Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

3.71s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Fred H. Johnson, Trustee Under the Will of Clay M. Thomas, Deceased,d/b/a, Atlas Linen and Industrial Supply

    322 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 4, 1963

    National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Company, 304 U.S. 333 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Puerto Rico Rayon Mills, 293 F.2d 941 (C.A. 1) 1961.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Rieth-Riley Constr. Co., Inc. v. NLRB

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 13, 2026

    Inc., v. … We review de novo the Board’s legal conclusions, including the Board’s interpretation of the NLRA. NLRB v. Starbucks Corp., 159 F.4th 455, 468 (6th Cir. 2025).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. The Troxel Company

    945 F.2d 405 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 24, 1991

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The TROXEL COMPANY, Respondent. No. 91-5335. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … having advised this Court of their desire to dispose of this matter by entry of a judgment enforcing the Board's order; 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Court that the said order of the Board be and the same is

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Yan Xia Zhang v. Mukasey

    543 F.3d 851 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 8, 2008

    Ass’n v. … See Wang v.

    Cited 77 timesPublished
  • Jerry Duncan v. Leonard Muzyn

    833 F.3d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 2016

    Valley Auth. v. Kinzer, 142 F.2d 833, 836–37 (6th Cir. 1944). According to the Rules, the TVARS is governed by a seven-member board. … The board’s No. 15-6019 Duncan, et al. v. Muzyn, et al. Page 4 amendment prerogative is circumscribed by the Rules, too.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Stephen Hugueley v. Tony Mays

    964 F.3d 489 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 2020

    Brown. Indeed, Dr. Brown was appointed in January of 2008 and had over six months to evaluate Hugueley but had not even begun to do so by the time he was disqualified. See Hugueley II, 2011 WL 2361824, at *26. … Brown’s behalf—that prevented Dr. Brown from evaluating him. But Dr.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Kevin Murray v. United States Dep't of Treasury

    681 F.3d 744 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 2012

    Plaintiff Kevin Murray appeals a judgment in favor of Defendants United States Department of Treasury (“Treasury Department”) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Board of Governors”) on his Establishment … Civil Liberties Union of Ky. v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Robert C. Bannert v. American Can Company

    525 F.2d 104 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 23, 1975

    Hainline v. General Motors Corp., 444 F.2d 1250, 1258 (6th Cir. 1971). In Hainline v. … In Couch v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Nuzaira Rahman v. Pamela Bondi

    131 F.4th 399 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 13, 2025

    Id. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v); see also id. § 1182(i)(1). The Board of Immigration No. 23-3608 Rahman v. … They might, for example, dispute the Board’s reading of the phrase “extreme hardship” in the waivers. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), (i)(1).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Detroit Painting Corp.

    108 F.3d 1377 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 10, 1997

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DETROIT PAINTING CORP., Respondent. No. 96-6705. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 10, 1997. NLRB, No. 7-CA-34751(1)(2). NLRB ORDER ENFORCED. … SUPPLEMENTAL JUDGMENT 1 In a judgment entered on November 20, 1995, this court granted summary enforcement of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") finding the respondent had violated federal

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Firstenergy Generation, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    929 F.3d 321 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 2, 2019

    FirstEnergy Generation, LLC v. … NLRB v. Plymouth Stamping Div.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Steel Service Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners

    258 F. App'x 825 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 27, 2007

    Servs. v. Nationwide Ins. … In fact, it is not a proposal for --15-- No. 07-3251 Steel Service Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners anything at all.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Asbestos Removal, Inc.

    892 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 20, 1989

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ASBESTOS REMOVAL, INC., Respondent. No. 89-5840. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 20, 1989. 1 Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, and R. … ORDER 2 On July 13, 1989, the National Labor Relations Board ("the Board") filed an application for enforcement of its March 27, 1989, order in Board Cases 7-CA-28013 and 7-CA-28162 wherein it found the respondent committed

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Abner v. SBC (Ameritech)

    86 F. App'x 958 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 2004

    Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir.2000). A complaint “is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. … Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 , 109 S.Ct. 1827 , 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); see also Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196, 1198 (6th Cir.1990).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Mining Corporation

    66 F.3d 326 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 15, 1995

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SANDS MINING CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 95-5962. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Sept. 15, 1995. Before: CONTIE, NELSON, and RYAN, Circuit Judges. … The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint and has not made an appearance either before the Board or this court. Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Neague v. Cynkar

    258 F.3d 504 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 25, 2001

    PAUL CYNKAR; WORTHINGTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT; WORTHINGTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION (99-4552); DANIEL MURPHY; CITY OF WORTHINGTON (99-4533), DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. … See Mitchell v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Tina Zai v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin. Bd.

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 2025

    . 24-3909 Zai v. … McCarthy v. FDIC, 348 F.3d 1075, 1081 (9th Cir. 2003); see also FDIC v. Scott, 125 F.3d 254, 259 (5th Cir. 1997); Stamm v. Paul, 121 F.3d 635, 641 (11th Cir. No. 24-3909 Zai v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Preece Coal Company

    863 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 25, 1988

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. PREECE COAL COMPANY, Respondent. No. 88-6003. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 25, 1988. Before LIVELY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges and JOHN W. … directions of the Board in said order contained.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rosemary White v. City of Detroit, Mich.

    38 F.4th 495 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 17, 2022

    Brown v. Battle Creek Police Dep’t, 844 F.3d 556, 566 (6th Cir. 2016) (collecting cases). … Brown, 844 F.3d at 568. All considerations accounted for, we ask: Was the seizure “more intrusive than necessary”? Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 504 (1983).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Add Construction Company

    853 F.2d 927 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 5, 1988

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ADD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent. No. 88-5096. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 5, 1988. … Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Board's Office, Patrick V.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.