Case law

Eastern Greyhound Lines v. Fusco

310 F.2d 632 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1962

Under applicable decisions, it seems now to be clear that unless *635 the Board’s action is so patently without legality as was the case in Leedom v. … Dunn v. Retail Clerks, etc., 299 F.2d 873 , 874 (C.A.6, 1962). We have considered Eastern’s contention that Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 ; Leedom v.

Northridge Church v. Charter Township of Plymouth

647 F.3d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 28, 2011

After a hearing, the Plymouth Township Planning Board (collectively with the Township, “Plymouth”) denied Northridge’s application. … Brown v. Neeb, 644 F.2d 551, 560 (6th Cir. 1981) (noting that, if a court determines that modification is proper, modifying the judgment “would require a complete hearing and findings of fact” (citing United States v.

Rick Espinoza and Bruce Roller v. George Wilson, William Seabold and Betty Batts

814 F.2d 1093 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 1987

In Jones v. … In Meadows v.

Dino Drop, Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 23, 2022

Nos. 21-2644/2715/2718 Brown Jug, et al. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. … Nos. 21-2644/2715/2718 Brown Jug, et al. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 368, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7652 John McFerren Jr., and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, and Mrs. Mable C. Walker, Intervening v. County Board of Education of Fayette County, Tennessee

455 F.2d 199 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 28, 1972

Chambers v. Hendersonville City Board of Education, supra, [ 364 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1966)]." Rolfe v. … Hatton v. County Board of Education of Maury County, Tennessee, 422 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1970); Rolfe v. County Board of Education of Lincoln County, Tennessee, 391 F.2d 77 (6th Cir. 1968); Hill v.

Ohio State Conference of the National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Husted

769 F.3d 385 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 12, 2014

Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433 , 129 S.Ct. 1749 , 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009) (quoting Virginian R. Co. v. United States, 272 U.S. 658, 672-73 , 47 S.Ct. 222 , 71 L.Ed. 463 (1926)). … Defendants point to their experience in the early-voting case from 2012, Obama for America v. Husted, 697 F.3d 423 (6th Cir.2012).

Duane R. Miller v. Barberton Municipal Court

935 F.2d 775 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 23, 1991

Miller was not naked on the diving board, he did not use the slide, he was not jumping in and out of the pool. Id. at 75-76. … See State v. Klein, 51 Ohio App.2d 1 , 364 N.E.2d 1169 (1977) (negligence is insufficient to convict when recklessness is required).

Massey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

51 F.2d 76 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1931

V. Board v. Commissioner, 51 F.(2d) 73 , this day delivered. … S. v. Board et al. (D. C.) 14 F.(2d) 459 . Presumably, therefore, the claim of the government was always without merit.

Kentucky Distilleries & WareHouse Co. v. Louisville Public Warehouse Co.

19 F.2d 866 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 1927

Under Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon Bank, 260 U. S. 235 , 43 S. Ct. 118 , 67 L. … If for the purpose of- the opinion, these general claims by Brown be accepted, they are still not sufficient.

Williams v. Bass

63 F.3d 483 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 1995

Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 466 , 103 S.Ct. 864, 868-69 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983). The board’s sanction was to terminate Williams’ minimum security status. … Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 , 103 S.Ct. 1741 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983); Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 , 103 S.Ct. 864 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); Meachum v.

Bennett L. Crowder, II v. J.K. Conlan

740 F.2d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 2, 1984

In Blum v. … In Hodges v.

James C. Stephens, Floyd G. Stephens, Richard Mahoney, Donald v. Nippert v. Retirement Income Plan for Pilots of U.S. Air, Inc.

464 F.3d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 13, 2006

Conrail v. Ry. … See Steel Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Wood Tech Services, Inc., Doing Business as American Wood Interiors, Inc.

62 F.3d 1418 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 1, 1995

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Petitioner, v. WOOD TECH SERVICES, INC., doing business as American Wood Interiors, Inc. Respondent. No. 95-5813. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 1, 1995. … Before: BROWN, MILBURN, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

Arthur Krause v. James A. Rhodes

570 F.2d 563 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 20, 1978

In Scheuer v. … BROWN: By one person? MARSHAL WAGNER: By one person. MR. BROWN: Well, that isn’t quite as bad. Oh, it’s bad— ****** MR. BROWN: [3703] Were the threats here in the area of the Courthouse or elsewhere?

Churchill's Super Markets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

857 F.2d 1474 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 1988

Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 87-6064. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Sept. 20, 1988. Before KEITH, KENNEDY and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. … See, e.g., Clark's Gamble Corp. v.

Ellis v. Cleveland Municipal

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 24, 2006

So she got up and told me to write my name on the board, and I did, and she got mad at me, and she slammed me up against the wall, and the back of my head hit the board, and she then slung me on the ground and … Brown v. Shaner, 172 F.3d 927, 931 (6th Cir. 1999).

45 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1721, 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,778 Frances Jones, Beverly Harder, Eleanor Murray, Linda Nickel, and Mary Ruane v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 299

838 F.2d 856 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 1989

See Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts, 467 U.S. 561 , 104 S.Ct. 2576 , 81 L.Ed.2d 483 (1984); Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 476 U.S. 267 , 106 S.Ct. 1842 , 90 L.Ed.2d 260 (1986). … Interference with a Federally Guaranteed Right --Brown Preemption 84 The simplest preemption doctrine provides that the States may not regulate conduct that is actually protected by federal law. See Brown v.

Smith v. Kaldor

869 F.2d 999 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1989

Brown v. … Quillen v. U.S. Postal Service, 564 F.Supp. 314, 318 (E.D.Mich.1983). See also Jacobs v. Board of Regents, 473 F.Supp. 663, 668 (S.D.Fla.1979) and cases collected there.

A & E Coal Co. v. James Adams

694 F.3d 798 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 11, 2012

The Board concluded that the ALJ did not violate the APA. We review the Board’s conclusion de novo. See Peabody Coal Co. v. Greer, 62 F.3d 801, 804 (6th Cir. 1995). … See Peabody Coal Co. v. Groves, 277 F.3d 829, 836 (6th Cir. 2002). Thus, the ALJ accurately and specifically referenced the evidence supporting his conclusions. The Board was correct to affirm his decision.

Williams v. Moore

34 F. App'x 475 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 2002

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Porter v. … Knuckles El v. Toombs, 215 F.3d 640, 642 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1040 , 121 S.Ct. 634 , 148 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998) (per curiam).