does not
Cited 0 timesPublishedWisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States
856 F.3d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 8, 2017
For one, as I alluded to above, “it is well established that RRTA and FICA are parallel statutes.” BNSF Ry. Co. v. United States, 775 F.3d 743, 754 (5th Cir. 2015). … However, “absent a clearly established congressional intention, repeals by implication are not favored.” Branch v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPalmetto Properties v. County of DuPage
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 7, 2004
First, under the law as adopted in 1986, DuPage County required all adult businesses to locate in a zoning district designated “industrial” and banned such establish- ments from locating within 1000 feet of other adult busi … Although we have not gone so far as to hold that Buckhannon applies to all fee-shifting statutes, we have held that it is conclusively presumed to so apply absent a clearly contrary indication in the “text, structure, or
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeorge Wolfe v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
710 F.2d 388 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 22, 1983
For purposes of administering the LTD Plan, Penney established the defendant-appellant J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Voluntary Employee’s Beneficiary Association (“Association”). … Wolfe feels that George may qualify for some type of disability earnings.
Overruled on other grounds by Daniel T. Casey v. Uddeholm Corporation, a New York Corporation and Uddeholm Health Benefits Plan, 32 F.3d 1094 (1994)Cited 145 timesPublished905 F.2d 1077 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 22, 1990
Degler’s affidavit establishes that all of Mestayer’s claims were timely paid, and that the only amounts left unpaid were those for which Mestayer was responsible. . … Furthermore, seeking more than $12 million in damages for a case of this nature was clearly excessive. WPS requests further sanctions for Mes-tayer’s decision to file a frivolous appeal.
Cited 40 timesPublishedMemorial Hospital Of Carbondale v. Heckler
760 F.2d 771 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 11, 1985
The offset requirement is held to apply on the theory that an account established with borrowed funds cannot qualify as funded depreciation under 42 C.F.R. Sec. 405.419(b)(2)(iii). … For cost reporting years beginning on or after December 1, 1982, section 226.5 provides that funds established with borrowed money will not qualify as funded depreciation, that interest on such borrowing is an allowable cost
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoosier Penn Oil Company v. Ashland Oil Company
934 F.2d 882 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 19, 1991
That agreement, among other things: divided the state into marketing areas; authorized the establishment of sales quotas; gave Master approval rights of any sales personnel Williams sought to employ; and established mandatory … That in itself is sufficient to affirm the district court, since Hoosier must prove *886 both clauses of the statutory definition to qualify as a “franchise.”
Cited 6 timesPublishedJesse Webster v. United States
667 F.3d 826 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 19, 2011
This factual finding is not clearly erroneous, and it resolves Webster’s appeal. … The judge found the evidence insuf- ficient to establish that improper deliberations had actually occurred.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 28, 2000
Even assuming Woods’ recitation of events is accurate, he has still failed to establish the prejudice prong under Strickland. … /4 Woods does not dispute that he has two qualifying violent felonies: his Illinois convictions in 1981 (attempted armed robbery) and 1988 (rob- bery).
Cited 0 timesPublishedZimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. v. Mary Insall
108 F.4th 512 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 12, 2024
We begin by emphasizing that the FAA and Supreme Court precedent establish that “arbitration awards are largely immune from … scrutiny in court.” Nano Gas Techs., Inc. v. … An arbitral award most clearly violates public policy when it creates an explicit conflict with statutory laws or well- established and easily discernible precedent. Titan Tire Corp. of Freeport v.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna