Case law

James R. Berry and Lucille Berry v. Bert Allen, James R. Watts, William P. Lusk and Joe Jones

411 F.2d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 20, 1969

The Board appealed to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky which reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court and held that the Board was justified in denying Appellees’ application. Moberly v. … Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (5th Cir.1964).

Dr. Godwin U. Ekechuku v. Alcohol, Drug Addiction & Mental Health Services Board Gary M. Schaeufele and Paul Vanderschie

37 F.3d 1498 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 1994

EKECHUKU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALCOHOL, DRUG ADDICTION & MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES BOARD; Gary M. Schaeufele; and Paul Vanderschie, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-3910. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … See Wrenn v.

Board of County Commissioners, Holmes County, Ohio v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Company & Twin City Fire Insurance Company

37 F.3d 1498 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 3, 1994

EEOC v. University of Detroit 904 F.2d 331 , 334 (6th Cir.1990). … City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati Ins.

United States v. Maddox

944 F.2d 1223 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 3, 1991

V The court allowed some testimony regarding Richard Ford’s connection with the Ray-Ray Browning conspiracy, and the extent of that conspiracy. … United States v. Kelley, 849 F.2d 999, 1004 (6th Cir.1988). The government’s theory was that the Ray-Ray Browning organization supplied the Maddox organization with cocaine.

United States v. Triana

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 2, 2006

In addition, effective June 11, 1999, the State of Ohio Medical Board permanently revoked Triana’s podiatry license. No. 05-3173 United States v. … At sentencing, the district court, relying on United States v. Brown, 151 F.3d 476 (6th Cir. 1998) and United States v. Nastasi, 2002 WL 1267995 (E.D.N.Y.

United States v. Jenkins

4 F.3d 1338 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 21, 1993

United States v. Brown, 946 F.2d 1191, 1195 (6th Cir.1991). The Sixth Amendment does not give criminal defendants absolute control over cross-examination. Dorsey v. … Brown did not preserve this argument because he did not renew his motion for severance at the close of the evidence. United States v.

Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Robertson

139 F. 519 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 6, 1905

Plaintiff testified that when he asked for shields, and told Brown, the foreman, that there was none in his box and had been none since he had had the engine, that Brown replied, “Well, they must be fixed.” … The sole evidence on that line is the statement of Robertson that Brown said it must be fixed.

Ahmed Ali Moosa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

760 F.2d 715 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 2, 1985

In Stevic v. … Since the Board applied the more stringent clear-probability test, the holding cannot stand. 693 F.2d at 599 In INS v.

Feliciano v. City of Cleveland

988 F.2d 649 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 16, 1993

Before: KENNEDY and GUY, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. … In Monell v.

Tommy Ray Mays, II v. Frank LaRose

951 F.3d 775 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 3, 2020

And on Election Day, the boards must oversee each polling place, answer questions  No. 19-4112 Mays v. … V.

Stephen Manchester v. Orlyn C. Lewis

507 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 25, 1974

Martin, 480 F.2d 705, 708-709 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1075 , 94 S.Ct. 592 , 38 L.Ed.2d 482 (1973); George v. Board of Educ., 472 F.2d 132, 133 (6th Cir. 1972); Orr v. … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 , Board of Trustees of Arkansas A & M College v.

Dan Bennett v. CMH Homes, Inc.

770 F.3d 511 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 30, 2014

Judge Echols then passed the case to Magistrate Judge Brown for pre-trial processing. … Counsel did not address the jurisdictional issue when Magistrate Judge Brown provided them with an opportunity.

Charter Communications, Inc. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 25, 2019

Brown Transp. Corp., 294 N.L.R.B. 969, 971 (1989); see also Aladdin Gaming, LLC, 345 N.L.R.B. 585, 585–86 (2005); Emenee Accessories, Inc., 267 N.L.R.B. 1344, 1344 (1983); Porta Sys. … The majority points to a line of Board decisions  Nos. 18-1778/1895 Charter Commc’ns, Inc. v.

Guennadi Y. Mikhailevitch v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

146 F.3d 384 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 1998

The Board’s determination “must be upheld if ‘supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.’ ” INS v. … See Borca v.

Marc Belding Anderson v. General Lewis B. Hershey, National Director, Selective Service System

410 F.2d 492 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 1969

See Kolden v. Selective Service Local Board No. 4, 406 F.2d 631 (8th Cir., January 28, 1969). … See Zigmond v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 396 F.2d 290 (1st Cir. 1968). .

28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1491, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,679

679 F.2d 541 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 1982

See Brown v. Neeb, 644 F.2d at 562 ; United States v. … See, e.g., Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 15 , 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1275 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Brown, supra.

United States v. Freddie B. Brown, III

941 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 20, 1991

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Freddie B. BROWN, III, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-3590. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 20, 1991. … United States v. Carroll, 893 F.2d 1502, 1506 (6th Cir.1990); see United States v.

Robert Davis v. Detroit Pub. Sch. Cmty. Dist.

899 F.3d 437 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 2018

On June 20, 2017, Plaintiffs emailed the school board, the board’s president, Dr. … See Smith v. Jefferson Cty. Bd. of Sch.

Reigel v. Harrison

157 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 1946

See Hahn v. Elliott, 28 O.L.A. 353 ; Ward v. Campbell, Com.Pl., 1 Ohio Supp. 192 ; Boblitt v. Cleveland, C., C., etc., R. Co., 73 Ohio App. 339 , 56 N.E.2d 348 ; Mace v. … Myers v. Bethlehem Corp., 303 U.S. 41 , 50, 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 ; Macauley v. Waterman Steamship Corporation, 66 S.Ct. 712 .

Vasquez Salazar v. Mukasey

514 F.3d 643 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 31, 2008

Therefore, we review the Board’s decision to deny a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion. See Sswajje v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 528, 532 (6th Cir.2003). … See Anssari-Gharachedaghy v. INS, 246 F.3d 512, 514 (6th Cir.2000); Malak v. Gonzales, 419 F.3d 533, 534 (6th Cir.2005).