Case law

Juan Gamas-Vicente v. Todd Blanche

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 2026

We review the Board’s written opinion as a final agency order, and the IJ’s opinion to the extent that the Board adopted and affirmed its findings and reasoning. Kilic v. Barr, 965 F.3d 469, 472 (6th Cir. 2020). … So we must compare Gamas-Vicente’s brief before the Board to his brief before our court to determine whether he exhausted his claims. Cuevas-Nuno v.

Ronald Bradley, (84-1364), (84-1365) v. William J. Milliken, Detroit Federation of Teachers, Intervening (84-1364), Intervening (84-1365)

772 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1985

See Bradley v. Milliken, 402 F.Supp. 1096, 1142-43 (E.D.Mich.1975). On July 3, 1975, the district court rejected the Board’s first draft of the code and provided guidelines for redrafting. … See Bradley v. Milliken, 460 F.Supp. 299, 318-20 (E.D.Mich.1978). 6 .

Katie M. Johnson v. Chattanooga Board of Education

927 F.2d 604 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 1991

JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHATTANOOGA BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-5593. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 27, 1991. … Gregg v.

Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Clinchfield Railroad Company

407 F.2d 985 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 1969

United Steelworkers of America v. Enterpris Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593 , 80 S.Ct. 1358 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960) ; United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Nav. … Co. v. Union Pac. R. Co., 254 F. 235 (8th Cir. 1918); Arbitration: Ilios S & T Corp. and American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp., 148 F.Supp. 698 (DC N.Y.1957); Petrol Corporation v.

Cory v. Hamilton Nat. Bank

31 F.2d 379 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 1929

Co. v. Hutchinson (C. C. A.) 63 F. 496 . … Sanford Fork & Tool Co. v. Howe, Brown & Co., 157 U. S. 312 , 15 S. Ct. 621 , 39 L. Ed. 713 . See Fifth Third National Bank v. Johnson, 219 F. 89, 93 (C. C.

Inge v. Rock Financial Corp.

281 F.3d 613 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 2002

See id. at 1301 ; Trotter, 219 F.3d at 1183; see also Brown v. Local 58, Int’l Bhd. of Elec. … "Unless demonstrably irrational, Federal Reserve Board staff opinions construing the Act or Regulation should be dispositive...." Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

Karst Robbins Coal Co. v. OWCP

969 F.3d 316 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 2020

Standard of Review On petitions for review from the Benefits Review Board, we review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo. Island Creek Coal Co. v. Young, 947 F.3d 399, 403 (6th Cir. 2020). … We do, however, grant deference to the Board’s interpretations of both the BLBA and its own regulations. Ark. Coals, Inc. v. Lawson, 739 F.3d 309, 315 (6th Cir. 2014); Cumberland River Coal Co. v.

Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

528 F.3d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 2008

(JA 88) (citing Banks v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 977 F.2d 1081, 1087 (7th Cir.1992), Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)). … See Worldwide Basketball at 955; National Collegiate *433 Athletic Association v. Board of Regents, 468 U.S. 85, 98 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984).

National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations, A/K/A Ymca of the U.S.A. v. The Flint Young Men's Christian Association of Flint, Michigan

764 F.2d 199 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 24, 1985

The plaintiff, relying on Omega Importing Corp. v. … In Omega, Judge Friendly reaffirmed a standard first enunciated by Judge Frank in Hamilton Watch Co. v.

Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Milliken

866 F.2d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 1989

In this instance, the Board took it upon itself to correct a perceived erroneous application of law by the AU. We must now determine whether the Board’s action was proper. As synopsized in Mullins Coal Co. v. … In Kyle v.

Quickway Transp., Inc. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 11, 2024

Id. at 26 (Board Dec. at 26).  Nos. 23-1780/1820 Quickway Transp., Inc. v. … Id. at 28 (Board Dec. at 28 n.68); see also Sure-Tan, Inc. v.

Kingsley Owusu v. Merrick B. Garland

91 F.4th 460 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 24, 2024

Our review of that factual finding is “highly deferential,” so we won’t disturb the Board’s finding unless the evidence “compels” a different result. Harmon v. … See Palucho v.

Bruce Osborne v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

465 F.3d 296 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 3, 2006

Houseal, Jr., Glanker Brown, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant. David A. Thornton, Bass, Barry & Sims, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee. … See Perez v.

Newcomer v. Scriven Co.

168 F. 621 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 23, 1909

Diamond Match Company v. Saginaw Match Company, 142 Fed. 727 , 74 C. C. A. 59 ; Regensburg *624 v. Portuondo Cigar Mfg. Company, 142 Fed. 160 , 73 C. C. A. 378 ; Leschen Sons’ Rope Company v. … Company v. June Mfg. Company, 163 U. S. 185 , 16 Sup. Ct. 1002, 41 L.

Robert A. Bethel v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, a Foreign Corporation

89 F.3d 832 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 1996

BETHEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-1470. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 4, 1996. … Bethel, appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, in his lawsuit based upon claims of age discrimination and wrongful termination. 2 Having

Bankr. L. Rep. P 68,272 Gail Spilman v. Darryl M. Harley

656 F.2d 224 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 1981

See Brown v. … See Rahm, supra, 641 F.2d at 756 ; Kasler, supra, 611 F.2d at 309; Brown v. Buchanan, 419 F.Supp. 199, 201 (E.D.Va.1975).

O'Rear v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

80 F.2d 473 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1935

The Board is authorized to prescribe such rules of practice and procedure. Bankers’ Coal Co. v. Burnet, 287 U.S. 308, 312 , 53 S.Ct. 150 , 77 L.Ed. 325 . … It has been repeatedly held that the granting of a rehearing rests within the sound discretion of the Board. Freeman-Hampton Oil Corporation v. Commissioner, 65 F.(2d) 456 (C.C.A.5); Weiller et al. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc.

811 F.2d 607 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 1, 1986

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CINCINNATI BRONZE, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-3646. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 1, 1986. … Unfortunately, and in contravention of the Board's rules, 29 CFR Sec. 102.111(b), the Board did not serve a copy of the subpoena on CBI's attorney.

Luanna Grote v. Kenton County, Ky.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 2023

Brown was present when Brand conducted the medical assessment. R. 116-7 (Brown Dep. at 12:8–10) (Page ID #931). And Brown heard Grote tell Brand that he had ingested a half gram of methamphetamine at noon. … Shadrick v. Hopkins County, 805 F.3d 724, 739 (6th Cir. 2015) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997)).

Aloyisus M. Brown v. Dewey Sowders, Warden

909 F.2d 1482 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 3, 1990

BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dewey SOWDERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-6146. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 3, 1990. 1 Before KEITH and RALPH B. … The petition also arguably contains a claim that the trial court did not advise Brown properly before accepting his guilty plea. However, that argument has been abandoned in Brown's brief on appeal. See McMurphy v.