Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

1.04s

  • Leonid Petkiewytsch v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

    945 F.2d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 1991

    While German nationals were not immune from labor education camp imprisonment for genuine labor violations, the record clearly demonstrates that the “infractions” resulting in labor education camp imprisonment were predominantly … Nevertheless, his personal participation in the persecution of civilians was clearly established.

    Disagreed with by Szehinskyj v. Attorney General of the United States, 432 F.3d 253 (2005)Cited 20 timesPublished
  • James Price v. Bd of Trustees of the Ind. Laborer's Pension Fund

    632 F.3d 288 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 12, 2011

    Section 15.1 of the Plan clearly gives the Board authority to amend the Plan. … Plan and on the particular qualifying participant.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Victor Turner v. Margaret Bagley

    401 F.3d 718 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 2005

    The magistrate judge concluded that the right to a speedy appeal has not been established by a decision of the Supreme Court. … While this court has not endorsed this procedure, Turner has certainly been free to bring an action under § 1983, subject to defenses of absolute or qualified immunity, seeking redress from the appropriate defendants.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • United States v. Real Property 10338 Marcy Rd. N.W.

    938 F.3d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 12, 2019

    The court clearly erred by including the Taurus as an unrebutted expense. … The court clearly erred by including the $6,875 van purchase as an unrebutted expense.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Timothy E. Feeney v. Charles Shipley State of Ohio Ohio Department of Public Safety

    164 F.3d 311 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1999

    Political patronage is a well-established feature of American politics. … In the proceedings below, the district court also held that it would grant the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis that Director Shipley was entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jordie Callahan

    801 F.3d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 8, 2015

    B.E. was not immune from abuse—one of Hunt’s sons tied her up with rope and kept her bound all night because she tried to drink a soda that was not intended for her. Defendants also beat B.E. themselves. … In this case, Hunt used a fence post to beat S.E., which qualifies as a dangerous weapon under the circumstances.

    Cited 81 timesPublished
  • Taxpayers United for Assessment Cuts v. Richard H. Austin, Citizens for Education Ballot Question Committee, Intervening

    994 F.2d 291 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1993

    . § 1343 (a)(3), which gives the federal courts jurisdiction over civil actions claiming deprivation of “any right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (a)(3) (1988). … However, the classifications established by defendants’ construction of § 12-5-175(a) do not involve such suspect classifications.

    Cited 128 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 80, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Afl-Cio

    491 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 1974

    and refusing to comply with this Court’s said consent decree, and that Local 80 will undertake forthwith the action ordered in purgation, said notices, together with a copy of the contempt adjudication to be maintained in clearly … As shown in the subsidiary findings below, and in accordance with the Court’s statement at the conclusion of the hearing, that the admissions of Respondent’s witness Styles, established “that there was discrimination” (Tr

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, Local 14398, and United Steelworkers of America

    245 F.3d 601 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 2001

    The arbitrator, in fact, clearly acknowledged that he could not add to, subtract from, or modify the agreement. … Indeed, additional articles of the CBA establish that the hospital does not have the unfettered right to hire or fire its employees.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Mayson Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    178 F.2d 115 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 17, 1949

    Wurl felt that the Company would prosper more if a bonus system was established. … These three officers were experienced, highly qualified and able executives.

    Cited 215 timesPublished
  • United States v. Lisa Gort-Didonato

    109 F.3d 318 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 1997

    To apply the § 3B1.1 enhancement, the government must establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, the elements of § 3B1.1. See United States v. Ledezma, 26 F.3d 636, 644 (6th Cir.1994). … That amendment, which is now articulated in Application Note 2 of the Commentary to § 3B1.1, provides: To qualify for an adjustment under this section, the defendant must have been the organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • Daisy B. Scott v. State of Tennessee

    878 F.2d 382 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 3, 1989

    In addition, Scott contends that due to her reassignment, several less qualified and less experienced white employees now hold positions superior to her own and, as a result, will enjoy greater opportunities for salary advancement … The court then held that the Eleventh Amendment bars Scott, as a matter of sovereign immunity, from instituting a civil action in federal court against the State of Tennessee or its agencies.

    Cited 125 timesUnpublished
  • Richards v. Carpenter

    261 F. 724 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 5, 1919

    We express no opinion as to the earlier act, but we think that this section 554 so definitely deals with the liability sought to be enforced that upon the principles heretofore established it must be taken to affect its substance … What is said about the superintendent’s right to sue is perhaps a dictum, but his right to maintain such an action is clearly recognized ( 208 N. Y. 529 , 101 N.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fruehauf Corporation, William E. Grace and Robert D. Rowan v. Internal Revenue Service

    566 F.2d 574 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 1977

    In addition, § 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code was extensively amended by § 1202(a) of the TRA, effective January 1, 1977, to establish the general rule that “returns and return information shall be confidential” and not … No. 94-409, 90 Stat. 1241, 1247, which was effective March 13, 1977. 5 While this amendment narrowed the exemption, we conclude that revised § 6103 does qualify as an exemption three statute, entitling the Internal Revenue

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • S.H.A.R.K. v. Metro Parks Serving

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 2007

    Although the Supreme Court has established general principles with respect to access claims, what is missing from these cases is a clearly defined framework in which to analyze these claims.2 We find D’Amario, 639 F. … We conclude that neither DeNicola or White Buffalo qualify as state actors under any of the state-action formulations.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wayne Jaggers v. City of Alexandria Alexandria

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 2, 2009

    Under the collateral-order doctrine, however, an “order denying a motion to dismiss a complaint against a[n] . . . official when the dismissal motion is based on the official’s assertion of absolute or qualified immunity … Therefore, the burden rests on the Council Members “to establish the existence of absolute legislative immunity.” Canary v. Osborn, 211 F.3d 324, 328 (6th Cir. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Directory Sales Management Corporation v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company American Information Technologies Corporation and Ameritech Publishing, Inc.

    833 F.2d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 18, 1987

    The PSC, which is a contract between Ohio Bell and API, both subsidiaries of Ameritech, did not qualify because under Copperweld Corp. v. … We agree with the District Court that it probably does not qualify as a contract, combination or conspiracy for the purposes of section 1.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Edward J. Brennan v. Beverly Griffeth Robert A. Mossing, U.S. Government

    803 F.2d 718 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 23, 1986

    Even if the individual defendants are not entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity, the district court was correct to hold that they are entitled to a qualified immunity in this case because their actions did not violate … any clearly established statutory or constitutional right of which a reasonable person would have known.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Railway Exp. Agency, Inc. v. Clark

    194 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 5, 1952

    If that failed to establish the condition, Dr. Kasselberg’s evidence fails completely. … Neither qualified as a specialist but both testified that the death might have been caused accidentally.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,908 Alexander MacDonald (95-6028/6286) v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant (95-6030/6287)

    110 F.3d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 1997

    I would hold that the federal standards on brake performance were clearly met by the defendant, and that plaintiffs failed to meet or establish proof sufficient to overcome General Motors’ showing. … One wonders where he would *351 have established domicile after graduation from the University of Kansas.

    Cited 118 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.