Case law

Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.

794 F.2d 213 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 23, 1986

The contract case which fell within rule four was Guardian Depositors Corp. v. Brown, 290 Mich. 433 , 287 N.W. 798 (1939). … This rule was laid down in Hughes v. Judges’ Retirement Board, 407 Mich. 75 , 282 N.W.2d 160 (1979), where plaintiff sought increased retirement benefits under a statute enacted after he retired.

Mark Filing v. William Phipps

503 F. App'x 297 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 23, 2012

Robert Brown, an expert in securities law. The defendants filed a motion to strike Brown’s expert report because it did not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 702. … See Woods v.

Hussam F. v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III

897 F.3d 707 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 27, 2018

But under Pula , the Board's analysis may not begin and end with his failure to follow proper immigration procedures. See Zuh v. … Hanna v. Holder , 740 F.3d 379 , 386 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting Maharaj v. Gonzales , 450 F.3d 961 , 967 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc) ). On appeal, the Government does not defend the Board's conclusion.

United States v. Salvatore T. "Sam" Busacca

936 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1991

See, e.g., Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. … See, e.g., United States v.

Cynthia Cunningham and Richard N. Morgan v. Ernest Grayson and Jefferson County Board of Education, Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, L. J. Hollenbach, Iii, County Judge, Intervenor. John E. Haycraft v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, John E. Haycraft v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, Anchorage Independent School District and Elizabeth Ewing, Superintendent, Intervening

541 F.2d 538 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 23, 1976

Ass'n, 467 F.2d 848, 872-873 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Board of Educ., 431 F.2d 59, 61 (5th Cir. 1970); Dowell v. … No. 151, 404 F.2d 1125, 1130 (7th Cir. 1968); Clark v. Board of Directors, 328 F.Supp. 1205, 1212 (E.D.Ark.1971); Harvest v. Board of Public Instruction, 312 F.Supp. 269, 272-274 (M.D.Fla.1970).

Matthew Gillis v. John Miller

845 F.3d 677 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 2017

See, e.g., Brown v. City of Trenton, 867 F.2d 318, 322 (6th Cir. 1989); Cherry v. … Brown, 867 F.2d at 322-23 .

Sameer Patel v. Shamrock Floorcovering Service

565 F.3d 963 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 12, 2009

In Carlisle Cashway, Inc. v. … And, in People v.

S.L. Ex Rel. K.L. v. Pierce Township Board of Trustees

509 F. App'x 536 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 3, 2013

No. 11-4003 S.L. v. Pierce Township Board of Trustees Homer questioned S.L. alone in S.L’s room. It is undisputed that S.L. then admitted that he had set some popsicle sticks on fire. … -2- No. 11-4003 S.L. v. Pierce Township Board of Trustees II.

Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor v. Local Union 20, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of Commerce

611 F.2d 645 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 19, 1979

In Wirtz v. … In United States v.

Amadou Lamine Sarr v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General

485 F.3d 354 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 19, 2007

See Liti v. Gonzales, 411 F.3d 631, 638 (6th Cir.2005) (quoting Secaida-Rosales v. … “The Board’s denial of a motion to remand is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” Abu-Khaliel v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 627, 634 (6th Cir.2006).

Schaub v. Detroit Newspaper Agency

154 F.3d 276 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1998

The Board cannot “compel concessions or otherwise sit in judgment upon the substantive terms ... of collective bargaining agreements.” NLRB v. American Nat’l Ins. … just short of being moot,” see Danielson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Fireproofing, Inc.

980 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 7, 1992

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ADVANCED FIREPROOFING, INC., Respondent. No. 92-6272. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 7, 1992. … Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Board's Office, 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 300, Detroit, Michigan 48226-2569, Telephone 313-226-3219.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sweetwater Crafts, Inc.

979 F.2d 851 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1992

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SWEETWATER CRAFTS, INC., Respondent. No. 92-6275. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 13, 1992. … , the Board, on May 8, 1992, issued its Decision and Order fixing the amount of backpay due the discriminatees and having thereafter applied to this Court for summary entry of a supplemental judgment specifying the amount

United States v. Robert Barnett

418 F.2d 309 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 28, 1969

Unlike Bruton v. … United States v. Barnett and MeInturff, 407 F.2d 1114 (6th Cir. 1969), and Mathis v. United States, 200 F.2d 697 (6th Cir. 1952).

National Labor Relations Board v. Asbestos Removal, Inc.

966 F.2d 1453 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 20, 1992

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ASBESTOS REMOVAL, INC., Respondent. No. 92-5397. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 20, 1992. Before DAVID A. NELSON and ALAN E. … in full the backpay provision of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, the Board, on February 28, 1991, issued its Supplemental Order fixing the amount of backpay due and having thereafter applied to this Court

National Labor Relations Board v. Engel Excavating, Inc.

960 F.2d 149 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 1992

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ENGEL EXCAVATING, INC., Respondent. No. 91-6255. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 16, 1992. Before BOYCE F. … The Board now seeks summary entry of a judgment enforcing the Board's Supplemental Order and specifying the amount of dues and fees owed by Engel Excavating, Inc. to the Union.

Juan Valadez-Lara v. William P. Barr

963 F.3d 560 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 26, 2020

For another, “[m]indful of the Board’s ‘broad discretion’” over whether to grant a motion to reopen, “courts have employed a deferential, abuse-of-discretion standard of review.” Kucana v. … Reweighing the evidence “is not part of this Court’s role” under our substantial-evidence standard of review for the Board’s findings of fact. See Lin v. Holder, 565 F.3d 971, 978 (6th Cir. 2009).

Zolton Ferency v. Richard H. Austin, Secretary of State Bernard Apol, Director, Elections Division, Department of State and Board of State Canvassers

666 F.2d 1023 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 7, 1981

BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge. … CSC v.

Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

351 F.3d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 2003

See Abdulai v. … Carriche v.

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. RAILWAY EMPLOYEES'DEPT., ETC.

93 F.2d 340 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 7, 1937

v. … v.