Case law

Juan Carlos Pastor-Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 17, 2025

See Mata v. Lynch, 576 U.S. 143, 147–48 (2015). Yet, given the Board’s discretion over these motions, courts must review denials under “a deferential, abuse-of- discretion standard of review.” Valadez-Lara v. … And the question whether the Board applied the correct legal standard raises a pure issue of law that we have jurisdiction to review. See Ba v. Holder, 358 F.

Newcomer v. Scriven Co.

168 F. 621 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 23, 1909

Diamond Match Company v. Saginaw Match Company, 142 Fed. 727 , 74 C. C. A. 59 ; Regensburg *624 v. Portuondo Cigar Mfg. Company, 142 Fed. 160 , 73 C. C. A. 378 ; Leschen Sons’ Rope Company v. … Company v. June Mfg. Company, 163 U. S. 185 , 16 Sup. Ct. 1002, 41 L.

COMMISSIONER OF INT. REVENUE v. Brier Hill Collieries

50 F.2d 777 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 1931

Reineke v. Spalding, 280 U. S. 227 , 50 S. Ct. 96 , 74 L. Ed. 385 . … In this situation we think the Board should have accepted the book values. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co., 258 U. S. 165 , 42 S. Ct. 264 , 66 L. Ed. 538 . Kings County Lighting Co. v. Nixon (D. C.) 268 F. 143 .

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

136 F. App'x 752 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 30, 2005

Standard of Review The Board’s findings of fact will not be disturbed as long as they are supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … See NLRB v. Talsol Corp., 155 F.3d 785, 793 (6th Cir. 1998). The Board’s conclusions of law are subject to de novo review, and its reasonable interpretations of the NLRA are to be afforded deference. Lee v.

Williams v. Moore

34 F. App'x 475 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 2002

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Porter v. … Knuckles El v. Toombs, 215 F.3d 640, 642 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1040 , 121 S.Ct. 634 , 148 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998) (per curiam).

Park Bros. & Co. v. Kelly Axe Manuf'g Co.

49 F. 618 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 29, 1892

In Cooke v. … Brown v. Munger, (Minn.) 44 N. W. Rep. 519 . This question arose in Fishmongers' Co. v.

Checinski v. United States

129 F.2d 461 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1942

The defense in the court below in each: of the cases; and the argument in sup-, port of - the appéal, follow substantially the pattern set in the case of Rase v. … Each was by his local board or upon appeal from the decision óf the local boards, classified as a conscientious, objector under classification IV-E, and ordered to report for induction into work of national importance under

Southerland v. Sycamore Community School District Board of Education

125 F. App'x 14 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 2004

No. 03-4189 Southerland v. Sycamore Community School District Board of Education I. … ” - 10 - No. 03-4189 Southerland v. Sycamore Community School District Board of Education United States v. Levy, 904 F.2d 1026, 1029 (6th Cir. 1990).

Perry v. United Parcel Service

90 F. App'x 860 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 30, 2004

See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989). “[M]ore than bare assertions of legal conclusions is ordinarily required to satisfy federal notice pleading requirements.” Scheid, 859 F.2d at 436 . … See Codd v. Brown, 949 F.2d 879, 882 (6th Cir.1991). Perry fails to state a claim. He has wholly failed to identify the source of the rights that forms the basis for his claim against UPS.

In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative Litigation

511 F.3d 611 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 2008

Lewis v. … Co. v.

In the Matter of Esley L. Corbin, Sr., Bankrupt. Dr. James Poon v. David H. Todd, Trustee

350 F.2d 514 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1965

The District Court relied upon In re Brown, 85 Ohio Law Abst. 463 , (Ohio, 1960), and Neyer v. Reuben H. Donnelley *516 Corporation, 78 Ohio App. 216 , 69 N.E.2d 435 (1946). … In In re Brown, 85 Ohio Law Abst. 463 , the Ohio court reached a similar conclusion.

Guennadi Y. Mikhailevitch v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

146 F.3d 384 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 1998

The Board’s determination “must be upheld if ‘supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.’ ” INS v. … See Borca v.

Austin Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

35 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 15, 1929

In Woodworth v. Kales, 26 F.(2d) 178 (6 C. C. … A question made in this court but not presented to the Board of Tax Appeals is that the assessment is barred by the statute of limitations. Reliance is placed on Russell v. United States, 278 U. S. 181 , 49 S.

United States v. David Lee Brown, United States of America v. Terry Francis Gallagher, United States of America v. Clayton Colwell, Jr., United States of America v. James Adams, Iii, United States of America v. Donald E. Pitts, United States of America v. Kenneth L. Hale

571 F.2d 980 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 7, 1978

571 F.2d 980 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Francis GALLAGHER, Defendant-Appellant. … Little, Kettering, Ohio (Court-appointed CJA), for David Lee brown. Gerald R. Westbrock (advisor), Dayton, Ohio, Terry Francis Gallagher in pro per., for Terry Francis Gallagher. Alex V.

National Labor Relations Board v. St. Mary's Acquisition Co.

240 F. App'x 8 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 14, 2007

Universal Camera Corp. v. … Id. at 693 (citing NLRB v.

Avco Corp., Electronics & Ordnance Division v. Mitchell

336 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1964

This Court held in Local 748, etc. v. … We agree with the trial judge that the Board’s opinion on the question of timeliness constitutes an interpretation of the contract. In United Steelworkers of America v.

United States v. Kenneth R. Berry

21 F.3d 428 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 24, 1994

Berry does not dispute that he telephoned Brown or that Brown flew to Texas with money. … Viereck v.

Christine Boykin v. Hamilton County Board of Education

869 F.2d 1488 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 21, 1989

Christine BOYKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-4025. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 21, 1989. Before MERRITT and RALPH B. … Batson v.

Golden Living Center-Frankfort v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

656 F.3d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 31, 2011

.”); Key v. … Duration of Penalties Golden did not contest the Appeal Board’s decision regarding the duration of noncompliance in its initial brief. See Sanborn v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Jerry J. Buckley, D/B/A Buckley Development Company and West Side Lumber and Coal Compnay

295 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 4, 1961

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for summary entry of a Decree against the respondent herein, enforcing its orders of March 22, 1960 and July 24,1961. … This Court has considered the entire transcript of record filed in this cause and on being fully advised in the premises, issued its decision granting the petition and enforcing the Orders of the Board.