Case law

B. F. Avery & Sons Co. v. Glenn

106 F.2d 613 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 18, 1939

As pointed out in United States v. … See also RaybestosManhattan Co. v. U. S., 296 U.S. 60 , 56 S.Ct. 63 , 80 L.Ed. 44 , 102 A.L.R. 111 ; Standard Oil Co. of Calif, v. U. S., 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 571 ; United States v.

Maharg, Inc. v. Van Wert Solid Waste Management District

249 F.3d 544 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 2001

The board was evidently unpersuaded. … See Quill Corp. v.

Warren Bros. v. Nelson

635 F.2d 552 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 5, 1980

See Decision of the Benefits Review Board in Nelson v. Warren Brothers, BRB No. 76-414 & 76-414A (Jan. 24, 1978). Legal doctrine supports this factual determination. … The decision of the Benefits Review Board is affirmed. .

Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. v. Walker Bin Co.

230 F. 453 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1916

Walker Co. v. Brown (C. C. Pa.) 110 Fed. 649 ; Walker Co. v. Miller (C. C. Pa.) 132 Fed. 823 ; Miller v. Walker Co. (C. C. A. 3) 139 Fed. 134 , 71 C. C. A. 398 ; Walker Co. v. Gloekler (D. C. … Pa.), affirmed in 225 Fed. 46 ; Gloekler v. Walker Co. (C. C. A. 3) 225 Fed. 46 , 140 C. C. A. 372 ; Walker Co. v. Liebe (D. C. La.) 224 Fed. 516 , affirmed in 225 Fed. 45 , 140 C. C. A. 371 ; Liebe v. Walker Co. (C. C.

Garcia v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

782 F.3d 736 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 2015

Phillips v. … Vail v.

Robert Odell, Jr. v. Kalitta Air, LLC

107 F.4th 523 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 9, 2024

If they are not resolved “on the property,” minor disputes must be resolved through arbitration by either the National Railroad Adjustment Board (“Board”) or “a privately established arbitration panel.” Id. … Judicial review of the Board’s decision is restricted to: “(1) failure of the Adjustment Board to comply with the requirements of the [RLA]; (2) failure of the Adjustment Board to conform, or confine, itself to matters within

Sells Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner

41 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 1930

The return was not before the Board of Tax Appeals and is not in this record. … The burden was on the petitioner to show before the Board of Tax Appeals that the action of the Commissioner was wrong. Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U. S. 101 , 48 S. Ct. 43 , 72 L. Ed. 184 ; Austin Company v.

Roy Lee Smartt v. Harry S. Avery, Commissioner of Corrections and C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary

411 F.2d 408 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 1969

After the Supreme Court announced its decision in Mempa v. … See Johnson v. Walker, 317 F.2d 418 (C.A. 5 1963) (which we have followed in many unpublished opinions in the Sixth Circuit.)

Sylvester Gavin v. H. Gary Wells

914 F.2d 97 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 19, 1990

See Crank v. Duckworth, 905 F.2d 1090, 1091 (7th Cir.1990). … At most, Gavin asserts that the state parole board violated a state procedural rule in considering his allegedly invalid 1955 conviction, a claim that does not rise to federal constitutional proportions. See Wallace v.

Csx Transportation, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United Transportation Union General Committees of Adjustment

395 F.3d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 19, 2005

Should that mediation fail, a Presidential Emergency Board may be appointed. Id. § 160. Throughout the entire process, the existing agreement remains intact. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line R.R. v. United Transp. … Union v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry.

Bowen v. James Vernor Co.

89 F.2d 968 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1937

This court thought that Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U.S. 238 , 56 S.Ct. 855 , 80 L.Ed. 1160 , and the authorities there relied on, required a holding in Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Fruehauf Trailer Company, 57 S.Ct 642 , 81 L.Ed. -, decided April 12, 1937.

Jamerson v. Michigan Department of Corrections

65 F. App'x 1000 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 2003

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 739-41 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … See Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 645 (6th Cir.1999); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

Toledo Scale Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Toledo Scale Corporation

351 F.2d 173 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 9, 1965

Court made it clear in Morgan v. … Lavin v. Pierotti, supra, [ 129 F.2d 883 , 29 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1235]; Steenstrup v. Heath, 95 F.2d 514, 517 , 25 C.C.P.A., Patents, 981, 986; Van Auken v. Cummings, supra.” Field v.

Bo Guess v. Hocking County Childrens Services Board

92 F.3d 1185 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 1, 1996

Bo GUESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOCKING COUNTY CHILDRENS SERVICES BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-4357. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … See Mann v. Conlin, 22 F.3d 100, 105 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 193 (1994).

Bill Call Ford, Inc., and Mid-Ohio Ford Jeep Eagle, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company

48 F.3d 201 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 1995

Russo v. City of Cincinnati, 953 F.2d 1036 , 1041—42 (6th Cir. 1992) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2519 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986), and citing Vollrath v. … any suit, and Call did not appeal to the Dealer Policy Board.

Chesbrough v. Woodworth

195 F. 875 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1912

The comptroller’s letter was presented to the board. … In Huebel v.

Alexander v. Carrick

31 F. App'x 176 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 19, 2002

See Mowatt v. Brown, No. 89-1955, 902 F.2d 34 , 1990 WL 59896 at * 1 (6th Cir. May 9, 1990); Tate v. Brown, No. 89-1944, 902 F.2d 35 , 1990 WL 58403 at *1 (6th Cir. May 3, 1990); Howard v. … See Turner v. Scott, 119 F.3d 425, 429 (6th Cir.1997).

Akron Center for Reproductive Health, an Ohio Corporation Max Pierre Gaujean, M.D., Individually and on Behalf of His Patients Patty Poe, a Minor, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated Persons v. Lynn Slaby, Etc. v. State of Ohio, Intervenor-Appellant

854 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 1988

See Doe v. … See Acme Eng'g Co. v. Jones, 150 Ohio St. 423 , 83 N.E.2d 202 (1948); CADO Business Sys. v. Board of Educ., 8 Ohio App.3d 385 , 457 N.E.2d 939 (1983); see also Tamele v.

John Paterek v. Village of Armada

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 8, 2015

Ultimately, the Village Council dissolved the DDA board in early 2013 and appointed Delecke as the new Chairman of the DDA; the Planning Commission constituted the new board. … See, e.g., Brown v. Crowley, 312 F.3d 782, 790 (6th Cir. 2002) (issuing baseless citations in response to a plaintiff’s protected speech activities violates the First Amendment); Warren v.

Berry v. School District of Benton Harbor

505 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 1974

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 18 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Green v. … Wright v. Council of City of Emporia, 407 U.S. 451, 461-462 , 92 S.Ct. 2196 , 33 L.Ed.2d 51 (1971); see United States v. Texas Education Agency, supra; Mahaley v.