Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,632 results
1.84s
Lawline v. American Bar Association
956 F.2d 1378 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 5, 1992
Mine Workers does not establish laypersons’ right to associate with lawyers in the abstract. … In addition, the United States Trustee and the Assistant United States Trustee are immune from a § 1983 suit because they are federal officers and their actions fall short of establishing a private conspiracy with state officials
Cited 65 timesPublishedGerald Covell v. Harmon Menkis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 8, 2010
to qualified immunity. … As we conclude that Covell was an at-will employee, it is unnecessary to discuss whether the Defen- dants would be covered under qualified immunity. B.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmith, Michael B. v. Lamz, Douglas
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 5, 2003
immunity. … Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, probable cause to arrest will defeat an unlawful-arrest claim. See Jenkins v.
Cited 0 timesPublished565 F.3d 393 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 13, 2009
Officers, they say, will often be “sheltered by qualified immunity.” That is true in some cases just as it is true that the many exceptions to the exclusionary rule often prevent vindication of Fourth Amendment rights. … apartment was not clearly established.
Cited 39 timesPublishedTerril A. Kraushaar v. Earl K. Flanigan, Fred Winterroth, Robin Davis, and Tazewell County
45 F.3d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 13, 1995
Similarly, we are unable to find that the defendant is entitled to qualified immunity. … Secondly, there are several cases which suggest that qualified immunity would not exist for a strip search conducted in public view. See Logan v.
Cited 112 timesPublishedUnited States v. J. C. Smothers
435 F.2d 209 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 30, 1970
We hold the findings of the trial court that defendant’s confession was not obtained by any promise of immunity are clearly supported by evidence in the record. Admittedly there was a question of credibility involved. … The evidence clearly justified an inference by the jury that the defendant was aware of the participation by the St. Louis bank.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States v. Marvin Dexter Linnear
40 F.3d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 16, 1994
The total of 13 points established a criminal history category of VI. … The appellant next argues that he lacks the requisite prior felony convictions to qualify as a career offender.
Cited 38 timesPublishedJerome B. Hansen v. John C. Ahlgrimm and Harley Brown
520 F.2d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 8, 1975
Rickover, 369 U.S. 111, 112 , 82 S.Ct. 580 , 7 L.Ed.2d 604 (1962), and is clearly precluded in the absence of any actionable live case or controversy. Golden v. … from liability under the facts alleged are insufficient to establish liability of the private persons under color of state law for purposes of the Civil Rights Act.
Cited 53 timesPublishedUlichny, Susan v. Merton Comm School
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 7, 2001
Qualified Immunity Finally, we hold that the individual defendants are entitled to qualified immunity./18 In Hinnen v. … That clearly established right must be one established in a particularized sense. This requires more than a general violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWalter Goudy v. Rodney Cummings
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 1, 2019
Cummings and Napier urge us to frame the qualified immunity issue regarding the notes as follows: “whether it was clearly established in 1994 that an initial denial of in‐ volvement by a suspect, when … But if they did, they cannot use qualified immunity to avoid liabil‐ ity.
Cited 0 timesPublished577 F.3d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 14, 2009
Additionally, as the district court recognized, qualified immunity protects officers who “reasonably but mistakenly conclude that probable cause is present.” Burns v. … Given Hibbert’s affidavit and the finding of probable cause by the judge, these two officers are each entitled to qualified immunity.
Overruled on other grounds by McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)Cited 77 timesPublishedBennie Lenard, Cross-Appellant v. Robert Argento & Joseph Sansone v. Village of Melrose Park
699 F.2d 874 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 15, 1983
At the time this trial was conducted, municipalities possessed a qualified immunity under Monell v. New York, supra, though the trial court was aware of pending action in the Supreme Court on this issue. … For the purposes of Rule 4(a), a motion to reconsider has been held to qualify as a Rule 59(e) motion. Richerson v. Jones, 572 F.2d 89 , 93 (3d Cir.1978); Jones v.
Cited 235 timesPublishedRobert C. Braun v. Leverett Baldwin
346 F.3d 761 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 10, 2003
An officer is shielded from liability under the doctrine of qualified immunity if his conduct “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … To evaluate a claim of qualified immunity, we engage in a two-step analysis, asking: (1) “whether the plaintiffi’s] claim states a violation of [his] constitutional rights,” and then (2) “whether those rights were clearly
Cited 35 timesPublishedGolden v. HELEN SIGMAN & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
611 F.3d 356 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 2, 2010
Grant, 22 F.3d 149, 157 (7th Cir. 1994), clearly granted Sigman absolute immunity under Illinois law. … IV Both Sigman and Thomas have asked this court to impose sanctions on Golden for pursuing an appeal that clearly lacked merit.
Cited 58 timesPublished51 F.3d 726 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 5, 1995
Plaintiffs thus qualify as prevailing parties under § 1988. C. Was the Award of Fees “Reasonable”? … Rather, we will continue to rely on the established caselaw to determine whether a nonunion municipal employee is entitled to attorney's fees in cases such as this. 13 .
Cited 51 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 14, 2026
To begin, although a plaintiff can plead himself out of court by making factual allegations that are clearly incompatible with liability, such an argument always must be evaluated skeptically. 3 Mr. … Miao will have to establish that the flight at- tendant treated him differently from persons of another race and did so intentionally.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 14, 2026
To begin, although a plaintiff can plead himself out of court by making factual allegations that are clearly incompatible with liability, such an argument always must be evaluated skeptically. 3 Mr. … Miao will have to establish that the flight at- tendant treated him differently from persons of another race and did so intentionally.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Tony Hurlburt
835 F.3d 715 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 29, 2016
Hurlburt has a prior conviction for armed burglary, and at sentencing he con *719 ceded that this conviction qualifies as a predicate crime of violence. … Second, the residual clause “leaves uncertainty about how much risk it takes for a crime to qualify as a violent felony.” Id. at 2558.
Cited 58 timesPublishedDr. Iris I. Varner, and United States of America, Intervening v. Illinois State University
226 F.3d 927 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 6, 2000
In our initial consideration of this case, we affirmed the district court in all respects, finding that Congress clearly intended to abrogate the States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity through its passage of the Equal Pay Act … ’ claim of sovereign immunity and denied their motion to dismiss.
Cited 50 timesPublishedDennis L. Olson v. Robert Tyler and O.J. Foster
771 F.2d 277 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 21, 1985
The good faith immunity doctrine shields officers from liability if their conduct did not violate clearly established constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Harlow v. … It is clearly established that the fourth amendment requires a truthful factual showing sufficient to constitute probable cause. Franks, 438 U.S. at 164 , 98 S.Ct. at 2680 .
Cited 95 timesPublished
Ask Donna