Case law

Amadou Lamine Sarr v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General

485 F.3d 354 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 19, 2007

See Liti v. Gonzales, 411 F.3d 631, 638 (6th Cir.2005) (quoting Secaida-Rosales v. … “The Board’s denial of a motion to remand is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” Abu-Khaliel v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 627, 634 (6th Cir.2006).

Schaub v. Detroit Newspaper Agency

154 F.3d 276 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1998

The Board cannot “compel concessions or otherwise sit in judgment upon the substantive terms ... of collective bargaining agreements.” NLRB v. American Nat’l Ins. … just short of being moot,” see Danielson v.

United States v. Erie R.

172 F. 50 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1909

Justice Brown, in The Albert Dumois, 177 U. S. 240, 249 , 20 Sup. Ct. 595, 599, 44 L. … Justice Brown said (page 253 of 177 U. S:; and page 600 of 20 Sup. Ct.. [44 D.

Harvey Ray Cochran v. Willard Norvell, Warden, Etc.

446 F.2d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 13, 1971

Brown, who was one of two co-counsel for Appellant at his original trial — testified. The testimony of Mr. Brown is particularly damaging to most of the claimed constitutional infringements made by the Appellant. … Brown’s testimony in reaching its findings of fact.

Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.

794 F.2d 213 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 23, 1986

The contract case which fell within rule four was Guardian Depositors Corp. v. Brown, 290 Mich. 433 , 287 N.W. 798 (1939). … This rule was laid down in Hughes v. Judges’ Retirement Board, 407 Mich. 75 , 282 N.W.2d 160 (1979), where plaintiff sought increased retirement benefits under a statute enacted after he retired.

Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, Department of Education of the Commonwealth of Kentucky

583 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 1978

Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Board of Education, 510 F.2d 1358 (6th Cir. 1974). See also Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. … North Carolina State Board of Education v. Swann, 402 U.S. 43 , 91 S.Ct. 1284 , 28 L.Ed.2d 586 (1971); Carroll v.

Dixie Sand & Gravel Corporation v. Pauline Holland

255 F.2d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1958

Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc. V. O’Leary, 9 Cir., 182 F.2d 772 . On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and affirmed the award of the Deputy Commissioner. … Brown v. Cowden Livestock Co., 9 Cir., 187 F.2d 1015, 1018 . (Emphasis supplied.) “Appellees argue that we are bound by the foregoing findings, since the record does not show that they are clearly erroneous.

Shamel Yousif v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

794 F.2d 236 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1986

Accordingly, the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard, Aiyadurai v. INS, 683 F.2d 1195, 1199 (8th Cir.1982); Kashani v. … The Board’s refusal to reinstate voluntary departure is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard, see, e.g., Ahwazi v. INS, 751 F.2d 1120, 1122 (9th Cir.1985); Muigai v.

United States v. Michael Davis (96-5895) and Miles Jones (96-5905)

170 F.3d 617 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1999

There is nothing in the record that indicates that the district court considered Brown’s decision to go to trial in fashioning Brown’s sentence. Brown, 147 F.3d at 488 . … Brown, 147 F.3d at 486 .

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. RAILWAY EMPLOYEES'DEPT., ETC.

93 F.2d 340 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 7, 1937

v. … v.

Mixon v. Ohio

193 F.3d 389 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 1999

Ritter v. … In Irby v.

United States v. Vincent Moran Doss

545 F.2d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 18, 1976

Significantly, however, for our purposes, and again apparently unanimously on this point, the Supreme Court noted, citing Brown v. … Brown v. United States, supra at 552.

National Labor Relations Board v. W.S. Smith Electric, Inc.

983 F.2d 1068 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 12, 1993

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. W.S. SMITH ELECTRIC, INC., Respondent. No. 92-6543. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Jan. 12, 1993. Before KEITH and ALAN E. … NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. 1 SUPPLEMENTAL JUDGMENT ENFORCING AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 2 This Court having on June 9, 1989, entered its judgment enforcing in full

National Labor Relations Board v. Viking Electric, Inc.

898 F.2d 154 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 23, 1990

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. VIKING ELECTRIC, INC., Respondent. No. 90-5242. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 23, 1990. JUDGMENT 1 Before RALPH B. … , Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said order contained. 4 Mandate shall issue forthwith. * The Honorable Avern Cohn, U.S.

Bossier Bank & Trust Co. v. Union Planters National Bank

550 F.2d 1077 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 1977

/s/ BAILEY BROWN CHIEF JUDGE APPENDIX B IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION No. C-75-101 BOSSIER BANK & TRUST COMPANY, A Louisiana Corporation, Plaintiff, v. … /s/ AARON BROWN, JR., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE .

Platt v. Bd. of Comm'rs on Grievances & Discipline of the Ohio Supreme Court

894 F.3d 235 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 25, 2018

The Board moved for a protective order against Platt’s discovery request, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar, 135 S. … But beyond these two points—which are fully explored above—the Board offers additional evidence that the Code’s enforcement procedures contain “clear standards to guide the discretion” of the Board. Leonardson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Engel Excavating, Inc.

893 F.2d 1335 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 1990

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ENGEL EXCAVATING, INC., Respondent. No. 89-6508. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Jan. 23, 1990. … Judgment Enforcing an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, NLRB, 7-CA-28667. Before BOYCE F.

City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company

734 F.2d 1157 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 24, 1984

After extensive hearings, the Commission’s Licensing Board agreed with the City and the Justice Department. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 336-37 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1529, 1530 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

Emory v. Memphis City Schools

23 F. App'x 355 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 29, 2001

Enertech Elec., Inc. v. Mahoning County Comm’rs, 85 F.3d 257 , 261 (6th Cir.1996). No exceptional circumstances exist in this case. … Link v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 1842, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio

283 F.2d 112 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 20, 1960

The credibility of the witnesses and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence are matters for determination by the Board. United Fireworks Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 252 F.2d 428, 430 . … N.L.R.B. v. Bishop, 6 Cir., 228 F.2d 68, 70 ; N.L.R.B. v. Aluminum Workers, etc., 7 Cir., 230 F.2d 515, 520 . The order of the Board based on such findings is not erroneous, and it is decreed that said order be enforced.