Case law

Youghiogheny and Ohio Coal Company v. Milliken

866 F.2d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 1989

We must now determine whether the Board's action was proper. 11 As synopsized in Mullins Coal Co. v. … Director, OWCP v.

Muambo Martin Luther Kabongo (86-4078), Mesu Kabongo (86-4079) v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

837 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 9, 1988

The decision which is reviewed is that of the Board rather than the IJ’s. Hernandez-Robledo v. INS, 777 F.2d 536, 539 (9th Cir.1985). … Yet, when the Board rendered its decision, the convictions were final. 10 Cf. Quintanilla-Ticas v.

Manuel Guzman-Vazquez v. William P. Barr

959 F.3d 253 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 18, 2020

“[T]he Board’s denial of relief may be affirmed only on the basis articulated in the decision and this Court may not assume that the Board considered factors that it failed to mention in its opinion.” Daneshvar v. … The Board agreed.

GUERNSEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

996 F.2d 830 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 18, 1993

Fort Worth Osteopathic Medical Ctr. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Assn., Board Dec.No. 90-0543. … See HCA Health Services of Midwest, Inc. v. Bowen, 869 F.2d 1179 , 1181 n. 3 (9th Cir.1989). The Accounting Principles Board issued APB Opinion 26, titled "Early Extinguishment of Debt," in 1972.

Curtis Board v. John Rees

811 F.2d 603 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1986

Curtis BOARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John REES, Respondent-Appellee. No. 86-5271. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 3, 1986.

United States v. Allen Royce Weatherspoon

82 F.3d 697 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 29, 1996

But the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983), teaches that it was not unconstitutional for the officer to look inside. … As the plurality said in Brown , “The general public could peer into the interior of Brown’s automobile from any of numerous angles; there is no reason [the officer] should be precluded from observing as an officer what would

Wilson v. Bredesen

113 F. App'x 70 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 2004

Tennessee, 215 F.3d 608, 611 (6th Cir.2000) (quoting Wright v. … State v. Robinson, 29 S.W.3d 476, 480 (Tenn.2000).

Lieutenant General W. G. Wyman, Commanding Officer of the Sixth Army, Presidio of San Francisco, California v. Russell Louis La Rose

223 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 1955

granted, all of which constituted a denial of due process of law (Knox v. … United States v. Vincelli, 2 Cir., 215 F.2d 210 . 18 . See 32 C.F.B.. § 1625.2. 19 . See 32 C.FJEt. §§ 1624.2 and 1625.13. 20 . Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 203 F.2d 85 ; Skinner v.

Michael Jackson v. C. R. Dorrier

424 F.2d 213 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1970

The students here involved were accorded an adequate hearing before school authorities and the Board of Education and a thorough evidentiary hearing before the District Judge. In Epperson v. … In Tinker v.

Ralph E. Kelly v. Ishmon F. Burks, Jr.

415 F.3d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 20, 2005

Sevier v. Turner, 742 F.2d 262, 273 (6th Cir.1984) (citations omitted). … The district court’s reliance on Kessler v. Board of Regents, 738 F.2d 751 (6th Cir.1984), is therefore misplaced.

Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States

473 F.3d 253 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 4, 2007

See, e.g., Newport *268 News Shipbldg. & Dry Dock Co. v. Brown, 376 F.3d 245 , 250 (4th Cir.2004); Hunt v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, 999 F.2d 419, 424 (9th Cir.1993); Oilfield Safety & Mach. … Co. v.

Kindred Nursing Centers East v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 2013

As the Court observed more recently, a court is “not authorized to bind Nos. 12-1027/1174 Kindred Nursing v. N.L.R.B. Page 11 the Board in ways not mandated by Congress.” NLRB v. … Moreover, as the Board explained in Specialty Healthcare II, not only has the Board used this test before, but the District of Columbia Circuit approved of the Board’s use of it in Blue Man Vegas, LLC v.

United States v. Anthony Board, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 4, 2018

Board’s counsel 1 Board did not have a plea agreement. -2- No. 17-4286, United States v. … See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732-33 (1993); see also United States v.

American Federation of Radio & Television Artists v. Getreu

258 F.2d 698 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 5, 1958

Resolution of the actual merits of the controversy is left for administrative determination by the Board, subject to subsequent review here in the event enforcement is sought. Schauffler v. … “This Court cannot, and should not try to, usurp the function and duty of the Board. Nor should it endeavor to speculate on the law or facts which may eventually underlie the Board’s decision.” Douds v.

Browning v. Sims

816 F.2d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 1987

816 F.2d 678 Browning v. Sims 86-5162 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. 4/8/87 1 W.D.Ky. AFFIRMED

Greene v. City of Memphis

610 F.2d 395 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 1979

Thus we take note of plaintiff’s reliance upon Arlington County Board v. … They have been made to attend segregated and inferior schools, e. g., Brown v.

Hunter v. City of Chattanooga

50 F. App'x 239 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 31, 2002

Holloway v. Brush, 220 F.3d 767, 772 (6th Cir.2000). … Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978); Stemler v. City of Florence, 126 F.3d 856, 865 (6th Cir.1997).

United Food & Commercial Workers v. Kroger Co.

51 F.4th 197 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 14, 2022

The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) administers the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (the “NLRA”). See 29 U.S.C. § 153. … So, at this point, any conflict between the arbitrator’s decision and the Board’s jurisdiction is speculative. Cf. United Food & Com. Workers Union, Loc. 400 v.

Crowell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

62 F.2d 51 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1932

Ed. 385 ; Duffin v. Lucas, 55 F.(2d) 786, 791 (C. C. A. 6). We come then to the remaining question in the case. Was the evidence before the board such that it was i*equired to hold! … Tracy v. Commissioner, supra.

Hugh Burnett v. Stanley McNabb

565 F.2d 398 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 4, 1977

Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 322 , 95 S.Ct. 922 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975); Wolfel v. Sanborn, 555 F.2d 583 (6th Cir. 1977); Nelson v. Fox, 256 F.2d 312 (6th Cir. 1958). … Bates v. Dause, 502 F.2d 865, 867 (6th Cir. 1974). This is “yet another effort to make a federal question out of litigation where exclusive jurisdiction is in the State Courts.” Ohio Inns, Inc. v.