Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Corry Foam Products Co., Firestone Foam Products Co., a Division of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

489 F.2d 807 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 27, 1973

It involves of necessity a large measure of informed discretion, and the decision of the Board, if not final, is rarely to be disturbed.” Packard Motor Car Co. v. N. L. R. … B. v. Tallahassee Coca Cola Bottling Co., Inc., 409 F.2d 201 (5th Cir. 1969).

Cone v. New Britain Mach. Co.

20 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 5, 1927

Plaintiff relies upon Fire Insurance Co. v. Meyer, 197 U. S. 407 , 25 g. Ct. 483, 49 L. Ed. 810 , and Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16 , 34 S. Ct. 578 , 58 L. Ed. 828 . … Browning v. Waycross, already referred to, and York Manufacturing Co. v. Colley, 247 U. S. 21 , 38 S. Ct. 430 , 62 L. Ed. 963 , 11 A. L.

Triomphe Investors v. City of Northwood

49 F.3d 198 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 1995

Silver v. Franklin Township Board of Zoning Appeals, 966 F.2d at 1036. … Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 194 , 105 S.Ct. 3108, 3120 , 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985); Silver v. Franklin Township Board of Zoning Appeals, 966 F.2d 1031, 1034 (6th Cir.1992).

Diebold v. United States

947 F.2d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 30, 1992

The AFGE, Local 2017 v. Brown Court justified its decision on the basis of this statement as well. … Brown and Local 2855, American Fed'n Govn't Employees v.

Violett v. Reynolds

76 F. App'x 24 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 5, 2003

Curry v. Scott, 249 F.3d 493, 503 (6th Cir.2001). Under § 1997e(a), a prisoner must exhaust all of his available administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action in federal court, see Brown v. … Knuckles El v. Toombs, 215 F.3d 640, 642 (6th Cir.2000); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

Roberson v. TN

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 2005

Brown, BECKER, FLEISHMAN, BROWN & KNIGHT, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Brandy M. Gagliano, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Samuel W. Brown, Arthur F. … Morse v.

Shaw v. United States

75 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 1935

Skinner & Eddy Corporation v. McCarl, 275 U. S. 1, 12 , 48 S. Ct. 12 , 72 L. … Smythe v. United States, 188 U. S. 156, 173 , 23 S. Ct. 279 , 47 L. Ed. 425 . The judgment is affirmed.

Thomas Reichert v. Kellogg Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 16, 2026

Page 28 Watt, et al. v. FedEx Corp., et al. calculated based on any particular set of mortality tables adopted by the [state retirement board].” Lenander v. Wash. … Start with the Pennsylvania trial court’s decision in O’Dea v. Public School Employes’ [sic] Retirement Board, 88 Pa. D. & C. 593 (Ct. C.P. Pa. 1954).

Josephine Goss and Thomas A. Goss, Infants, by Ralph Goss, Their Father and Next Friend v. The Board of Education of the City of Knoxville, Tennessee

305 F.2d 523 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 6, 1962

Goss, Infants, by Ralph Goss, Their Father and Next Friend, et al., Appellants v. The Board of Education of the City of Knoxville, Tennessee, a Body Corporate or Continuous Legal Entity, e/o Dr. John H. … That “the Board of Education will follow the rules and regulations as set forth from time to time by the State Board for Vocational Education.” 6.

United States v. Tyransee A. Harris

192 F.3d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 21, 1999

In support of his claim that Officer Snavely lacked the reasonable suspicion necessary for an investigatory stop, Harris cites Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). … Jones v.

Young v. Green Oak Twnshp

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 28, 2006

Yinger then filed a complaint in federal court against the City, its pension board, and various City employees, alleging state and No. 05-2633 Young v. … Because the Board did not violate Young’s due process rights when it terminated him, Young’s § 1983 claims also fail on the merits. See, e.g., Ewolski v.

Ronald Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 25, 2008

This evidence was established through the testimony of William Brown (“Brown”), a former employee No. 08-5082 Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Serv. … Both Brown and Dossett testified that they witnessed Dana Young, a white employee of CWS, throw firecrackers or similar devices in the smoke hole. According to Brown, Young threw actual firecrackers.

John T. Frazier v. Railroad Retirement Board

7 F.3d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 4, 1993

He requests oral argument and permission to proceed as a pauper. 3 This court has jurisdiction to review a decision of the Board pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 231g. Crenshaw v. United States R.R. … In its review of a Board decision, this court may consult the Social Security Act statutes, regulations, and decisions addressing the issue of disability. Chandler v. United States R.R.

United States v. Willie Joseph Causey, Jr.

834 F.2d 1277 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 25, 1988

In Manson v. … In Smith v.

William Mallory v. George C. Eyrich

839 F.2d 275 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 1988

Thus, in Dougherty County, Georgia, Board of Education v. … It did so largely on the basis of this court’s decision in Gilday v. Board of Elections, 472 F.2d 214 (6th Cir.1972).

Jackson Iron & Steel Co. v. Commissioner

54 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 30, 1931

it did not, the Board of Tax Appeals was without jurisdiction. … So construed, an application of the definition to the present ease discloses no deficiency assessment, and the appeal was properly dismissed by the Board for want of jurisdiction. Cf. Fort Pitt Spring & Mfg. Co. v.

Appalachian Volunteers, Inc. v. Charles Clark, Edward Lee Blankenship v. Clarles Clark

432 F.2d 530 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 11, 1970

presentation of grievances to the Board. … National Mediation Board v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Int’l, 323 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1963); Pan American World Airways v. Flight Eng’rs Int’l Ass’n, 306 F.2d 840 (2d Cir. 1962).

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,895 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Waco Financial, Inc. And J. Jerome Prevatte

751 F.2d 831 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 3, 1985

On appeal by WACO and Prevatte the NASD’s *833 Board of Governors affirmed the decision of the committee. … The same position was set forth in the appellants’ reply brief, where Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 , 97 S.Ct. 980 , 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977), and Johnson v.

Mendoza v. Berghuis

544 F.3d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 15, 2008

See, e.g., Bell v. … See, e.g., United States v.

Kenneth D. Lansing v. City of Memphis Memphis Park Commission, Memphis in May International Festival, Inc.

202 F.3d 821 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 2000

Fifth, the presence of two public officials on the Memphis in May board in this case fails to satisfy the nexus test. In Crowder v. … In Adams v. Vandemark, the court came to a similar conclusion regarding a board one-third of whose members were public officials. 855 F.2d at 317 .