Case law

United States v. Reilly

662 F.3d 754 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 2, 2011

United States v. Webb, 616 F.3d 605, 609 (6th Cir. 2010). Reasonableness “has both a procedural and substantive component.” United States v. Brown, 579 F.3d 672, 677 (6th Cir. 2009) (citing United States v. … Brown, 579 F.3d 672, 687 (6th Cir. 2009) (“Ultimately, Defendant’s arguments appear to contend that, given his personal characteristics, a different sentence was justified.

Henry Hilinski v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Steven F. Woods v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

237 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 1956

Compare Brown v. Helvering, 1934, 291 U.S. 193 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 . Moreover the petitioners never contested their obligation to finish the guns under the contract. See Security Flour Mills Co. v. … Commissioner, 1944, 321 U.S. 281 , 64 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed. 725 ; Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner, 1944, 320 U.S. 516 , 64 S.Ct. 364 , 88 L.Ed. 420 ; Lucas v.

Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation Michael Rucker, Individually Michael Butler, Individually Meroney Entertainment, Inc., D/B/A Ken's Gold Club, a Tennessee Corporation the Pleasure Palace, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation Dawn Pierce, Individually Elizabeth Martz, Individually Jerry C. Pendergrass, Individually the 822 Corporation the 421 Corporation, (99-5071),plaintiffs-Appellees (00-5881),plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants (00-5284/5288) v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee Emmett Turner, Chief of Police of the Metropolitan Police Department, (99-5071), (00-5881), Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees (00-5284/5288)

274 F.3d 377 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 2001

The appeal procedures under the Ordinance are essentially identical whether the Board initially refuses to grant a license, or whether the Board suspends or revokes an already-existing license. … For example, G & V Lounge, Inc. v.

Howard Atkins v. Georgia Crowell

945 F.3d 476 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 2019

See Brown v. Jordan, 563 S.W.3d 196, 197, 200–02 (Tenn. 2018) (discussing Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-  No. 18-6012 Atkins v. Crowell Page 2 501(h)–(i)). … See Brown, 563 S.W.3d at 197. Miller’s holding simply does not cover a lengthy term of imprisonment that falls short of life without parole. See Starks v. Easterling, 659 F. App’x 277, 280–81 (6th Cir. 2016); cf.

Morgan v. Tennessee Department of Corrections

92 F. App'x 302 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 2004

Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 740-41 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir.1999).

Moran v. Peck

294 F. 80 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1923

Edmonson v. Bloomshire, 7 Wall. (74 U. S.) 306, 310, 19 L. Ed. 91 ; Caillot v. Deetken, 133 U. S. 215, 216 , 5 Sup. Ct. 432, 28 L. Ed. 983 . However, in Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 505, 507 , 25 L. … That the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Appeals continued until a complete term had both begun and ended after the appeal was taken, has been assumed in the Fourth circuit (Pender v. Brown, 120 Fed. 496 , 56 C. C.

United States v. Henley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 2004

United States v. … Turner testified that one night at her home, she Finally, Henley challenges the district court’s admission of observed Chad Brown’s head bleeding.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,530 John A. Mader v. Daniel E. Armel

461 F.2d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 15, 1972

control of the Board of Directors and the executive committee, as well as other corporate officers. … See Demarco v. Edens, 390 F.2d 836 (2d Cir. 1968); Klapmeier v. Telecheck International, 315 F.Supp. 1360 (D.Minn.1970). We hold that the findings of fact of the District Court are not “clearly erroneous.”

MacLeod v. Graven

79 F. 84 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 1897

Insurance Co. v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374 , 16 Sup. Ct. 318; Werner v. Charleston, 151 U. S. 360 , 14 Sup. Ct. 356; Brown v. Baxter, 146 U. S. 619 ,13 Sup. Ct. 260; Meagher v. Manufacturing Co., 145 U. S. 608 , 12 Sup. … Ct. 876; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197 , 12 Sup. Ct. 664; Johnson v. Keith, 117 U. S. 199 , 6 Sup. Ct. 669; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3 , 1 Sup. Ct. 15; Houston v.

Graham-Humphreys v. Memphis Brooks

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 2000

(brackets and ellipse omitted) (quoting Baldwin County days later, on January 6, 1995, Graham-Humphreys gave birth Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 (1984)). 18 Graham-Humphreys v. … Irwin 1996 certified RTS notice addressed to the plaintiff. v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 96 (1990); 2 Andrews v. Orr, 851 F.2d 146, 151 (6th Cir. 1988); Brown v.

McFarland ex rel. McFarland v. Jefferson County Public Schools

416 F.3d 513 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 21, 2005

The district court concluded that the assignment plan met the constraints of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because the school board had a compelling interest to use the racial guidelines and applied … McFarland v. Jefferson County Public Schools, 330 F.Supp.2d 834 (W.D.Ky.2004).

Kenneth Kersey v. Tennessee Board of Paroles Charles Traughber Gayle Barbee Ansel McDuffy Bob Gower Randall Chester

82 F.3d 418 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 17, 1996

Kenneth KERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLES; Charles Traughber; Gayle Barbee; Ansel McDuffy; Bob Gower; Randall Chester, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-5870. … See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 593 (6th Cir.1989). Accordingly, plaintiff's claims for money damages and for declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to the defendant state agencies are without basis in law.

Hoover-Bond Co. v. Denman

59 F.2d 909 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1932

Board of Tax Appeals in Appeal of B. B. Todd, Inc., 1 B. T. A. 762, for lack of any statutory basis. … If plaintiff was entitled to file its 1917 return on the installment basis rather than the accrual basis [which both tho District Judge and the Board of Tax Appeals doubt — see Hoover-Bond Co. v.

Freeman C. Edmaiston v. William S. Neil, Warden

452 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1971

Lothridge v. United States, 441 F.2d 919 (6th Cir. 1971); United States v. Harris, 412 F.2d 471 (6th Cir. 1969) ; Hoopengarner v. United States, 270 F.2d 465, 469 (6th Cir. 1959); Parker v. … I would affirm for the reasons stated by Chief Judge Bailey Brown in his Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Petition and Dismissing Action, 334 F.Supp. 1316 .

State of Ohio Ex Rel. Hon. Fred Williams v. Honorable Thomas D. Lambros, United States District Judge

512 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 6, 1975

The district court case is captioned Maria Nespeca v. Mahoning County Board of Elections et al., No. C 75-7-Y. … Maloney v. James A.

L.P. Cavett Company v. United States Department of Labor

101 F.3d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1996

with law.” 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A); Communities, Inc. v. … Circuit court in Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. v. Reich, 24 F.3d 1447 (D.C.Cir.1994), and Building & Construction Trades Dep’t, AFL-CIO v.

Cynthia Huffman v. The Hilltop Companies

747 F.3d 391 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 2014

Blickensderfer, Eugene Droder III, FROST BROWN TODD LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Adam W. Hansen, NICHOLS KASTER, LLP, San Francisco, California, Rachhana T. … LexisNexis Div. v.

Henderson v. United States

255 F.2d 929 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 1958

See Schumpert v. United States, 6 Cir., 1955, 226 F.2d 578 ; Brown v. United States, 6 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 589 . Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed.

Coalition to Defend v. Granholm

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 6, 2007

Browne, Alan W. Foutz, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, Sacramento, California, Charles J. Cooper, Michael W. Kirk, COOPER & KIRK, Washington, D.C., Kerry L. … Each wishes to intervene in an action brought against (1) Jennifer Granholm, the Governor of Michigan, and (2) the Regents of the University of Michigan, the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, and the Board of

Hume v. Sterling

48 F.3d 1219 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 10, 1995

Sec. 67-5-1511, Hume may appeal the decision of Tennessee's Board of Equalization to the state courts of Tennessee. … Judicial review of the Board's decision must consist of a new hearing based on the administrative record and any additional evidence the parties may submit.