Case law

Midland Insurance v. Adam

781 F.2d 526 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1985

Rather, such proceedings ended when no appeal was filed with the Board following the AU’s decision on remand. Moreover, in Blevins v. … See also Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. Benefits Review Board, 535 F.2d 758 (3d Cir.1976).

Lieutenant General W. G. Wyman, Commanding Officer of the Sixth Army, Presidio of San Francisco, California v. Russell Louis La Rose

223 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1955

granted, all of which constituted a denial of due process of law (Knox v. … United States v. Vincelli, 2 Cir., 215 F.2d 210 . 18 . See 32 C.F.B.. § 1625.2. 19 . See 32 C.FJEt. §§ 1624.2 and 1625.13. 20 . Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 203 F.2d 85 ; Skinner v.

STATE of Michigan, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent-Appellee

744 F.2d 32 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1984

Department of Health and Human Services, 708 F.2d 627 (11th Cir.1983); Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Departmental Grant Appeals Board, 698 F.2d 22 (1st Cir.1983); and State of New Jersey v. … Justice Powell in Schweiker v.

Greene v. City of Memphis

610 F.2d 395 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 1979

Thus we take note of plaintiff’s reliance upon Arlington County Board v. … They have been made to attend segregated and inferior schools, e. g., Brown v.

Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. HF NEIGHBORS R. CO.

81 F.2d 173 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 14, 1936

We see nothing in the Senior v. … The Board allowed the depreciation. We think it was right, and that the case of Weiss v. Wiener, 279 U.S. 333 , 49 S.Ct. 337 , 73 L.Ed. 720 , does not here apply. See, also, Cogar v.

Shamrock Coal Co. v. Lee

751 F.2d 187 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 4, 1985

At oral argument, counsel for the Board stated that the Board has stopped using the “reasonable opportunity to be hired” test since Central Appalachian Coal Co. v. Fletcher, 679 F.2d 1086 (4th Cir.1982). … See Central Appalachian Coal Co. v.

Portage Silica Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

89 F.2d 958 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1937

Upon our consideration of the prior case it was our duty to accept the fact findings of the Board as conclusive [Phillips v. Com’r, 283 U.S. 589 , 600, 51 S.Ct. 608 , 612, 75 L.Ed. 1289 ; Tracy v. … of the last excepting clause of section 283 (b) of the act of 1926 ( 44 Stat. 63 ), petitioner had, until the decision of the Board, the right to pay the tax and sue for a refund (Old Colony Trust Co. v.

Andrews v. Drake

83 F.2d 767 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 8, 1936

It is not primarily a contest between rival boards of directors. The court undoubtedly had jurisdiction (Mayer v. … Co. et al. v. Boggiano, 202 Ill. 312 , 67 N.E. 17 ; Hall v. Woods, 325 Ill. 114, 136 , 156 N.E. 258 ; Nathan v. Tompkins, 82 Ala. 437, 447 , 2 So. 747 .

Yayeshwork Abay and Burhan Amare v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General and Immigration and Naturalization Service

368 F.3d 634 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 19, 2004

Mikhailevitch v. INS, 146 F.3d 384, 389 (6th Cir.1998); Perkovic v. INS, 33 F.3d 615, 620 (6th Cir.1994). … We may not reverse the Board’s determination simply because we would have decided the matter differently. See Klawitter v. INS, 970 F.2d 149, 151-52 (6th Cir.1992).

Kizer v. SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT

649 F.3d 462 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 17, 2011

Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 (1985) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)). … They suggest that Lewis and the Board employed a “policy No. 10-5161 Kizer, et al. v. Shelby County Gov’t, et al.

National Labor Relations Board v. Seminole Intermodal Transport, Inc.

94 F.3d 645 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SEMINOLE INTERMODAL TRANSPORT, INC., Respondent. No. 96-6304. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 18, 1996. Before: BROWN, JONES, and BOGGS, Circuit Judges. … ORDER 1 This cause is submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for summary entry of a judgment against Respondent, Seminole Intermodal Transport, Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns

Kindred Nursing Centers East v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 2013

As the Court observed more recently, a court is “not authorized to bind Nos. 12-1027/1174 Kindred Nursing v. N.L.R.B. Page 11 the Board in ways not mandated by Congress.” NLRB v. … Moreover, as the Board explained in Specialty Healthcare II, not only has the Board used this test before, but the District of Columbia Circuit approved of the Board’s use of it in Blue Man Vegas, LLC v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Morgan Artcraft Screenprint, Inc.

95 F.3d 1152 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 21, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MORGAN ARTCRAFT SCREENPRINT, INC., Respondent. No. 96-5836. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 21, 1996. National Labor Relations Board, No. 7-CA-36281. … The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint and has not made an appearance either before the Board or this court. Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought.

Nationwide Recovery, Inc. v. City of Detroit, Mich.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 2026

Beginning with the motion to strike, the court held that Parish’s statements about the probable conduct of the Board came from his “personal experience and knowledge.” Nationwide Recovery, Inc. v. … See Zinermon v.

United States v. James P. Fitch

964 F.2d 571 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 20, 1992

United States v. Pelletier, 898 F.2d 297, 301 (2nd Cir.1990). An agreement not to prosecute is contractual in nature, and subject to contract law standards. United States v. Brown, 801 F.2d 352, 354 (8th Cir.1986). … Brown, 801 F.2d at 355 .

Jun E. Pak v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Doris Meissner, Commissioner of Ins Immigration and Naturalization Service Department of Justice Robert Brown, District Ohio Director, Ins

196 F.3d 666 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 1999

Janet Reno, Attorney General; Doris Meissner, Commissioner of INS; Immigration and Naturalization Service; Department of Justice; Robert Brown, District Ohio Director, INS, Respondents-Appellants. … Accardi v.

GUERNSEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

996 F.2d 830 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 1993

Fort Worth Osteopathic Medical Ctr. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Assn., Board Dec.No. 90-0543. … See HCA Health Services of Midwest, Inc. v. Bowen, 869 F.2d 1179 , 1181 n. 3 (9th Cir.1989). The Accounting Principles Board issued APB Opinion 26, titled "Early Extinguishment of Debt," in 1972.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Ohio Beef Corporation

91 F.3d 144 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 28, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The OHIO BEEF CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 95-5430. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 28, 1996. Before: WELLFORD, NELSON, and RYAN, Circuit Judges. … NLRB v. The Ohio Beef Corporation, No. 95-5430, 1995 WL 353546 (6th Cir.

Richard A. Sullivan v. River Valley School District, and Charles O. Williams, Superintendent, Individually and in His Official Capacity

197 F.3d 804 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 29, 1999

See also Kvintus v. R.L. … See Wathen v.

Brandon Fox v. Ronald Desoto, Louisville Regional Airport Authority

489 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2007

He boarded the airplane and had not yet been introduced to the captain and crew as is required by regulation, when he got into a verbal exchange with a female passenger and her flaneé. … City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 389 , 109 S.Ct. 1197 , 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989); Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 411 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).