Case law

Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. COMMISSIONER OF I. REVENUE

51 F.2d 78 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1931

V. Board v. Commissioner, 51 F.(2d) 73 , this day delivered, and the order of the Board of Tax Appeals upon this issue is reversed upon the authority of that decision. … Duffln, and V. J.

Black Motor Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

125 F.2d 977 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 1942

The fact that the issue was not raised in the petition to the Board is immaterial and, under the circumstances here present, we have jurisdiction of the issue. Scripps v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 492 ; Hormel v. … Prime Securities Corporation v. United States, 6 Cir., 119 F.2d 939 . Decision of the Board is affirmed.

Jose Luna-Benalcazar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

414 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 31, 1969

No appeal was taken to the Board of Immigration Appeals. … Novinc v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 371 F.2d 272 (7th Cir. 1967); Chul Hi Kim v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 357 F.2d 904 (7th Cir. 1966); Bregman v.

William Wise Robinson v. James E. Dow and Philip M. Swatek

522 F.2d 855 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 23, 1975

Air East, Inc. v. NTSB, 512 F.2d 1227 (3rd Cir., 1975). … Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbldg. Corp., 303 U.S. 41 , 48-50, 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 (1938); Kesinger v. Universal Airlines, Inc., 474 F.2d 1127, 1131 (6th Cir. 1973); Oling v.

Ex parte Thieret

268 F. 472 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 3, 1920

Cas. 1918B, 856; Franke v. Murray (C. C. A. 8) 248 Fed. 865, 867, 868 , 160 C. C. A. 623 , L. R. A. 1918E, 1015, Ann. Cas. 1918D, 98; Angelus v. Sullivan (C. C. A. 2) 246 Fed. 54, 60 , 158 C. C. A. 280 . … Franke v. Murray, supra, 248 Fed. 865, 869 , 160 C. C. A. 623 , L. R. A. 1918E, 1015, Ann. Cas. 1918D, 98; Napore v. Rowe (C. C. A. 9) 256 Fed. 832, 834 , 168 C. C. A. 178 ; Arbitman v. Woodside (C. C.

United States v. Roberto Roper

25 F.3d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1994

Brown spoke to Caradine and then to a woman at an insurance company. Brown and Roper then went to the insurance company before going to the dealership to pick up the truck. … At the dealership, Brown signed all the necessary papers while Roper paid the salesman more cash. Roper drove the Pathfinder home and Brown drove the Maxima.

Samira G. Hana v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General

400 F.3d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 14, 2005

Under this deferential standard, we may not reverse the Board simply because we disagree with its understanding of the facts. Koliada v. INS, 259 F.3d 482, 486 (6th Cir.2001). … Rather, we must find that the evidence compels a finding that the Board was wrong. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

United States v. Edward Stulga

584 F.2d 142 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 1978

In Graves v. … Judge Brown did not choose to voluntarily withdraw and overruled the motion. No prejudice is shown and we do not find any abuse of discretion on the part of Judge Brown. Affirmed. 1 .

Marshall Clark v. Lewis B. Stevens, Warden

291 F.2d 388 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 1961

Christianson v. Zerbst, 10 Cir., 89 F.2d 40 ; Freedman v. Looney, 10 Cir., 210 F.2d 56, 57 . The appellant left his home State of residence and failed to report to the Board of Parole, as required by law. … This occasioned the Board’s revocation of his parole; and there is certainly no abuse of discretion by the Board.

Marvin Stone v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

13 F.3d 934 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1994

Foti v. … The narrow holding of Giova v.

Daniel Newman v. Hamburg Township

773 F.3d 769 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 12, 2014

A witness, Ben Masters, said that he saw two young men with light brown hair drive by Chappelear’s home in a car much like Gary Kulpa’s not long before the murder. … Brown human hair in the bag was similar in color to Newman’s hair, and reddish animal fur in the bag was similar to the color of the fur of one of Newman’s dogs.

Kales v. Commissioner

101 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 12, 1939

In Foss v. … Croker v. Commissioner, 27 B.T.A. 588 , cited by the dissenting Board member.

Cherokee Motor C. Co. v. Com'r of Internal Revenue

135 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 1943

Under such circumstances, the decision of the Board on this point should be affirmed. General Utilities & Operating Company v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200, 206 , 56 S.Ct. 185 , 80 L.Ed. 154 ; Helvering v. … Pinellas Ice Company v. Commissioner, 287 U.S. 462, 469 , 53 S.Ct. 257 , 77 L.Ed. 428 ; Wolfson v. Reinecke, 7 Cir., 72 F.2d 59 . The orders of the Board are affirmed.

United States v. Peter Hanlon Irons

369 F.2d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 1966

On July 27, 1961, appellant was classified 1-A by local board 55, and was notified by the board on August 14, 1961 of his 1-A classification, but intentionally failed to appeal. *558 On January 25, 1963, the local board sent … [See: Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549, 553 , 64 S.Ct. 346 , 88 L.Ed. 305 (1944); Moore v. United States, 302 F.2d 929 (9th Cir. 1962); United States v.

Kottmyer v. Maas

436 F.3d 684 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 18, 2006

Kottmyer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Aimee MAAS; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Hamilton County Board of Commissioners, and Debbie Ayer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-3033. … See Lillard v. Shelby County Board of Education, 76 F.3d 716, 726-27 (6th Cir.1996).

Charles Hollis, Jr. v. Chestnut Bend Homeowners Ass'n

760 F.3d 531 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 29, 2014

Three members comprised the ARC, all of whom the board appointed but none of whom were members of the board. … One board member acted as a liaison between the ARC and the board, and Turner acted as a liaison between the ARC and the homeowners.

Winchester, Huggins, Charlton, Leake, Brown and Slater v. Darlys Faye Steed

782 F.2d 1044 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 24, 1985

WINCHESTER, HUGGINS, CHARLTON, LEAKE, BROWN and SLATER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … PER CURIAM. 1 Plaintiff Winchester, Huggins, Charlton, Leake, Brown & Slater appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee sustaining the bankruptcy court's finding that no

Kehn v. McFaul

614 F.2d 1120 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 20, 1980

On appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio, the judgment of conviction was affirmed as to each appellant in an opinion reported in State v. Kehn, et al., 50 Ohio St.2d 11 , 361 N.E.2d 1330 (1977).

Columbus Services, Inc. v. Preferred Building Maintenance, Inc.

398 F.2d 80 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 23, 1968

398 F.2d 80 COLUMBUS SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PREFERRED BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC., and Richard D. Brown, John E. Bremer, Forrest S. Tarr, Wally G. Gast, Raymond A. Gast, and Fred C. … Plaintiff was also authorized to name two members to corporate defendant's Board of Directors. 5 To fulfill its obligations under both the 1963 and 1964 contracts, plaintiff entered into an employment contract with Carl Miller

Automatic Weaponry, Inc. v. Friedman

21 F. App'x 421 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 25, 2001

See Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 167 F.3d 286, 289 (6th Cir.1999). … In coming to this conclusion, Judge Roberts rejected the minority view supported only by Genn v.