Case law

Couch v. City Of Detroit

21 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 29, 1994

Harold COUCH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CITY OF DETROIT, et al.; Defendants. … Charles Wing, Police Officer; Kevin Brown, Police Officer; Michael Marsalis, Police Officer; Duane Blackmon, Police Officer; Brenda Makulski, Police Officer, Defendants-Appellants. No. 933-1192.

In re Ann Arbor Mach. Corp.

274 F. 24 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1921

Brady v. Bernard (C. C. A. 6) 170 Fed. 576, 579 , 95 C. C. A. 656 ; In re De Camp Glass Casket Co., decided by this court April 15, 1921, 272 Fed. 558 . And see Vallely v. Insurance Co., 254 U. S. 348, 356 , 41 Sup. … A. v) of this court.

Comm. to Impose Term Limits on the Ohio Supreme Court v. Ohio Ballot Bd.

885 F.3d 443 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 20, 2018

Defendants-Appellees are the Ohio Ballot Board (“the Board”), its five individual members, and Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine (collectively “Defendants”). … See PEST Comm. v.

45 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1721, 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,778 Frances Jones, Beverly Harder, Eleanor Murray, Linda Nickel, and Mary Ruane v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 299

838 F.2d 856 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 1989

See Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts, 467 U.S. 561 , 104 S.Ct. 2576 , 81 L.Ed.2d 483 (1984); Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 476 U.S. 267 , 106 S.Ct. 1842 , 90 L.Ed.2d 260 (1986). … Interference with a Federally Guaranteed Right --Brown Preemption 84 The simplest preemption doctrine provides that the States may not regulate conduct that is actually protected by federal law. See Brown v.

Peabody Coal Co. And Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Elizabeth Ford and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. Of Labor

74 F.3d 1240 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 10, 1996

Application of the Brown Standard 9 During the pendency of Mrs. Ford's claim, we decided Brown v. … That evidence addressed the relevant inquiry prior to Brown and continued to do so after Brown. On the facts of this case, refusing the petition for a new hearing works no manifest injustice. See Peabody Coal Co. v.

Knapp v. Martin

22 F. App'x 589 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 2001

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e; Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … See Freeman v.. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 645 (6th Cir.1999); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

Francis Spadafore and Carol Spadafore v. Chet Gardner

330 F.3d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 2003

They were backed up by officers Ivan Belew, Eric Brown, Stan Brown, Timothy McCabe, Arthur Robinson, and John Woods. … At the same time, Eric Brown fired shots at the vehicle from the rear*. Brown and Gardner both concede that these shots were fired with the intent to stop Spadafore and his van.

Jackson v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools

494 F. App'x 539 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 2012

Jackson v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, et al. … Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1312 (6th Cir. 1989) (citation and quotation marks omitted).

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wells

132 F.2d 405 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 1, 1942

In Ryerson v. … In Welch v.

Eubanks v. CBSK Fin Grp

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 1, 2004

Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761, 775 (6th Cir. 2002). … Browning, 283 F.3d at 775. In Browning, we looked to our sister circuits, including the Third Circuit’s Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey Bank, 848 F.2d 414 (3d Cir. 1988), for guidance. Id.

Schaub v. Detroit Newspaper Agency

154 F.3d 276 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1998

SCHAUB, Regional Director of the Seventh Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … just short of being moot," see Danielson v.

Alison Kareem v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Elections

95 F.4th 1019 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 14, 2024

In McKay v. … In Platt v.

John S. Collins v. National Labor Relations Board

94 F.3d 644 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 1996

COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-3616. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 12, 1996. Before: WELLFORD, NORRIS and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges. … In Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 (1958), the Supreme Court opened the door to district court jurisdiction in limited cases involving appeals from Board orders.

Peter Bormuth v. County of Jackson

849 F.3d 266 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 2017

Accordingly, we undertook the task in United States v. Cundiff, which applied the “narrowest grounds” rule to Rapanos v. … Inst. of Am., Inc. v. Snyder, 827 F.3d 549, 560 (6th Cir. 2016) (alteration omitted) (quoting Cellnet Commc’ns, Inc. v.

Madden v. Chattanooga City Wide Service Department

549 F.3d 666 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 25, 2008

Mary’s Honor Center v. … See Wilson v. Stroh Cos., 952 F.2d 942 , 946 (6th Cir.1992); see also Christian v.

Henderson v. Corrections Corp. of America

22 F. App'x 573 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 2001

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir.1998). … See Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 645 (6th Cir.1999); Brown, 139 F.3d at 1104 .

United States v. Leonard O. Bowling

666 F.2d 1052 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 1981

See United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1981); United States v. Brown, 635 F.2d 1207 (6th Cir. 1980). … In United States v.

Cremeans v. City of Roseville

861 F.2d 878 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 28, 1988

Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1491 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … In this case Asman was a member of a four person retirement board. 5 In our recent en banc decision in Duchesne v.

McGrew's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

135 F.2d 158 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 12, 1943

It is true, as insisted by the petitioner, that the Board of Tax Appeals was in error in its view, derived from Williams v. … In Del Vecchio v.

Lucas Burgess v. Gene Fischer

735 F.3d 462 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 2013

Blackmore v. Kalamazoo Cnty., 390 F.3d 890, 897 (6th Cir. 2004). Second, we determine whether the defendant had a “‘sufficiently culpable state of mind’” in denying medical care under the subjective prong. Brown v. … However, Plaintiffs make no argument on appeal that a statutory exception applies to the Board—so that issue is not before us. No. 12-4191 Burgess, et al. v. Fischer, et al.