Case law

NLRB v. Palmer Donavin & P-D

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 2004

Broido, NATIONAL LABOR - No. 02-2336 RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. - v. … Serv. of Mobile, Inc., 380 U.S. 255, 256 Thereafter, the Board’s General Counsel issued a complaint (1965) (citation omitted); see also Swallows v.

Int'l Union of Painters & Allied Trades v. Warren Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 31, 2025

However, the Board of Trustees is not a party to this appeal.  No. 24-3282 Int’l Union of Painters & Allied Trades et al. v. Smith et al. … No. 5 v. Hudson Valley Dist. Council Bricklayers & Joint Benefit Funds, 858 F. Supp. 373, 376 (S.D.N.Y. 1994); Levy v. Loc. Union No. 810, 20 F.3d 516, 520 (2d Cir. 1994); Masino v.

Radol v. Thomas

772 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 13, 1985

In Starkman v. … See Jordan v.

PARLAK v. Holder

589 F.3d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 24, 2009

Diaz-Zanatta v. Holder, 558 F.3d 450, 455 (6th Cir.2009) (citing Singh v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 736, 739 (7th Cir.2005), and Castaneda-Castillo v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 17, 20 (1st Cir.2007)); Balachova v. … See, e.g., Callin v.

City of Detroit v. Grummond

216 F. 273 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1914

W. 887 ; Elliott v. Supervisors, 58 Mich. 452 , 25 N. W. 461 , 55 Am. Rep. 706 ; Wilkinson v. Long Rapids, 74 Mich. 64 , 41 N. W. 861 ; Cedar Creek Twp. v. Supervisors, 135 Mich. 124 , 97 N. W. 409 ; Bishop v. … Judge Campbell in Elliott v.

Eastover Mining Co. v. Dorothy S. Williams and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

338 F.3d 501 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 31, 2003

Peabody Coal Co. v. Greer, 62 F.3d 801, 804 (6th Cir.1995) (“This Court has plenary authority to review the Board’s legal conclusions.”) (citing Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Co., 748 F.2d 1112, 1119 (6th Cir.1984)). … Skidmore v.

Armco Steel Corporation v. Ordman

414 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 4, 1969

414 F.2d 259 ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION and Armco Employees Independent Federation, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Arnold ORDMAN, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and John C. … Corp. v.

The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

459 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 1972

Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States, 221 U.S. 1, 66 , 31 S.Ct. 502 , 55 L.Ed. 619 (1911); Chicago Board of Trade v. … They too had transacted business with Brown relating to National Housing Act loans.

Raid Shaba Sako v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General

434 F.3d 857 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 20, 2006

Denko v. INS, 351 F.3d 717, 724 (6th Cir.2003); Huicochea-Gomez v. INS, 237 F.3d 696, 699-700 (6th Cir.2001); Ljucovic v. … Volkova v. Reno, 232 F.3d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir.2000), that circuit appears to be alone in so holding. See Dakane v.

Lincoln Electric Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.

162 F.2d 379 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1947

Rassenfoss v. Com’r, 158 F.2d 764 . Our own conclusion is already of record in Com’r v. … Dunn & McCarthy, Inc. v. Com’r, 2 Cir., 139 F.2d 242 . See also Helvering v. Community Bond & Mortgage Co., 2 Cir., 74 F.2d 727 . The discussion in Welch v.

Vaughn Mitchell v. Duncan MacLaren

933 F.3d 526 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 1, 2019

The disagreement essentially boils down to whether Brown or Mitchell shot Jorden. The jury determined that Mitchell fired a shot 1See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). … No. 17-2444 Mitchell v. MacLaren Page 3 that killed Jorden, and then either Brown or Mitchell shot at Jorden’s body multiple times.

Cartier v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

37 F.2d 894 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 14, 1930

Some testimony was introduced as to the effect of the ease of the United States v. Keystone Watch Case Co. (D. … The evidence does not clearly show a value of this stock above that fixed by the Board. The finding of the Board is accordingly affirmed.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hammel

108 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 10, 1940

, but disallowed by the Board. … The order of the Board is affirmed.

The Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Company v. Evelyn Milliken, Widow of Harold Milliken, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

200 F.3d 942 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 2000

A divided Benefits Review Board reversed, awarding her benefits. The Board considered itself bound by this court's decision in Kyle v. … Y&O filed a memorandum contra to this action of plaintiff indicating a Board decision, Freeman v.

Cappello v. Duncan Aircraft Sales of Florida

79 F.3d 1465 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 1996

All nine people on board were killed. … Coatney v. Berkshire, 500 F.2d 290, 292 (8th Cir.1974). 16 Schuler v. United States, 868 F.2d 195, 197 (6th Cir.1989). 17 A.

United States v. Theatrice Matthews and Derron MacLin

25 F.3d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 24, 1994

Inside were two brick-shaped packages covered in brown shipping tape wrapped with newspaper and mothballs on them. … Matthews signed a consent to search, and boarded the flight without his bag. Drake found $51,000 in cash in the suitcase.

In Re Cook

551 F.3d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 2009

McKune v. … In Ohio, a panel of the Board of Governors on Attorney Discipline makes findings of fact and conclusions of law that are then considered by the full Board. See Ohio Gov. Bar Rule V § 6(G)-(K).

Donoho v. Smith County Bd. of Educ.

21 F. App'x 293 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 2001

She also contacted the Smith County Board of Education (the “Board”) but the Board told her it did not need to take action at this stage of her complaint. … Covington v. Knox County Sch. Sys., 205 F.3d 912 , 915 (6th Cir.2000); see also Honig v.

Scott v. Harris Automatic Press Co.

284 F. 778 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 7, 1922

Grinnel v. Johnson, 247 U. S. 426 , 38 Sup. Ct. 547, 62 L. Ed. 1196 ; Richards v. Chase Elevator Co., 158 U. S. 299, 302 , 15 Sup. Ct. 831, 39 L. Ed. 991 ; Union Co. v. Keith, 139 U. S. 530 , 11 Sup. Ct. 621, 35 L. … Ed. 261 ; Fond du Lac v. May, 137 U. S. 395 , 11 Sup. Ct. 98, 34 L. Ed. 714 , and cases there cited; Hailes v. Van Wormer, 87 U. S. (20 Wall.) 353 , 22 L. Ed. 241 ; Gas Machinery Co. v.

Harry Hoy and Michael R. Schuster v. Progress Pattern Company

217 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 1954

Dwyer v. Tracey, D.C. N.D.Ill., 10 F.R.D. 115 ; Pittston-Luzerne Corp. v. United States, D.C.M.D.Pa., 84 F.Supp. 800 ; Eberle v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co., D.C.E.D.Okl., 35 F.Supp. 296 . … Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph Corp., 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 580 ; Chappell v.