Case law

United States v. Andy Kenneth Miller, Jr.

870 F.2d 1067 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 20, 1989

Defendant relies upon Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977), wherein the Supreme Court held that “courts may not impose more than one punishment for the same offense....” … Brown, 432 U.S. at 166 , 97 S.Ct. at 2226 (emphasis supplied).

United States v. Charlie Lee Hart

449 F.2d 340 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 1971

at all practicable, be residents of the area in which their local board has jurisdiction.” 1 Appellant urges that our opinion in United States v. … We did not, however, overrule United States v. Brooks, 415 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1969).

Gall v. Scroggy

603 F.3d 346 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 29, 2010

Gall v. … Lane v.

James v. Lynch

627 F. App'x 511 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 2, 2015

Bi Feng Liu v. Holder, 560 F.3d 485, 489 (6th Cir.2009). … rational explanation, inexplicably departed from established policies, or rested on an impermissible basis such as invidious discrimination against a particular race or group.’ ” Bi Feng Liu, 560 F.3d at 490 (quoting Allabani v.

Usama J. Hamama v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

78 F.3d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 1996

In United States v. … In Gonzalez v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wooster Brush Co. Employees Relief Ass'n

727 F.2d 566 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 8, 1984

board of directors. … See Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 438-39 , 96 S.Ct. 2697, 2706 , 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976). The word “discriminating,” like the word “monopolizing” in Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v.

United States v. Paul Lamonge, (Two Cases)

458 F.2d 197 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1972

See Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41, 57, 59-60 , 87 S.Ct. 1873 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1040 (1967). … Browne, may have had with reference to a wire tap are matters which are of no concern to this jury.

Kobell v. United Paperworkers International Union

965 F.2d 1401 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 1992

For such cases, Congress has provided the Board with the ability to petition the district court to enjoin allegedly unfair labor practices pending the Board’s substantive review of those practices. See Arlook v. S. … Dilatory or evasive tactics have been considered by the Board as indicative of bad faith. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v.

Cornel Viorel Scorteanu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

339 F.3d 407 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 2003

See Dobrota v. … Moreover, the Board need not “list every possible positive and negative factor in its decision.” Rodriguez-Rivera v. INS, 993 F.2d 169, 170-71 (8th Cir.1993).

Robert F. Verville, and John G. Debruyn v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Robert F. Verville, and John G. Debruyn, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Defendants-Cross-Appellees

520 F.2d 615 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 5, 1975

An airline System Board of Adjustment does not have jurisdiction of a dispute between a union and a union member. Brady v. … that the Board realized that its award implicitly covered questions of union discipline 3 See Morton Salt Co. v.

Michael v. Ghee

498 F.3d 372 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 10, 2007

Although Swihart’s due process challenge to the procedures used by the parole board is cognizable under § 1983 pursuant to Wilkinson v. … Pri- or to 1987, no guidelines were issued to guide the parole board’s discretion in making sentencing determinations. In 1987, the parole board adopted guidelines to assist it in exercising its discretion. See State v.

United States v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 17, 2007

See United States v. … Chance is distinguished from United States v. Brown, 959 F.2d 63 (6th Cir. 1992), where the de minimis interstate commerce connection was established.

Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. FORTNEY OIL CO., ETC.

125 F.2d 995 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 7, 1942

The Board in each case decided that respondents were not taxable as associations. … The Board in holding that a mere agency relationship was created between the assignors and their assignees relied upon decisions involving Texas leases, and also upon Jaenicke v.

United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Local 3047 v. Hardin County

842 F.3d 407 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 18, 2016

Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 65 , 128 S.Ct. 2408 , 171 L.Ed.2d 264 (2008) (quoting Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles, 475 U.S. 608, 613 , 106 S.Ct. 1395 , 89 L.Ed.2d 616 (1986)). … In Simms v.

Fuller v. Branch County Road Commission

520 F.2d 307 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 23, 1975

E. g., Public Service Commission v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc., 306 U.S. 204 , 59 S.Ct. 480 , 83 L.Ed. 806 (1939), Pacific R.R. v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289 , 25 L.Ed. 932 (1889). … in the process as the “board of county road commissioners of the county of ...” and any judgment obtained thereon against such board of county road commissioners shall be audited and paid from the county road fund as are

Jelkovski v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

103 F. App'x 578 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 2004

The Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirmed the IJ’s decision without opinion. … However, they failed to properly submit these claims to the Board, as they did not inform former counsel of their claims, or indicate that complaints had been filed with the bar association. Stewart v. U.S.

Ralston Steel Car Co. v. Commissioner

53 F.2d 948 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 3, 1931

La Belle Iron Works v. U. S., 256 U. S. 377 , 41 S. Ct. 528 , 65 L. Ed. 998 . … Willcuts v. Milton Dairy Co., supra. Compare United States v. Ludey, 274 U. S. 295 , 47 S. Ct. 608 , 71 L. Ed. 1054 .

John C. Singleton v. Lewis B. Stevens, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Milan, Michigan, United States Board of Parole

306 F.2d 513 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 22, 1962

Fleming v. Tate, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 156 F.2d 848 (1946); Hurley v. Reed, supra; Robbins v. Reed, supra; Moore v. Reid, supra; Barnes v. Reed, 301 F.2d 516 (C.A.D.C., 1962). … Because of various court decisions, the United States Parole Board now provides by rule that: “All federal prisoners who have been returned to custody as parole or mandatory release violators under a Board war- *514 rant

Serrano v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.

790 F.2d 1279 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 8, 1986

In Engineers v. … In Belknap, Inc. v.

Williams v. Bass

63 F.3d 483 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 1995

Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 466 , 103 S.Ct. 864, 868-69 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983). 7 The board's sanction was to terminate Williams' minimum security status. … Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 , 103 S.Ct. 1741 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 , 103 S.Ct. 864 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); Meachum v.