Case law

Robert E. Minehart v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.

731 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1984

In like fashion, a railroad employee’s attempt to forego Railway Adjustment Board procedures by filing suit in federal court was rejected in Dorsey v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 476 F.2d 243 (4th Cir.1973). … Nor does Minehart fall within the bounds of a very narrow exception to the preemption doctrine of exclusive jurisdiction in the Railway Adjustment Board indicated by this court in Kaschak v.

Navistar, Inc. v. Terry Forester

767 F.3d 638 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 12, 2014

Navistar appealed, but the Benefits Review Board (“BRB”) upheld the award of benefits. Navistar has now filed a Petition for Review of the BRB’s decision. … V.

Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes v. United Air Lines, Inc.

325 F.2d 576 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 1963

Switch-men’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; General Committee, etc. v. … Smith, 251 F.2d 282 (C.A.6), affirming Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co., 144 F.Supp. 869 (S.D. Ohio); Commercial Telegraphers’ Union v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 53 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C.) ; and Livingston v.

Ahmed Ali Moosa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

760 F.2d 715 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 2, 1985

In Stevic v. … Since the Board applied the more stringent clear-probability test, the holding cannot stand. 693 F.2d at 599 In INS v.

National Surety Co. v. Jean

36 F.2d 468 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 13, 1929

Draper v. Vanhorn, 12 Ind. 352 ; Harper et al. v. Keys, 43 Ind. 220 ; Sannes v. Ross, 105 Ind. 558 , 5 N. E. 699 ; Vurpillat v. Zehner, 2 Ind. *470 App. 397 , 28 N. E. 556 . … Bick v. Lang, 15 Ind. App. 503 , 44 N. E. 555 . Compare, also, Webster et al. v. Major, 33 Ind. App. 202 , 71 N. E. 176 ; Milligan v. Poole, 35 Ind. 64 .

Robert Davis v. Detroit Pub. Sch. Cmty. Dist.

899 F.3d 437 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 2018

On June 20, 2017, Plaintiffs emailed the school board, the board’s president, Dr. … See Smith v. Jefferson Cty. Bd. of Sch.

National Labor Relations Board v. Wood Tech Services, Inc., Doing Business as American Wood Interiors, Inc.

62 F.3d 1418 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 1, 1995

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Petitioner, v. WOOD TECH SERVICES, INC., doing business as American Wood Interiors, Inc. Respondent. No. 95-5813. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 1, 1995. … Before: BROWN, MILBURN, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

Karimi-Janaki v. Holder

579 F.3d 710 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 28, 2009

Where the Board affirms the IJ’s ruling but adds its own comments, we review both the IJ’s decision and the Board’s additional remarks. Gilaj v. Gonzales, 408 F.3d 275, 283 (6th Cir.2005). … See Chen v.

Pigott v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad

221 F.2d 736 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 1955

Pigott v. Detroit, T. & I. R. Co., 116 F.Supp. at page 956 . “UROC has never sought the right to participate in the selection of labor members of the Board. … Under the circumstances, the matter can only be left to the Adjustment Board, or .a System Board as the case may be, in each dispute involving that question.” United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Pennsylvania R.

United States v. Sterling Roberts

84 F.4th 659 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 17, 2023

Caldwell was en route to the address that “Brown” had provided him in Jamestown, Ohio when “Brown” texted him a new address for their meeting. Mr. … Caldwell became suspicious, so he asked “Brown” to call him, but “Brown” refused to do so. Mr.

BAPTIST HOSPITAL EAST, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

802 F.2d 860 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 1986

Center v. … Luke’s Hosp. v. Secretary of H.H.S., 632 F.Supp. 1387 (D.Mass.1986). In St. Mary, the provider had self-disallowed the costs for which it was seeking Board review. Accordingly, St.

Glenn v. Hanner

212 F.2d 483 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 21, 1954

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel for the respective parties; And it appearing that the trust created on March 25, 1936, amended January 13, 1939, by the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation … Saxton, 12 T.C. 569 ; Higgs’ Estate v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 184 F.2d 427 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Twogood’s Estate, 2 Cir., 194 F.2d 627 ; Dimock v.

Fish v. Sapp

3 F. App'x 334 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 29, 2001

Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). Initially, we must address an issue not raised by the parties. See Brown v. … See Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1103-04 . Otherwise, the district court is required to dismiss the complaint without prejudice. See Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

Paul Ziah Dallo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

765 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 20, 1985

Balani v. INS, 669 F.2d 1157, 1161 (6th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Petitioner makes no claim that the Board’s order rested on an impermissible basis such as invidious discrimination. … See, e.g., Aronson v. May, 85 S.Ct. 3 , 13 L.Ed.2d 6 (1964) (Douglas, J., in chambers); Ostrer v. United States, 584 F.2d 594 (2d Cir.1978); Calley v. Callaway, 496 F.2d 701 (5th Cir.1974) (per curiam); Baker v.

Rick Espinoza and Bruce Roller v. George Wilson, William Seabold and Betty Batts

814 F.2d 1093 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 1987

In Jones v. … In Meadows v.

Smith v. Kaldor

869 F.2d 999 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1989

Brown v. … Quillen v. U.S. Postal Service, 564 F.Supp. 314, 318 (E.D.Mich.1983). See also Jacobs v. Board of Regents, 473 F.Supp. 663, 668 (S.D.Fla.1979) and cases collected there.

Della Brown Alice G. Harris v. Chester D. Harris Rosemary Hunt Denise Deberry Wayne Cook Dennis Bradley Lexington Fayette Urban County Government

53 F.3d 331 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 1995

ORDER 1 Della Brown and Alice G. … Brown's claims are barred under the res judicata doctrine, White v. Colgan Elec. Co., 781 F.2d 1214, 1216 (6th Cir. 1986), Harris's claim against LFUCG is time-barred, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. Sec. 413.140(a)(8); Collard v.

4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 368, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7652 John McFerren Jr., and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, and Mrs. Mable C. Walker, Intervening v. County Board of Education of Fayette County, Tennessee

455 F.2d 199 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 28, 1972

Chambers v. Hendersonville City Board of Education, supra, [ 364 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1966)]." Rolfe v. … Hatton v. County Board of Education of Maury County, Tennessee, 422 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1970); Rolfe v. County Board of Education of Lincoln County, Tennessee, 391 F.2d 77 (6th Cir. 1968); Hill v.

Ohio State Conference of the National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Husted

769 F.3d 385 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 12, 2014

Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433 , 129 S.Ct. 1749 , 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009) (quoting Virginian R. Co. v. United States, 272 U.S. 658, 672-73 , 47 S.Ct. 222 , 71 L.Ed. 463 (1926)). … Defendants point to their experience in the early-voting case from 2012, Obama for America v. Husted, 697 F.3d 423 (6th Cir.2012).

Harold Zimmerman v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

871 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 1989

We have held that the Board “must affirm the administrative law judge if his or her decision is supported by substantial evidence and is not irrational.” Campbell v. … Mullen v. Bowen, 800 F.2d 535, 545-46 (6th Cir.1986) (en banc).