Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. The Ohio Beef Corporation

91 F.3d 144 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 28, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The OHIO BEEF CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 95-5430. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 28, 1996. Before: WELLFORD, NELSON, and RYAN, Circuit Judges. … NLRB v. The Ohio Beef Corporation, No. 95-5430, 1995 WL 353546 (6th Cir.

Shaker Medical Center Hospital v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

686 F.2d 1203 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 1, 1982

Shaker objected to the decision of the Intermediary and filed a request for a hearing before the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (the Board). After a hearing the Board upheld the Intermediary decision. … See, e.g., Goleta Valley Community Hospital v. Schweiker, 647 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1981); Medical Center of Independence v. Harris, 628 F.2d 1113 (8th Cir. 1980); Pasadena Hospital Ass’n v.

Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Company v. Milliken

866 F.2d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 1989

We must now determine whether the Board's action was proper. 11 As synopsized in Mullins Coal Co. v. … Director, OWCP v.

Daniel Francei Gumbol v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

815 F.2d 406 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 2, 1987

See Cardoza-Fonseca v. … See also Farzad v. INS, 802 F.2d 123, 125 (5th Cir.1986). FIRMED. For the foregoing reasons, the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is AF- 1 . Compare Sankar v. INS, 757 F.2d 532 (3rd.

Hrynczyn v. Mitchell

21 F. App'x 299 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 2001

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … See Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

Baker v. Kentucky State University

45 F. App'x 328 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 2, 2002

Wymer v. JH Props., Inc., 50 S.W.3d 195, 198 (Ky.2001). In Shah v. Am. … See Noel v. Elk Brand Mfg.

Muambo Martin Luther Kabongo (86-4078), Mesu Kabongo (86-4079) v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

837 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 9, 1988

The decision which is reviewed is that of the Board rather than the IJ’s. Hernandez-Robledo v. INS, 777 F.2d 536, 539 (9th Cir.1985). … Yet, when the Board rendered its decision, the convictions were final. 10 Cf. Quintanilla-Ticas v.

Huscoal, Inc. v. OWCP

48 F.4th 480 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 7, 2022

Huscoal then appealed to the Board. 2. The Board affirmed the ALJ’s award of benefits In September 2021, the Board affirmed the award of benefits in a 2-1 decision. … The dissenting Board member disagreed that Dr.

National Labor Relations Board v. Taylor MacHine Products, Inc.

89 F.3d 834 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TAYLOR MACHINE PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent. No. 96-5304. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 25, 1996. Before: ENGEL, MILBURN, and BOGGS, Circuit Judges. … , Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, on February 16, 1996, in a proceeding before the Board numbered 9-CA-32338. 2 Upon consideration, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the said order of the Board be, and

Anderson v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers

370 F.3d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 2004

could have eliminated the § 501 problem by amending Brown-Graves Co. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest UPGWA’s constitution. We reject this argument. … See Meyers v.

Clifton Smith v. City of Detroit, Mich.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 2, 2024

In an analogous case, the Supreme Court held that a parole board’s release of an individual who committed murder while on parole did not violate the Due Process Clause because “the parole board was not aware that [the] … This Court similarly found no substantive due process violation by state parole board members when a parolee killed someone because the decedent was “simply a member of the public at large.” Janan v.

United States v. Edward Douglas Rose

424 F.2d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 1970

Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 , 82 S.Ct. 1038 , 8 L.Ed.2d 240 (1962); Smith v. United States, 360 U.S. 1 , 79 S.Ct. 991 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1959); Dye v. … Whether the action of the local board was a result of prejudice *1053 or discrimination was a question for the jury. Imboden v.

Curtis Lynne Brown v. George W. Wilson

774 F.2d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 27, 1985

Curtis Lynne Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George W. Wilson, Defendant-Appellee. No. 84-5020 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. 9/27/85 1 W.D.Ky. … Foman v.

William Rafferty Sharman Simon Robert Kuti Daniel Mikus David Bernat Cynthia Dellick v. City of Youngstown

54 F.3d 278 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 23, 1995

ElectroMechanical Corp. v. Ogan, 9 F.3d 445 (6th Cir.1993); Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304 (6th Cir.1989); Hand v. Central Transport, Inc., 779 F.2d 8 (6th Cir.1985). … Yonkers Board of Education, 902 F.2d 213, 218 (2nd Cir.1990).

McKinley Brown v. Herman C. Davis, Warden

787 F.2d 588 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1986

McKINLEY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HERMAN C. DAVIS, WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee. 84-5496 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. 3/5/86 AFFIRMED 1 W.D.Tenn. … Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (1973).

National Labor Relations Board v. Tom Ryan Distributors, Inc.

70 F.3d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 28, 1995

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Petitioner, v. TOM RYAN DISTRIBUTORS, INC. Respondent. No. 95-6316. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 28, 1995. Before: CONTIE, MILBURN, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. … JUDGMENT 1 On July 28, 1994, the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") issued a decision and order in Board Case Nos. 7-CA-33776 and 7-CA-34342 finding the respondent had committed unfair labor practices and directing

Stephen Graham and Brett Lohrke v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, University of Louisville, Robert Weber, and Bill Olson

804 F.2d 953 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1986

NCAA, 570 F.2d 320 , 321-22 (10th Cir.1978); Parish v. NCAA, 506 F.2d 1028, 1034 (5th Cir.1975). 3 . Due to a change in the University’s status, our previous finding in Brown v. … At the time Brown was decided, the University was a municipal university. Now, however, it is a state university pursuant to Ky.Rev. Stat. § 164.810.

Joseph W. Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

64 F.3d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 18, 1995

The court will address only the issues raised in Brown's objections to the magistrate judge's report as these claims are the only issues properly preserved for appellate review. See Mira v. … The ALJ's articulation of the evidence was sufficient to establish that the ALJ considered Brown's impairments in combination. See Gooch v.

Niznik v. United States. Comodor v. United States

184 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1950

Niznik v. United States (Comodor v. United States), 173 F.2d 328 . … The classification of the local board, accordingly, was invalid, - and its action void. The judgments are, therefore, reversed, the convictions are set aside, and appellants are discharged.

Demetrius McClendon v. Terry Sherman, Warden

329 F.3d 490 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 2003

In Austin v. … Moreover, even in pointing to Austin , McClendon gives himself too much license: we actually announced the one-year grace period on August 5, 1999, in Brown v.