Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca7

9,632 results

1.84s

  • Lawline v. American Bar Association

    956 F.2d 1378 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 5, 1992

    Mine Workers does not establish laypersons’ right to associate with lawyers in the abstract. … In addition, the United States Trustee and the Assistant United States Trustee are immune from a § 1983 suit because they are federal officers and their actions fall short of establishing a private conspiracy with state officials

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Gerald Covell v. Harmon Menkis

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 8, 2010

    to qualified immunity. … As we conclude that Covell was an at-will employee, it is unnecessary to discuss whether the Defen- dants would be covered under qualified immunity. B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith, Michael B. v. Lamz, Douglas

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 5, 2003

    immunity. … Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, probable cause to arrest will defeat an unlawful-arrest claim. See Jenkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Guzman v. City of Chicago

    565 F.3d 393 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 13, 2009

    Officers, they say, will often be “sheltered by qualified immunity.” That is true in some cases just as it is true that the many exceptions to the exclusionary rule often prevent vindication of Fourth Amendment rights. … apartment was not clearly established.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Terril A. Kraushaar v. Earl K. Flanigan, Fred Winterroth, Robin Davis, and Tazewell County

    45 F.3d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 13, 1995

    Similarly, we are unable to find that the defendant is entitled to qualified immunity. … Secondly, there are several cases which suggest that qualified immunity would not exist for a strip search conducted in public view. See Logan v.

    Cited 112 timesPublished
  • United States v. J. C. Smothers

    435 F.2d 209 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 30, 1970

    We hold the findings of the trial court that defendant’s confession was not obtained by any promise of immunity are clearly supported by evidence in the record. Admittedly there was a question of credibility involved. … The evidence clearly justified an inference by the jury that the defendant was aware of the participation by the St. Louis bank.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Marvin Dexter Linnear

    40 F.3d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 16, 1994

    The total of 13 points established a criminal history category of VI. … The appellant next argues that he lacks the requisite prior felony convictions to qualify as a career offender.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Jerome B. Hansen v. John C. Ahlgrimm and Harley Brown

    520 F.2d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 8, 1975

    Rickover, 369 U.S. 111, 112 , 82 S.Ct. 580 , 7 L.Ed.2d 604 (1962), and is clearly precluded in the absence of any actionable live case or controversy. Golden v. … from liability under the facts alleged are insufficient to establish liability of the private persons under color of state law for purposes of the Civil Rights Act.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Ulichny, Susan v. Merton Comm School

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 7, 2001

    Qualified Immunity Finally, we hold that the individual defendants are entitled to qualified immunity./18 In Hinnen v. … That clearly established right must be one established in a particularized sense. This requires more than a general violation of the Fourth Amendment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walter Goudy v. Rodney Cummings

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 1, 2019

    Cummings and Napier urge us to frame the qualified  immunity  issue  regarding  the  notes  as  follows:  “whether  it  was  clearly  established  in  1994  that  an  initial  denial  of  in‐ volvement  by  a  suspect,  when … But  if  they did, they cannot use qualified immunity to avoid liabil‐ ity. 

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Justice v. Town of Cicero

    577 F.3d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 14, 2009

    Additionally, as the district court recognized, qualified immunity protects officers who “reasonably but mistakenly conclude that probable cause is present.” Burns v. … Given Hibbert’s affidavit and the finding of probable cause by the judge, these two officers are each entitled to qualified immunity.

    Overruled on other grounds by McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)Cited 77 timesPublished
  • Bennie Lenard, Cross-Appellant v. Robert Argento & Joseph Sansone v. Village of Melrose Park

    699 F.2d 874 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 15, 1983

    At the time this trial was conducted, municipalities possessed a qualified immunity under Monell v. New York, supra, though the trial court was aware of pending action in the Supreme Court on this issue. … For the purposes of Rule 4(a), a motion to reconsider has been held to qualify as a Rule 59(e) motion. Richerson v. Jones, 572 F.2d 89 , 93 (3d Cir.1978); Jones v.

    Cited 235 timesPublished
  • Robert C. Braun v. Leverett Baldwin

    346 F.3d 761 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 10, 2003

    An officer is shielded from liability under the doctrine of qualified immunity if his conduct “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … To evaluate a claim of qualified immunity, we engage in a two-step analysis, asking: (1) “whether the plaintiffi’s] claim states a violation of [his] constitutional rights,” and then (2) “whether those rights were clearly

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Golden v. HELEN SIGMAN & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

    611 F.3d 356 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 2, 2010

    Grant, 22 F.3d 149, 157 (7th Cir. 1994), clearly granted Sigman absolute immunity under Illinois law. … IV Both Sigman and Thomas have asked this court to impose sanctions on Golden for pursuing an appeal that clearly lacked merit.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • James Eric Johnson and Jerry M. Croker v. Lafayette Fire Fighters Association Local 472, International Association of Fire Fighters, Afl-Cio-Clc

    51 F.3d 726 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 5, 1995

    Plaintiffs thus qualify as prevailing parties under § 1988. C. Was the Award of Fees “Reasonable”? … Rather, we will continue to rely on the established caselaw to determine whether a nonunion municipal employee is entitled to attorney's fees in cases such as this. 13 .

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Yubo Miao v. UAL

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 14, 2026

    To begin, although a plaintiff can plead himself out of court by making factual allegations that are clearly incompatible with liability, such an argument always must be evaluated skeptically. 3 Mr. … Miao will have to establish that the flight at- tendant treated him differently from persons of another race and did so intentionally.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yubo Miao v. UAL

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 14, 2026

    To begin, although a plaintiff can plead himself out of court by making factual allegations that are clearly incompatible with liability, such an argument always must be evaluated skeptically. 3 Mr. … Miao will have to establish that the flight at- tendant treated him differently from persons of another race and did so intentionally.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Tony Hurlburt

    835 F.3d 715 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 29, 2016

    Hurlburt has a prior conviction for armed burglary, and at sentencing he con *719 ceded that this conviction qualifies as a predicate crime of violence. … Second, the residual clause “leaves uncertainty about how much risk it takes for a crime to qualify as a violent felony.” Id. at 2558.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Dr. Iris I. Varner, and United States of America, Intervening v. Illinois State University

    226 F.3d 927 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 6, 2000

    In our initial consideration of this case, we affirmed the district court in all respects, finding that Congress clearly intended to abrogate the States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity through its passage of the Equal Pay Act … ’ claim of sovereign immunity and denied their motion to dismiss.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Dennis L. Olson v. Robert Tyler and O.J. Foster

    771 F.2d 277 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 21, 1985

    The good faith immunity doctrine shields officers from liability if their conduct did not violate clearly established constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Harlow v. … It is clearly established that the fourth amendment requires a truthful factual showing sufficient to constitute probable cause. Franks, 438 U.S. at 164 , 98 S.Ct. at 2680 .

    Cited 95 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.